A negative-energy odd bound state has , , with inside and a decaying exponential outside. Its jump condition, equivalently the nontrivial upper-half-plane pole of the preceding S-matrix, gives
Set and . The condition is . The right side is strictly increasing and strictly concave, has slope at zero and is bounded by . Hence there is exactly one positive intersection iff . Therefore
The formal zero root is not a positive-decay bound state. At there is a zero-energy threshold solution, not a normalizable bound state.
For a one-dimensional wavefunction, the probability current is
A plane wave carries current to the right, while carries the negative of this current. Thus the asymptotic terms are interpreted as an incident wave of amplitude , a reflected wave of amplitude , and a transmitted wave of amplitude . Their currents are
Current conservation for a real potential gives , and therefore
with .
A normalizable bound state has . Writing
its decaying asymptotic behaviour is
Let
Using and in the phase-shift formula gives
By the definition of the scattering length from a partial-wave S-matrix,
Thus diverges exactly when
At each such value, an S-wave bound state lies at the continuum threshold: the exterior zero-energy radial solution becomes constant, its logarithmic derivative vanishes, and the system has a zero-energy scattering resonance. As the well deepens through the critical value, a new bound state appears and the scattering length passes through infinity and changes sign.
As ,
so for all sufficiently small positive . On the other hand,
The derivative satisfies
The extremum equation
has exactly one positive solution because its left side is strictly increasing. Thus has one global minimum, and that minimum is negative.
The potential tends to zero at spatial infinity, so zero is the threshold of the continuous spectrum. A trial state with negative energy expectation forces the spectrum below zero; the corresponding lowest spectral value is a normalizable bound state. Hence every produces at least one bound state.
As , the equation approaches
If , the asymptotic solutions are oscillatory and do not decay, so there are no bound states. If , the asymptotic solutions are exponential; one decaying branch can be selected at each end. Bound states are therefore possible, although only energies satisfying the global matching conditions actually occur.
The time-independent Schrodinger equation is
Integrating it over and letting shows that has no jump because is finite. A jump in would create a delta term in and hence a derivative of a delta in , so is also continuous.
For a bound state , define
Then the proposed even wavefunction solves the equation away from the interfaces, and
Continuity at gives , while continuity of the derivative gives . Dividing yields the second required relation
Thus the lowest even state of the finite square well is the first-quadrant intersection, with , of the circle and the curve .
At small ,
Since ,
The scattering length and low-energy total cross-section are therefore
The poles at and lie on the positive imaginary axis. They represent two bound states, with energies
There are no resonance poles away from the imaginary axis in the lower half-plane. Positivity of puts the poles on the physical bound-state axis, where decays; changing its sign would move them to the unphysical half-plane. This illustrates the bound-state poles of a partial-wave S-matrix.
Write . An even bound state is proportional to inside the well and to outside, where
Continuity of the logarithmic derivative at gives
For sufficiently small , lies in the first monotone branch, so this equation has exactly one positive root and the even state is unique up to scale.
As , . Hence
The wells converge distributionally to , whose normalized even bound state is
Its derivative jump is precisely the one imposed by the delta potential.
Set
The integral equation becomes
Evaluating it at the three delta functions gives
Thus
For , all three Green-function terms are proportional to . Hence
Now define , so that . If denotes the matrix multiplying , direct evaluation gives
The displayed algebraic equation is therefore exactly the condition that the finite-dimensional scattering system become singular. Its solutions are poles of the analytically continued scattering amplitude.
To see the imaginary-axis poles directly, write with . When , the equation reduces to
and its nonzero root is , or
This is the bound state of the coincident potential . When , the three centres decouple and the roots approach
with exponentially small splitting. A pole at has energy and an exponentially decaying wavefunction, so these upper imaginary-axis singularities represent bound states.
For a reflectionless scattering wavefunction whose two asymptotic phases differ by , a large periodic box gives . Compared with the free value , away from thresholds. Discrete bound states and phase-branch changes alter mode indexing and must be counted when comparing complete spectra.
Relativistic bound-state mass from a rapidity pole Created 2026-10-06 Updated 2026-10-07
At relative rapidity , the analytically continued sum of the constituent four-momentum vectors is on the bound-state mass shell with the displayed mass. For equal constituents, rapidities sum to . A pole at is at threshold rather than a strictly bound state.
Scattering s-channel 2026-10-06
The direct channel combines the two incoming four-momentum vectors. A one-particle pole in this channel has the intermediate particle's squared mass equal to . Imaginary rapidity differences can satisfy this mass relation for a bound state even though there is no pole at real physical scattering rapidity.
For the unit-modulus hyperbolic scattering block with elementary mass , a pair bound at rapidity difference has mass . Bootstrap fusion with another elementary particle gives a further direct pole at . It is inside the physical rapidity strip with positive imaginary residue only for . In that range the new bound state has rest-frame constituent rapidities , so its energy is . Charges add at the bound-state vertex. At the apparent pole cancels; beyond that point it lies outside the physical strip. The formula is conditional on this particular scattering block and its direct-pole interpretation, not a universal three-body binding law.