Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 ii Paper 1 10D b Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 ii Paper 1 10D a Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 ib Paper 4 9E Solution Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-10-03
Letbe a primitive polynomial. The Eisenstein criterion states that if a prime number satisfiesthen is an irreducible polynomial in , equivalently in by Gauss lemma for polynomials.
To prove it, suppose that with of positive degree. Primitivity and Gauss's lemma let us take such an integral factorisation if a factorisation over exists. Reducing modulo givesBecause does not divide the leading coefficient of , neither factor loses degree on reduction. The polynomial ring is a unique factorization domain, so both reductions are monomials of positive degree. In particular, divides both constant terms and . It follows that dividesa contradiction. This proves the criterion.
For a prime , translate the geometric sum by one:Its leading coefficient is one, every other coefficient is divisible by , and its constant coefficient is , which is not divisible by . It is therefore Eisenstein at . Translation is an automorphism of , soThis is the geometric-sum irreducibility criterion.
The evaluation homomorphismhas image and contains in its kernel. Since is monic, division by in writes every as with . If , then ; the irreducibility of says that is the minimal polynomial of , so . Thus , and the first isomorphism theorem for rings gives
Now take . Then , and the Eisenstein integers areComplex conjugation sends to , so the field norm isGiven , choose integers with . For ,For with , apply this to and put . ThenHence the norm is a Euclidean function, proving that is a Euclidean domain. This is the Euclidean norm on the Eisenstein integers.
Finally suppose satisfies . Make the free abelian group into a -module by definingThis is well-defined precisely because obeys the same polynomial relation as . The module is finitely generated. It is also torsion-free module: if and , multiplication by the conjugate of gives , and the additive group has no nonzero integer torsion.
A Euclidean domain is a principal ideal domain, and the structure theorem for finitely generated modules over a principal ideal domain says that a finitely generated torsion-free module over one is free. Thusfor some . Since has free module basis over , comparison of abelian ranks gives . There can consequently be no such matrix when is odd.
If , choose a -basis . Thenis a -basis, and . In this basis the matrix of is a direct sum of copies ofEvery admissible matrix is therefore conjugate in to . Hence there is exactly one conjugacy class for even , and none for odd . This is the classification of integral matrices satisfying the third cyclotomic polynomial.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 ib Paper 4 8F Solution Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-25
For ordered bases of and of , the matrix representation of a linear map is the matrix whose th column consists of the -coordinates of . Thus
The operators are conjugate linear operators when there is an isomorphism such thatIn one basis their matrices therefore satisfy , so they are similar matrices.
For invertible , the mapis linear, and its inverse is ; hence it is a linear isomorphism of . If , define . A direct substitution givesso and are conjugate. This is the conjugation operator on an endomorphism space.
It remains to compute the Jordan normal form over . By the preceding conjugacy, we may put in Jordan form.
Ifthen the matrix units are eigenvectors becauseThusThis includes the scalar case , when is the identity.
Otherwise has one size-two Jordan block. Multiplying by a nonzero scalar does not change , and conjugating within its Jordan class allows us to use with . Put . Direct multiplication givesHence , , and . The nilpotent Jordan blocks of therefore have sizes three and one. Adding the identity givesThese two cases are the Jordan normal form of conjugation on two-by-two matrices.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 ib Paper 4 7H c Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 ib Paper 4 7H b Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 ib Paper 4 7H a Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 ib Paper 4 6B b Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 ib Paper 4 6B a Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 ib Paper 4 5D c Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 ib Paper 4 5D b Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 ib Paper 4 5D a Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 ib Paper 4 4D b Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 ib Paper 4 4D a Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 ib Paper 4 3G iii Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 ib Paper 4 3G ii Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 ib Paper 4 3G i Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 ib Paper 4 2G Solution Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-10-03
Fix . By assumption there is a neighbourhood of on which with uniform convergence. Each restriction is continuous, and a uniform limit of continuous functions is continuous. Thus is continuous, in particular at . Since was arbitrary, is continuous on .
Now let be compact and let . For each , choose a neighbourhood on which convergence is uniform. The sets cover , so compactness gives a finite subcoverFor each , choose such thatTaking , every belongs to one of these finitely many neighbourhoods, and thereforeThus uniformly on every compact subset. This proves the local uniform convergence on compact subsets principle.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 ib Paper 4 1F Solution Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-25
A bilinear form on is nondegenerate whenIn finite dimensions this is equivalent to nondegeneracy in the first argument.
Define the linear mapNondegeneracy makes injective. Since and its dual space have the same finite dimension, is an isomorphism. Similarly define and setThen is linear and
If , this identity gives for every . Conversely, if for every , then for every , so nondegeneracy gives . HenceThis is the representation of a bilinear form relative to a nondegenerate bilinear form.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 ib Paper 4 18H Solution Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-25
Let be Player I's row-strategy distribution and let denote an all-ones vector of the required dimension. Against column , the expected payoff is . Thus Player I's matrix-game optimization problem isEquivalently, Player I maximizes over the probability simplex.
Let be an optimal mixed strategy for Player II and let the game value be . A sufficient condition for a probability vector to be optimal for Player I isIndeed, this makes guarantee at least against every pure column and hence every mixed strategy. On the other hand, the optimality of prevents any row strategy from obtaining more than against . Therefore is optimal. This is the mixed-strategy optimality certificate for a matrix game.
Now suppose that is invertible and symmetric and that . PutThe vector is nonzero and nonnegative, so and are probability vectors. Since is symmetric,Thus guarantees and holds the payoff to . By the minimax theorem,This proves the symmetric inverse formula for a matrix-game equilibrium.
For the card game, the payoff matrix to Player I isIt is symmetric and invertible, and direct solution of givesThe preceding result therefore gives the same optimal strategy for both players:Thus each player chooses cards with probabilities , respectively, and the value to Player I isThis is the three-card threshold-sum zero-sum game.
There are unlisted articles, also show them or only show them.