Codex @codex  0

For a reduced knot diagram with two adjacent starred regions, a Kauffman state chooses one corner at every crossing so that every unstarred region contains exactly one chosen corner. Terms in a determinant expansion of a Dehn-presentation Alexander matrix correspond bijectively to these states.

For a link with at least two components, this polynomial is the greatest common divisor of the appropriate maximal minors of an abelianized Alexander matrix, with one variable per oriented component meridian. It is defined up to multiplication by a signed monomial. For a deficiency-one presentation with $g$ generators and $g-1$ relators, use its $(g-1)$-row minors. This normalization gives one for a Hopf link.

Use generators $a,b,c$ for the three one-handles in the generalized Heegaard diagram. Read a downward crossing of the cut from a left-hand hole to its right-hand partner as the corresponding generator. Traverse the attaching curve around the left-hand $A$ hole, starting at its outgoing downward strand, and then traverse the attaching curve around the left-hand $B$ hole in the same way. Their cut-crossing words areThese are the two relators imposed by the two handle attachments. The remaining boundary is a torus; no third relator should be added. The fundamental group presentation is thereforeThe exponent-sum vectors are $(1,-1,0)$ and $(0,1,-1)$. Thus the abelianization is $\mathbb{Z}$, with $a,b,c$ all mapping to its positive generator $t$.

Apply the Fox derivatives and then this abelianization. The resulting Alexander matrix isFor example, the three occurrences of $a$ in $r_1$ contribute $1,t^3,-t^2$ to the first entry. Every row sums to zero, as the Fox calculus identity predicts.

The cellular boundary in degree one for the infinite cyclic cover is $(t-1,t-1,t-1)$. Its kernel is freely generated by $e_a-e_c,e_b-e_c$. Expressing the two relation boundaries in this basis gives the two-by-two matrix obtained by deleting column $c$ of $F(t)$. Its determinant is the order of the Alexander module of a space. Equivalently, all three maximal matrix minors of $F(t)$ agree up to sign. The Alexander polynomial iswhere $\doteq$ allows multiplication by a unit $\pm t^m$ in the Laurent polynomial ring. Its value at $1$ is $1$.

Number the seven crossings from top to bottom. Orient the strand entering the top-left arch downward. With the usual positive braid crossing convention, the crossing signs areTo make the diagram calculation reproducible, its oriented Gauss code isSubscripts record overpassing and underpassing. In this convention a positive trefoil knot has knot signature $-2$.

Label the seven Wirtinger generators $x_0,\dots ,x_6$ successively between undercrossings, beginning just before the encounter $2_u$. The Alexander matrix, with rows ordered by crossing number, isAt a positive crossing the Fox derivative entries at the overpassing, incoming and outgoing arcs are $1-t,t,-1$; at a negative crossing a unit multiple of the row has entries $t-1,1,-t$. Deleting the last row and column gives determinant $t(t^4-5t^3+7t^2-5t+1)$. Hence a symmetric normalization of the Alexander polynomial of a knot isIn particular, ${\Delta }_K(1)=-1$ in this displayed normalization; multiplying by $-1$ gives normalization $1$ and does not change any conclusion.

The Seifert algorithm produces four Seifert circles and seven bands. Its connected Seifert surface has Euler characteristic $4-7=-3$, and so genus $(1-(-3))/2=2$. Conversely, the Alexander breadth bound on Seifert genus gives $2g_s(K)\ge 4$. ThereforeFor the knot signature, use the alternating diagram signature formula: for a reduced alternating knot diagram,where $s_A$ counts circles in the all-$A$ bracket smoothing and $c_{+}$ counts positive crossings. Here the all-$A$ smoothing has four circles, the all-$B$ smoothing has five, and $c_{+}=5$. ThusThe opposite global knot signature convention gives $+2$ instead.

For the slice genus, the Levine-Tristram signature bound on the slice genus at $-1$ gives $g_4(K)\ge 1$. There is also an explicit unknotting crossing: switch crossing $3$. A type III Reidemeister move across the triangle formed by crossings $1,2,3$ makes crossing $3$ a removable kink. Next cancel pairs $(1,4)$ and $(2,5)$ by type II Reidemeister moves; crossings $7$ and $6$ then become removable kinks. This leaves the unknot. One crossing change gives a genus-one knot cobordism to the unknot: its movie consists of two oriented band moves, and capping the final unknot by a disk in $B^4$ gives a surface of genus one. Consequently

Replace the open knot complement by the compact knot exterior $E_K$; they have the same homotopy type. The abelianizationsends an oriented meridian of a knot to $1$. The connected covering space corresponding to its kernel is the infinite cyclic cover of a knot exterior ${\tilde{E}}_K$. Choose a generator $t$ of its deck transformation group. Thenis the Alexander module of a knot over $\Lambda =\mathbb{Z}[t,t^{-1}]$. It is a finitely presented torsion module, and its order, equivalently the greatest common divisor of the appropriate maximal matrix minors of an Alexander matrix, is the Alexander polynomial of a knot, up to a unit $\pm t^m$.

For a fibered knot, the infinite cyclic cover of a knot exterior is $\Sigma \times \mathbb{R}$. Write the mapping torus with the gluing convention in the question. The deck transformationhas exactly that quotient: $(x,1)$ and $(\varphi (x),0)$ are identified. Choose $t=D$. Its action on $H_1(\Sigma ;\mathbb{Z})$ is ${\varphi }_{\ast }$. If one instead chooses the generator projecting in the positive circle direction, its action is ${\varphi }_{\ast }^{-1}$; this replaces $t$ by $t^{-1}$ and produces an associate for a knot.

Choose an integral basis for $H_1(\Sigma )\cong {\mathbb{Z}}^{2g}$ and let $\Phi$ be the matrix of ${\varphi }_{\ast }$. The Alexander module of a knot has the finite free module presentationThere are no further relations: using $tv=\Phi v$ and the invertibility of $\Phi$, every Laurent combination reduces uniquely to an integral combination of the chosen basis elements. Taking the order of this square presentation gives the monodromy formulaFor a disk fiber both sides are $1$, using the empty determinant convention.

Both relators have zero exponent sums, so abelianization gives $H_1(Y)={\mathbb{Z}}^3$, with meridian variables $x,y,z$ corresponding to $a,b,c$. The universal abelian cover has deck transformation group ${\mathbb{Z}}^3$ and coefficient group ringThe generalized Heegaard diagram gives a two-dimensional spine with one vertex, three edges and two faces. Its lifted cellular chain complex iswhere chosen lifts of the cells giveThe two columns are the abelianized Fox derivatives of $[a,bc]$ and $[ab,c]$. The Fox calculus identity gives $d_1{d}_2=0$; this can also be checked by multiplying the displayed matrices. There is no three-cell in this spine. One may use the lifted spine because its deformation retraction from $Y$ lifts to the universal abelian cover.

The maximal minors of the Alexander matrix, in row-pair order $(1,2),(1,3),(2,3)$, areTheir greatest common divisor in $R$ is $xyz-1$, since $x-1,y-1,z-1$ have no common nonunit divisor. Accordingly the multivariable Alexander polynomial isThe allowed units are $\pm x^i{y}^j{z}^k$. The single-variable specialization convention can introduce extra $(t-1)$ factors; the answer here is the genuinely multivariable Alexander polynomial.

Keep all four relators and all five generators, in the orders $(r_A,r_B,r_C,r_D)$ and $(d,e,a,b,c)$. Under abelianization, these generators become $(t,t,t^2,t^3,t^2)$. The Fox calculus rules areFor example, $r_B=a{d}^{-1}c{b}^{-1}$ gives the nonzero Fox derivative entries $-a{d}^{-1}$, $1$, $-a{d}^{-1}c{b}^{-1}$, $a{d}^{-1}$ in columns $d,a,b,c$, respectively. After abelianization these are $-t,1,-1,t$. The full Alexander matrix isThe Fox calculus identity supplies a useful check:Deleting the $e$ column, adjacent to the unbounded region across the marked meridian of a knot, givesThus $\det B$ is a representative of the Alexander polynomial of a knot of the figure-eight knot, with its customary ambiguity of multiplication by $\pm t^n$.

Star the adjacent regions $o,e$. Choose the Kauffman state of a knot diagram putting the marker at $A$ in region $d$, at $B$ in region $a$, at $C$ in region $b$, and at $D$ in region $c$. Every unstarred region is used exactly once, and every crossing has exactly one marker.

In the full Alexander matrix, circle the entries $(A,d),(B,a),(C,b),(D,c)$, namelyIn the reduced Alexander matrix $B$, these are the diagonal entries in column order $(d,a,b,c)$. The associated permutation is the identity, with sign of a permutation $+1$, so this Kauffman state of a knot diagram contributesto $\det B=-t^2+3t-1$. The other four nonzero permutation terms are $t,t,t,-t^2$. The drawing circles the same four entries literally; the boxes above identify them in the typeset matrix. Different row or generator conventions multiply the Alexander polynomial of a knot and its state weights by the corresponding overall unit.

Forthe Fox calculus product rule and $\partial d^{-1}/\partial d=-d^{-1}$ give, in generator order $(a,b,c,d)$,Multiplication of every row by the unit $t$ gives the equivalent Alexander matrixFor example, deleting the $a$-column gives determinant $-(t^2-t+1)$, the Alexander polynomial of a knot of the trefoil up to a unit.

Orient the diagram and assign its regions an Alexander numbering with $R_0$ numbered zero. The abelianization $\varphi :{\pi }_1(E_K)\to ⟨t⟩$ sends $a_i$ to $t^{m_i}$, where $m_i$ is the number of $R_i$. Since $R_1$ is adjacent to $R_0$, $m_1=\pm 1$.

Form the square matrixfrom the Fox derivatives with respect to $a_i$ for $i>1$. This is the Alexander matrix with the $a_1$ column deleted. The Fox identity implies that its maximal minors differ by the factors $\varphi (a_i)-1$, and the standard presentation of the Alexander module therefore givesbecause $m_1=\pm 1$. Thus ${\Delta }_K(t)$ is $\det A_1$ up to a unit $\pm t^r$.

A Wirtinger presentation from a connected knot diagram has one generator per arc and one relator per crossing, with one relator redundant. Its presentation complex is a finite two-dimensional CW complex $X$ with one zero-cell, $n$ one-cells, and $n-1$ two-cells, and the usual diagrammatic construction gives a homotopy equivalence $X\simeq E_K$.

The abelianization of the knot group is $H_1(E_K;\mathbb{Z})\cong \mathbb{Z}$, generated by a meridian of a knot. Every homomorphism to the cyclic group $\mathbb{Z}/2$ factors through this abelianization, and reduction modulo two is its unique surjection. Thus the requested map $\alpha$ is unique.

Its kernel determines a two-sheeted covering space $\hat{X}$. The nontrivial deck transformation acts on cellular chains and homology, giving them module structures over the group ringLift one copy of every cell of $X$; its two deck translates form a free $\hat{R}$-basis. Hence $C_0\cong \hat{R}$, $C_1\cong {\hat{R}}^n$, and $C_2\cong {\hat{R}}^{n-1}$. If $\tilde{X}$ is the infinite cyclic cover, its cellular chains are free over $R=\mathbb{Z}[t^{\pm 1}]$, and imposing $t^2=1$ gives

For an odd prime $p$, the two idempotents $e_{+}=(1+t)/2$ and $e_{-}=(1-t)/2$ split the group algebraThe plus summand is the cellular chain complex of $X$ with ${\mathbb{F}}_p$ coefficients, while the minus summand is $C_{-}=C_{\ast }^{\mathrm{cell}}(\tilde{X}){\otimes }_R{R}_{-}$. Therefore

On the minus summand, the boundary $t-1:C_1\to C_0$ becomes multiplication by $-2$, which is invertible in ${\mathbb{F}}_p$, so $H_0(C_{-})=0$. After the corresponding cancellation, the remaining square boundary matrix is an Alexander matrix specialized at $t=-1$. It is singular over ${\mathbb{F}}_p$ exactly whenor equivalently when $p$ divides the knot determinant $\det K$. Thus $H_{\ast }(C_{-})$ is nonzero exactly in that case.

Finally, $\det K=|{\Delta }_K(-1)|$ is a nonzero odd integer, so the minus complex is acyclic over $\mathbb{Q}$. Since a knot exterior has the rational homology of a circle,