This is the action component of action-angle variables, rather than the entire coordinate construction.
A finite group acting freely by diffeomorphisms on a smooth manifold has a smooth quotient. Choose each coordinate neighbourhood disjoint from all its nontrivial translates and transport its chart through the quotient map. The resulting transition maps are restrictions of the original transition maps composed with group elements.
Geometric means of two summable positive sequences by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality gives
If and , then , so eventually and converges.
Image-length measure of a strictly increasing continuous function by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Let be continuous, strictly increasing, and satisfy Lusin condition N. Thendefines a measure on the Lebesgue measurable sets, and . Moreover,for .
A finite abelian group combines a finite set of reversible operations with commutativity. All finite cyclic groups qualify, but direct products of groups supply examples that need more than one generator of a group. The Fundamental theorem of finitely generated abelian groups says that every finite abelian group is a direct product of groups of finite cyclic groups; the finite case has no infinite cyclic factors.[ref]
These factors distinguish different ways to have the same total number of states. A single four-position dial gives , while two independent binary switches give . Both have four states and commutative composition, yet only the dial permits a single operation whose repetition visits all four states. The following Cayley tables make that distinction visible without relying on the labels alone.
A-stability of a symmetric two-stage implicit Runge-Kutta family by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-28
For the two-stage implicit Runge-Kutta method withthe stability function isFor ,The denominator has no zero in the closed left half-plane, so the method is A-stable for every real .
For every real payoff matrix of a two-player zero-sum game, the minimax theorem stateswhere are the players' probability simplices. Both outer optima are attained. The row player's security level payoff is the largest payoff it can guarantee against all opposing choices; the column player can hold that payoff to the same number , the value of a zero-sum game. For optimal ,These are exactly the Nash equilibrium inequalities under the row-maximizes, column-minimizes convention. Conversely, a Nash equilibrium of this two-player zero-sum game supplies both guarantees. This equality explains why independent worst-case optimization solves the opposing incentives in this special class.
Allowing mixed strategies is essential. For matching pennies, . Restricting both players to pure strategies gives and . Allowing mixed strategies closes the gap: each fair mixture guarantees zero, so . These guarantees hold even if the opponent knows the mixture's probabilities, provided the opponent does not observe the sampled choice before choosing.
John von Neumann proved the two-player zero-sum game result in Zur Theorie der Gesellschaftsspiele, Mathematische Annalen 100, 295–320 (1928); the original article's footnote 7 explicitly discusses the equality of max–min and min–max. Nash's [ref] states that existence of a Nash equilibrium is equivalent to this result in the two-player zero-sum game case, and extends existence to all finite games.
There are unlisted articles, also show them or only show them.