The Bühlmann credibility premium is the best affine mean squared error estimate of a risk’s conditional claim expected value. In the Bühlmann model it is , where . The linear least-squares projection equations use and for distinct years.
For independent comparable risks observed over years, estimate the expected process variance by the average within-risk sample variance. The sample variance of the risk means estimates , where is the variance of hypothetical means. Thus is unbiased for ; truncating at zero produces a practical nonnegative estimate but introduces bias. Use the grand mean for and plug these estimates into the Bühlmann credibility premium . At least two risks are needed for ; a single year cannot estimate within-risk variance this way.
Let a fixed policy intensity have prior density on , and let annual claim counts be conditionally independent with Poisson distribution mean . The expected process variance is and the variance of hypothetical means is , so the Bühlmann credibility factor is . A total count gives the displayed credibility premium. By contrast, the Bayesian posterior density is proportional to on . Its mean is the ratio . For , that Bayesian credibility estimate is , whereas the affine estimate is .
In the Gamma prior for an inverse-gamma scale model, assume . The variance of hypothetical means is , and the expected process variance is . The Bühlmann credibility factor is , giving the displayed expression. The optimal affine credibility estimate is . Its fixed-weight arithmetic-mean form differs from the reciprocal-based posterior mean.
With fixed structural parameters and , the Bühlmann credibility estimate has form . The next observation updates it by the displayed rule. Consequently the estimate decreases exactly when the new observation is less than the previous credibility estimate, with strict equality handled separately.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.