An arithmetic function is multiplicative if whenever and are coprime integers. If and , every positive integer divisor of is uniquely with and . Hence
so is multiplicative.
The Möbius function is defined by , if the square of a prime number divides , and if is a product of distinct prime numbers. Coprime integers have disjoint sets of prime factors, so this definition immediately gives when .
For , only the square-free divisors contribute, and therefore
For the sum is . Thus in the language of Dirichlet convolution. Convolving with gives the Möbius inversion formula
If , its divisor sum is the sum-of-divisors function. Conversely, if , Möbius inversion gives
using the standard divisor identity for the Euler totient function. Therefore the two requested answers are
A -colouring assigns one of colours to every vertex so that adjacent vertices have different colours. The chromatic number is the least such . An independent set contains no adjacent pair, and the independence number is the maximum size of such a set.
For a concrete first example, start with the five-cycle and apply the Mycielski construction times. Each application raises the chromatic number by one and preserves triangle-freeness. The resulting graph has chromatic number and contains no triangle, hence no complete graph for .
We next prove the stronger high-girth assertion by the probabilistic method. For a large integer , take
If counts cycles of lengths , then
By the first moment method, with probability tending to one .
Let . The expected number of independent sets of size is at most
because dominates . Hence with positive probability has fewer than short cycles and .
Delete one vertex from each cycle of length at most . The remaining graph has no such cycle, has at least vertices, and still has . Since each colour class is independent,
This proves that there are graphs of arbitrarily high girth and chromatic number.
For the final claim, begin instead with
The expected number of triangles is
so with probability tending to one . Put . The expected number of independent -sets is bounded by
because the positive term is whereas the negative term has order .
Thus some such has fewer than triangles and no independent set of size . Delete one vertex from every triangle; more than vertices remain and the graph is triangle-free. Take any induced subgraph on exactly vertices. Vertex deletion cannot increase the independence number, so the resulting graph satisfies
This is the triangle-free graph with sub-power independence number construction.

There are unlisted articles, also show them or only show them.