Let . Since the alphabet is finite, these independent and identically distributed random variables are finite almost surely, have mean , and have finite variance . Also
The weak law of large numbers says that this average converges in probability to . Thus
One can also state the quantitative Chebyshev inequality bound . If , every word of positive probability is in the typical set. This is the finite-alphabet asymptotic equipartition property.
Fix and . By the asymptotic equipartition property, all sufficiently large satisfy . For any epsilon-sufficient set ,
Each word in this intersection has probability at most . Hence
which gives the minimum size of a sufficient set for an IID source:
The Chebyshev inequality used above supplies the sufficient quantitative condition . No assumption that itself is a typical set is needed; its intersection with one provides the bound.
Let
Here has the binomial distribution with parameters . Part a, now with independent coordinates, gives
By Pinsker's inequality, the probability mass functions therefore converge in total variation, and in particular converges in distribution to .
The joint probability of the observed row depends only on :
Taking logarithms in any fixed base and choosing gives
where
The convergence lemma supplied in the question now yields
This sparse triangular array therefore has a random limiting normalized self-information rather than the constant limit in the usual asymptotic equipartition property.
The asymptotic equipartition property is in probability. For an i.i.d. source this is the weak law applied to , and independence gives . Thus its information rate and AEP constant are both .
For a typical set of probability at least ,
The upper bound sums the lower probability bound for each word; the lower bound sums the upper probability bound and uses the set's total probability. These bounds turn the asymptotic equipartition property into exponential estimates of source-coding dimension.