Bertrand's theorem Created 2026-10-20 Updated 2026-10-24
Joseph Bertrand's theorem states that, among smooth attractive central potentials admitting stable circular orbits, requiring every bound orbit to be closed singles out the inverse-distance potential energy and the isotropic quadratic potential energy, up to additive constants. Rational radial-to-angular frequency ratios near a circular orbit provide only a necessary local closure test; finite-amplitude closure is the additional content. In , the radial-to-angular frequency ratio near a stable circle is , and stability requires and . The all-bound-orbit cases are and .
Bound orbit 2026-10-20
An orbit that remains within a bounded spatial region for all times for which the motion is defined. In an attractive inverse-distance central potential with zero potential energy at infinity, a noncolliding orbit is bound when its total mechanical energy is negative. That sign test depends on the potential and its energy origin; it is not a universal definition of bounded motion. A closed orbit repeats its position and velocity, whereas a general bound orbit can precess without closing.
Closed orbit Created 2026-10-20 Updated 2026-11-05
A closed orbit returns to the same complete state and repeats its motion. For a nonconstant solution of an autonomous differential equation with unique solutions, for a positive period describes a periodic orbit. This usage excludes an equilibrium point, which is a stationary state rather than a moving cycle.
A harmonic oscillator has closed ellipses in its phase plane, because both position and velocity return after one oscillation. Returning to position alone is insufficient: a particle can pass the same point with a different velocity. A bound orbit also need not close; a precessing orbit can remain in a limited spatial region while changing its direction of closest approach. Specifying the complete state prevents a repeating projection from being mistaken for a repeating physical motion.
Orbital energy. Treat the star as stationary to leading order in , with Newtonian gravitational parameter . For velocity components in plane polar coordinates, . The kinetic energy is . Integrating Newton's law of universal gravitation with zero gravitational potential energy at infinite separation gives . Thus
where is the satellite's angular momentum. The first term is radial kinetic energy; the second is transverse kinetic energy, also the centrifugal contribution to the radial effective potential; the last is the attractive gravitational potential energy. These are not three independent sources of energy: the centrifugal term is already part of the ordinary kinetic energy.
For an elliptic Kepler orbit of semi-major axis and orbital eccentricity , the polar equation of a Kepler orbit has semilatus rectum . Substituting into the preceding expression reduces it to
For a circular Kepler orbit, , , , and . Negative total energy describes a bound orbit.
Rapid, symmetric mass loss. Assume the mass is removed on a timescale short compared with the satellite's orbital period, without an impulsive kick or appreciable wind drag on the satellite. The post-loss gravitational parameter is with . At the change, , , and are unchanged. Spherical symmetry keeps the force central, so the specific angular momentum is conserved. Orbital energy is not conserved across the changing gravitational field:
The new semi-major axis is consequently
The original speed now exceeds the new circular speed at , and the outward radial acceleration is . Thus the release point is the new pericentre, not the apocentre. The impulsive orbital expansion under isotropic mass loss gives
For the stated one-percent loss,
An independent angular momentum check is . The impulsive orbit stays bound for ; loss of half the central mass is the zero-orbital energy limit.
What the wind timescale changes. The source specifies a spherically symmetric wind but does not give its duration. The preceding nearest and furthest distances require the rapid-loss assumption. In the opposite, slow limit, adiabatic orbital expansion under isotropic mass loss preserves an initially circular orbit to leading adiabatic order. Conserved specific angular momentum then gives , hence . After the same loss,
For a finite intermediate timescale, the orbit depends on the mass-loss history; the percentage alone does not select a unique pair of turning distances. Neglecting wind recoil and wind drag is common to both idealizations.
For two isolated point masses in a Newtonian bound orbit, , where is the relative orbit's semimajor axis. For a negligible planet mass, using years, astronomical units and solar masses gives . The mass in the denominator is the total gravitating mass, not the planet's mass alone.