Use rationalized electromagnetic units with and electrostatic constant . The four-potential transforms by the same matrix as the coordinates:
Write and . Gauss's law for the line at rest gives , . A suitable potential is , . The inverse Lorentz transformation gives , . The fields from and are therefore
The sign agrees with a line charge moving in the positive direction: its density is and its current . In SI units insert in the electric expressions and replace by .
The two invariants check explicitly:
For , the electric field differs from the static field only at order , while the magnetic field is of order and is the field of the moving line current. These fields are evaluated off the charged axis.
For unit incident plane-wave amplitude, define the scattering amplitude by at large . Comparing outgoing radial flux with incident flux gives . Outside the potential, a real regular radial solution is proportional to , with asymptotic phase . This defines the scattering phase shift modulo .
The incident plane-wave expansion supplies coefficient for . To preserve its incoming part, replace by . Writing the asymptotic sine in exponentials shows that its incoming coefficient is unchanged and its outgoing coefficient is multiplied by . The outgoing difference from the plane wave therefore gives
Put , , and abbreviate , . Logarithmic-derivative matching gives . The supplied asymptotics determine the constant Wronskian: . Consequently
Solving for gives
At zeros of denominators it is interpreted by limits; the logarithmic-derivative definition itself presumes its stated denominators nonzero.
Near a dominant resonant partial wave, . Neglecting the small other partial waves yields
This is a resonant peak of width in , with the partial-wave angular pattern and maximum allowed at resonance. Integrating gives . A small background may matter at angular zeros of the dominant wave.
Generalized position eigenstates satisfy and . Define the position-space wavefunction . Completeness then gives . Position acts by multiplication, . Using and momentum completeness, differentiating the Fourier integral gives on the momentum operator's domain.
For the unit-mass, unit-frequency oscillator define
Since , a simultaneous energy eigenstate and -eigenstate would satisfy , forcing . For , the energy is , the smallest possible because .
The position-space equation is . Solving and normalizing, with , gives up to a constant phase
Its squared modulus is a normalized Gaussian, so every complex gives a normalizable coherent state.
For a creation eigenstate, instead gives . Every nonzero such function grows quadratically exponentially at infinity and fails square integrability. Hence there are no nonzero normalizable eigenstates of . This last symbol is in the original PDF, although the converted TeX drops its dagger.
For the Laplace method, under the usual regularity ( continuous at zero and sufficiently smooth near its isolated minimum), write . On any interval bounded away from zero, continuity and uniqueness of the minimum give a positive gap in , making that contribution exponentially smaller. Set near zero. The leading integral is
A local quadratic lower bound on justifies dominated convergence after this rescaling. Thus, when ,
If , the displayed coefficient vanishes and further local terms of determine the first nonzero asymptotic term; one must not interpret a zero coefficient as an asymptotic equivalence.
For the first Bessel integral, take , . The endpoint minimum is , , , so after dividing by its leading term is .
For the second integral, gives, for fixed real ,
Completing the square proves the last bound for large . It is exponentially smaller than the first integral; the fixed prefactor does not change this. Therefore
The Brouwer fixed-point theorem says that every continuous map from a closed Euclidean ball to itself has a fixed point. For the closed disc its equivalent no-retraction theorem says that there is no continuous satisfying on .
Assume the fixed-point theorem and suppose such a retraction exists. Then maps continuously into itself. A fixed point must lie on the boundary, where , giving , impossible on the unit circle.
Conversely suppose is continuous and has no fixed point. From draw the ray through and let be its exit point on the circle. To check continuity rather than merely relying on the picture, put . The exit point is , where
This is continuous, lies on the circle and has . On the boundary the exit point is , so is a retraction, contradicting the assumed theorem. Hence the two disc formulations are equivalent; the same argument works for a ball in any dimension.

There are unlisted articles, also show them or only show them.