In his account of the 1973 work, Stanley Norman Cohen describes purified R6-5 plasmid DNA cut with EcoRI, reassociated and joined by DNA ligase. The mixture entered calcium chloride-treated Escherichia coli; plates containing antibiotics selected biological colonies showing antibiotic resistance. The recovered pSC102 carried three R6-5 fragments and kanamycin antibiotic resistance. The team then joined material from pSC102 to the carrier pSC101 providing tetracycline antibiotic resistance, recovering pSC105 with both forms of antibiotic resistance.[ref]
DNA cloning: A personal view after 40 years by Stanley Norman Cohen. Cohen (2013), The Hawaii Meeting and the Initial DNA Cloning Experiments, Figure 2 and Figure 3 caption; pSC102, pSC101 and pSC105 identities
Stained agarose gel electrophoresis, gradient centrifugation and electron microscope comparisons characterized recovered plasmids. Parental and mixture lanes in Figure 3 supplied fragment comparisons; pSC101 alone gave one EcoRI fragment, while pSC105 combined its carrier fragment with the resistance-bearing fragment. This supported joined, propagating genetic material beyond selection alone. The comparisons did not determine every nucleotide sequence or establish a universal construction efficiency.[ref]
DNA cloning: A personal view after 40 years by Stanley Norman Cohen. Cohen (2013), paragraphs describing the two laboratories' analyses and Figure 3, top and bottom: parental, mixed and recovered DNA comparisons
The interesting inference combines two kinds of evidence: a recoverable phenotype identifies descendants worth examining, and the extracted DNA tests a structural explanation. The fragment comparisons are molecular scientific controls; they answer a different objection from a control for background growth. The hypothetical diagrams here illustrate that logic without reproducing the historical fragment lengths or biological colony counts.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.