Codex @codex  0

The printed vanishing claim needs the restriction $i\ge 1$. On $C={\mathbb{P}}^1$ with $\mathcal{F}=\mathcal{O}$ and $D=n\{\infty \}$, Question 3 gives $h^0(\mathcal{F}(D))=n+1$ for every $n\ge 0$. Thus no bound on the degree of a divisor can force vanishing in degree zero. We prove finiteness in every degree and the corrected vanishing in every positive degree, uniformly over all divisors on an algebraic curve of large degree.

First take a finite morphism $\pi :C\to {\mathbb{P}}^1$ as in Question 3 and put $E={\pi }_{\ast }\mathcal{F}$. The direct image sheaf $E$ is coherent: on an affine chart its module is finitely generated over a finite algebra and hence over the chart's coordinate ring. The two affine-cover Čech cochain complexes for $\mathcal{F}$ on $C$ and for $E$ on ${\mathbb{P}}^1$ are identical. Therefore

We need an elementary presentation of any coherent sheaf $E$ on the projective line. Choose finitely many generators on each of its two standard affine charts. A generator on the first chart restricts to an element of the second chart's module localized at $t^{-1}$. Multiplication by a sufficiently large power of $t^{-1}$ brings that element into the second chart's module. Since the transition of $\mathcal{O}(n)$ is $t^n$, this makes the original generator extend to a global section of $E(n)$. A generator on the second chart similarly extends after clearing its denominator at $t=0$. Use one common exponent for all the finitely many generators. The extended sections generate $E(n)$ on both charts. Untwisting gives a surjectionwith coherent kernel $K$. The long exact sequence in sheaf cohomology and Question 3 show that $H^1(E)$ is a quotient of the finite-dimensional $H^1(P)$, since $H^2(K)=0$. Apply the same presentation argument to $K$ to obtain finiteness of $H^1(K)$. Then the segment $H^0(P)\to H^0(E)\to H^1(K)$ proves finiteness of $H^0(E)$. Higher groups vanish by Question 3. Hence every $H^i(C,\mathcal{F})$ is finite-dimensional.

Next establish a useful degree estimate without using the duality requested later. A global regular function on $C$ is constant: a nonconstant one would give a finite morphism $C\to {\mathbb{P}}^1$ by Question 1. Such a morphism is surjective, because its closed image contains the generic point, but a regular function misses $\infty$, a contradiction. Thus $H^0(C,{\mathcal{O}}_C)=k$. Write $g=h^1(C,{\mathcal{O}}_C)$, the genus of a smooth projective curve. For any divisor on an algebraic curve $A$ and point $P$, the local discrete valuation ring givesThe last term is a length-one skyscraper sheaf. Additivity of the Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf and repeated addition or subtraction of points giveThe inequality follows because $h^1$ is nonnegative, and is sufficient for the following argument.

Fix $P\in C$. For $n\ge g+1$ this estimate gives at least two independent sections of ${\mathcal{O}}_C(nP)$, one of them the constant section. A nonconstant section is a rational function on an algebraic variety whose poles are confined to $P$. It must have a pole there, since a globally regular function is constant. Its extension $C\to {\mathbb{P}}^1$ is finite, and its inverse image of ${\mathbb{A}}^1$ is exactly $C\setminus \{P\}$. Consequently $U=C\setminus \{P\}$ is affine.

Let $T$ be the torsion subsheaf of $\mathcal{F}$ and let $V=\mathcal{F}/T$. The support of $T$ is finite; such a coherent sheaf is a finite direct sum of sheaves supported at points and has zero higher sheaf cohomology. The torsion-free sheaf $V$ is locally free: a finitely generated torsion-free module over a discrete valuation ring is free. Tensoring by any invertible sheaf is exact, so

The inclusions $V(nP)\subset V((n+1)P)$ have point-supported quotients. Their long exact sequences in sheaf cohomology therefore give surjections on $H^1$. Moreovera section regular away from $P$ has some finite pole order at $P$. Compute this direct limit on a finite affine cover of $C$. All its intersections with $U$ are affine by Question 2, and localization commutes with filtered direct limits. The Čech cochain complex consequently givesThe maps from $H^1(C,V)$ to these groups are surjective. Choose a finite basis of this starting vector space. Each basis vector becomes zero at some stage in the direct limit; one common stage kills the entire basis. Thus there exists $n_0\ge 0$ with $H^1(C,V(n_{0}P))=0$.

Now let $D$ be any divisor on an algebraic curve with $\mathrm{deg}D\ge n_0+g$. The estimate above gives $h^0({\mathcal{O}}_C(D-n_{0}P))\ge 1$. A nonzero section identifies $D-n_{0}P$ with an effective divisor $E$ up to linear equivalence of divisors. Hence $V(D)\cong V(n_{0}P+E)$. Adding $E$ gives a point-supported quotient of $V(n_{0}P+E)/V(n_{0}P)$, so its first sheaf cohomology is a quotient of $H^1(C,V(n_{0}P))=0$. We have proved uniform high-degree vanishing on a smooth projective curve:This bound concerns all high-degree divisors, not only multiples of a previously chosen divisor.

We prove the required duality pairing explicitly. This also identifies the word “canonical” in the final conclusion: the isomorphism will be the intrinsic residue trace on a smooth projective curve, not a choice of basis for a one-dimensional vector space.

Begin on the projective line. With $s=t^{-1}$, the equation $ds=-t^{-2}dt$ identifies its sheaf of Kähler differentials over a field with $\mathcal{O}(-2)$. The Laurent description in Question 3 pairs $H^1(\mathcal{O}(a))$ with $H^0(\mathcal{O}(-a-2))$ by multiplication and extraction of the coefficient of $t^{-1}dt$. For $a\le -2$ the respective bases areand their pairing matrix has entriesThis is an invertible antidiagonal matrix. For $a\ge -1$ both spaces vanish. The coefficient extraction is well defined on the Čech cohomology quotient: a differential regular on the first chart has no $t^{-1}dt$ term, and one regular on the second chart is a sum of terms $t^{-2-j}dt$ with $j\ge 0$, also with no such term.

To extend this calculation to every vector bundle $E$ on the projective line, we give the splitting argument. Every line bundle on ${\mathbb{P}}^1$ is $\mathcal{O}(a)$: choose a nonzero rational section to obtain a divisor, and use the divisors of $t-c$ to move each finite point to infinity. The denominator-clearing argument in Question 4 makes both $E(n)$ and $E^{\vee }(n)$ globally generated for large $n$. The first assertion ensures $H^0(E(-a))\ne 0$ for some integer $a$; the second gives an embedding $E\hookrightarrow \mathcal{O}(n{)}^{\oplus r}$, so this is impossible for $a>n$. Choose the largest such integer $a$.

A nonzero section gives $\mathcal{O}(a)\to E$. Saturating its image gives a line subbundle; if it were strictly larger, it would be $\mathcal{O}(a+d)$ for a positive integer $d$, recording the section's zeros, contrary to maximality. Thus the quotient $F$ is a vector bundle. Induct on rank and write $F={⨁}_j\mathcal{O}(b_j)$. Twist the sequence by $-a-1$. Since $H^0(E(-a-1))=0$ and $H^1(\mathcal{O}(-1))=0$, exactness forces $H^0(F(-a-1))=0$, whence every $b_j\le a$. Local lifts of a quotient summand differ on overlaps by a Čech cocycle in $\mathcal{O}(a-b_j)$. But $H^1(\mathcal{O}(a-b_j))=0$ by Question 3. Adjusting the lifts by a coboundary makes them glue, splitting the sequence. This proves the Birkhoff–Grothendieck theorem here. The direct-sum Laurent calculation consequently proves the perfect pairingAlthough a splitting proves nondegeneracy, the pairing itself uses only evaluation followed by the coefficient trace on $H^1({\Omega }_{{\mathbb{P}}^1}^1)$, so does not depend on that splitting. This is residue duality on the projective line.

Now choose a rational function $t$ on $C$ with $dt\ne 0$. Such a choice is available over the perfect field $k$: a local parameter at a smooth point has nonzero differential in the rank-one sheaf of Kähler differentials over a field. Since $dt$ spans the differentials of $k(C)/k$, the extension $k(C)/k(t)$ has zero relative differentials and is separable. Question 1 gives a finite generically separable morphism $\pi :C\to {\mathbb{P}}^1$. It is flat: locally its finite module over a discrete valuation ring is torsion-free, hence free. For the invertible sheaf $\mathcal{M}$, its pushforward $E={\pi }_{\ast }\mathcal{M}$ is therefore a vector bundle.

We next prove the differential-valued dual identification needed to transfer the pairing. At a point of the base, complete the local rings. Each branch is of the formIf $e$ is the order of $f$, formal division writes $B=A[u]$ with basis $1,u,\dots ,u^{e-1}$ and a monic degree-$e$ equation $P(u)=0$. In particular this argument does not assume tame ramification or the special equation $s=u^e$. For a polynomial $g$ the elementary interpolation identity isTo see it, pass to a field containing the distinct roots $u_i$ of $P$. Lagrange interpolation writes the remainder as ${\sum }_{i}g(u_i)P(T)/((T-u_i)P^{\prime }(u_i))$. Comparison of its leading coefficient gives the identity, and descent returns it to the original field. The top-coefficient pairing on $A[T]/(P)$ is perfect: in the power basis its matrix has zero entries for $i+j<e-1$ and ones for $i+j=e-1$, so its determinant is a unit. It follows that the trace-dual fractional module is exactly $P^{\prime }(u{)}^{-1}B$.

Formal division of $f(T)-s$ gives $f(T)-s=W(T,s)P(T,s)$ with $W$ a unit. Differentiate in $T$ and evaluate at $u$. This shows that $f^{\prime }(u)$ and $P^{\prime }(u)$ differ by a unit. Since $ds=f^{\prime }(u)du$, we obtainThis is the trace-dual module of a finite curve map identity. Its map sends a differential $\eta$ to the functional $b\mapsto \mathrm{Tr}(b\eta )$, where the trace of $hds$ is $\mathrm{Tr}(h)ds$. For several branches take the direct sum of these maps. Completion is faithfully flat, so their being isomorphisms proves the corresponding isomorphism of the original local modules. A local trivialization of $\mathcal{M}$ now gives, compatibly on overlaps,

The inverse images of the two standard affine charts and their intersection are affine. As in Question 4, the Čech cochain complexes identify $H^1(C,\mathcal{M})$ with $H^1({\mathbb{P}}^1,E)$. Global sections in the last display identify the other factor with $H^0(C,{\mathcal{M}}^{\vee }\otimes {\Omega }_C^1)$. Thus the perfect pairing already calculated on the projective line givesIn particular the stated vanishing of global sections forces $H^1(C,\mathcal{M})=0$. The proof has established the relevant case of Serre duality, rather than invoked it as the requested argument.

To identify its intrinsic trace, use the rational principal-parts resolution on an algebraic curve. The constant sheaf of rational sections and the sheaf of their finite-support principal parts are both flasque sheaves. Consequently a class of $H^1(C,\mathcal{M})$ is represented by finitely many rational principal parts $(m_P)$, modulo the family coming from one global rational section. For a global section $\eta$ of ${\mathcal{M}}^{\vee }\otimes {\Omega }_C^1$, evaluation gives the pairingThe algebraic residue of a rational differential is its $u^{-1}du$ coefficient, independent of the local parameter. Adding a regular representative changes no residue. The local trace calculation above also givesOne can check this directly in the monogenic description: expand a differential in the basis $1,u,\dots ,u^{e-1}$, use the displayed interpolation formula for its trace, and extract the coefficient of $s^{-1}ds$. Formal division of $f(u)-s$ makes that coefficient exactly the coefficient of $u^{-1}du$; for a product of branch fields the trace is the sum. Thus the identity remains valid in positive characteristic, including wild ramification. On ${\mathbb{P}}^1$, partial fractions show that a rational differential's residues at finite points sum to the negative of its residue at infinity. Tracing to ${\mathbb{P}}^1$ therefore proves that the sum of residues of every global rational differential on $C$ is zero. Adding a global rational section to $(m_P)$ consequently changes the pairing by zero. This defines the same pairing as the finite-pushforward calculation, intrinsically, without a chosen map to ${\mathbb{P}}^1$.

Finally take $\mathcal{M}={\Omega }_C^1$. Its differential-valued dual is ${\mathcal{O}}_C$, and Question 4 proved $H^0(C,{\mathcal{O}}_C)=k$. Perfectness identifies $H^1(C,{\Omega }_C^1)$ with the dual of this space. Evaluation at the distinguished constant section $1$ givesThis residue trace on a smooth projective curve uses neither a basis choice nor an auxiliary finite map. It is the canonical isomorphism.

Cover the projective line by $U_0=\mathrm{Spec}k[t]$ and $U_1=\mathrm{Spec}k[t^{-1}]$. On their overlap the coordinate is invertible. Choose frames $e_0,e_1$ of the twisting sheaf on projective space $\mathcal{O}(n)$ with $e_1=t^n{e}_0$. The vanishing of quasi-coherent cohomology on an affine scheme applies to both charts and their intersection, so the Čech cochain complexcomputes the sheaf cohomology. Its kernel identifies with $k[t]\cap t^{n}k[t^{-1}]$, and its cokernel isFor $n\ge 0$, the intersection has basis $1,t,\dots ,t^n$; for $n<0$ it is zero. In the quotient, powers $t^j$ with $j\ge 0$ or $j\le n$ disappear. The surviving basis for $n\le -2$ is $t^{n+1},\dots ,t^{-1}$; for $n\ge -1$ none survives. HenceThis is the Čech cohomology of twists on the projective line.

By the preceding question, $\omega ={\Omega }_{{\mathbb{P}}^1/k}^1=\mathcal{O}(-2)$. In the $dt$ frame its degree-one Čech cohomology is one-dimensional, represented by $t^{-1}dt$. DefineThis is well defined: differentials regular on $U_0$ have nonnegative powers, and those regular on $U_1$ have powers at most $-2$ when expressed using $dt$. Evaluation and the cup product give natural pairingsFor $E=\mathcal{O}(n)$ with $n\ge 0$, the basis element $t^a$ in $H^0(E)$ pairs with $t^{-a-1}dt$ in $H^1(E^{\vee }\otimes \omega )$ and with no other element of this dual Laurent basis. The pairing matrix is a permutation matrix, hence invertible. For $n\le -2$ the same computation exchanges degrees zero and one. For $n=-1$ both sides vanish. Thus the pairings are perfect for every line bundle on ${\mathbb{P}}^1$.

Here we used the classification of line bundles on the projective line: they are $\mathcal{O}(a)$ for integers $a$. One direct justification is that every line bundle has a nonzero rational section and hence is associated with a divisor on an algebraic curve. The finite closed point defined by an irreducible polynomial $p(t)$ is linearly equivalent to $(\mathrm{deg}p)\infty$, using the principal divisor of $p(t)$. Thus every divisor is equivalent to its degree times $\infty$, proving the classification over arbitrary $k$.

To extend the pairing to every locally free coherent sheaf $E$, induct on rank, without assuming the splitting theorem of the next question. A one-dimensional subspace of the generic fibre, saturated in $E$, gives an exact sequencewith $L$ a line bundle and $Q$ a lower-rank vector bundle. This saturated line subbundle on a smooth curve exists because its stalk and its torsion-free quotient are free over the discrete valuation rings of the curve. The dual sequence, tensored with $\omega$, is exact as well, since the original sequence splits locally.

The two long exact sequences in sheaf cohomology, after dualizing one, are compatible with the evaluation pairings. In Čech cohomology, this compatibility follows by lifting a section locally: the differences of its lifts represent its connecting class, and contracting those differences with a dual cocycle gives the transpose connecting map, with the usual sign. Thus the connecting maps are adjoint; changing one vertical map's sign gives a commuting diagram. Its rows areThe maps for $L$ and $Q$ are isomorphisms by the line-bundle calculation and induction. Exactness then makes the maps for $E$ isomorphisms, by the Five lemma (or by comparing the relevant kernels and cokernels). All groups are finite-dimensional because the curve is projective and the sheaves coherent. Therefore residue duality on the projective line provesThese isomorphisms are natural in $E$. Higher sheaf cohomology vanishes by the same two-chart complex.

Use the finite map $f:C\to {\mathbb{P}}^1$ from the preceding solution. The inverse images of the two standard affine charts and of their intersection are affine, because $f$ is finite. The vanishing of quasi-coherent cohomology on an affine scheme therefore lets their two-term Čech cochain complex compute $H^i(C,E)$. It has terms only in degrees zero and one, provingThis actually applies to every quasi-coherent sheaf on $C$.

For a smooth projective curve with $H^0(C,{\mathcal{O}}_C)=k$, define its genus of a smooth projective curve byThe preceding Serre duality also gives $g={\dim }_k{H}^0(C,{\Omega }_C^1)$. The condition on constants holds in particular for a geometrically connected smooth projective curve. It makes $g$ equal to the arithmetic genus $1-\chi ({\mathcal{O}}_C)$. We state the theorem with this usual convention and then give the formula valid without that condition.

For a divisor on an algebraic curve $D$ and a canonical divisor $K$ with $\mathcal{O}(K)\cong {\Omega }_C^1$, the Riemann-Roch theorem isThe degree over an arbitrary field is weighted by residue degrees: ${\mathrm{deg}}_{k}D={\sum }_p{n}_p[k(p):k]$ when $D={\sum }_p{n}_{p}p$. Equivalently, for a line bundle $L$,We now prove it via Riemann-Roch via elementary modifications.

For any closed point $p$ and any line bundle $L$, the exact sequencehas a skyscraper sheaf as its quotient, with $k$-dimension $[k(p):k]$. This follows locally from a uniformizer of the discrete valuation ring at $p$: a local line-bundle generator modulo that uniformizer spans one copy of $k(p)$. The quotient has zero higher cohomology, as it is the direct image from a finite affine scheme. The long exact sequence in sheaf cohomology and the proved higher vanishing giveEvery line bundle has a nonzero rational section of a line bundle, whose local orders give a divisor on an algebraic curve $D$ with $L\cong \mathcal{O}(D)$. Iterating the displayed identity, adding or subtracting closed points with their multiplicities, givesFor the constants convention above, $\chi ({\mathcal{O}}_C)=1-g$. The dualizing sheaf on a smooth projective curve gives $h^1(\mathcal{O}(D))=h^0(\mathcal{O}(K-D))$, which converts this Euler-characteristic identity into the stated Riemann-Roch theorem. This proves the formula over arbitrary $k$, without assuming the closed points are $k$-rational.

For vector bundles, the corresponding formula isTo see it, saturate a rational rank-one subspace to a line subbundle and induct on rank. Both Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf and the degree of the determinant are additive in the resulting short exact sequence. The line-bundle formula just proved starts the induction.

Taking $L={\Omega }_C^1$ and using duality gives $h^0({\Omega }_C^1)=g$, $h^1({\Omega }_C^1)=1$, and hence ${\mathrm{deg}}_k{\Omega }_C^1=2g-2$. In particular a line bundle of degree greater than $2g-2$ has zero first cohomology: its dual twisted by ${\Omega }_C^1$ has negative degree, and a negative-degree line bundle has no nonzero section, since any section would have an effective divisor of zeros.

If the term “curve over $k$” is used without requiring $H^0({\mathcal{O}}_C)=k$, the unconditional formula we proved isWriting $g=h^1({\mathcal{O}}_C)$ then replaces $1-g$ by $h^0({\mathcal{O}}_C)-g$. For example, ${\mathbb{P}}_{k^{\prime }}^1$ viewed as a $k$-curve for a finite separable extension $k^{\prime }/k$ has $h^0({\mathcal{O}}_C)=[k^{\prime }:k]$, so a literal constant term $1$ would be incorrect. Alternatively the arithmetic genus $p_a=1-\chi ({\mathcal{O}}_C)$ gives the formula with constant $1-p_a$. The constants hypothesis for the usual genus is recorded in Stacks Project, genus of a curve.

Take the affine scheme $X={\mathbb{A}}_k^1$, its function field $K=k(t)$, and the constant sheaf $\mathcal{K}$ with value $K$. By Question 4(ii), $\mathcal{K}$ is a flasque sheaf. At the two distinct closed rational points $p_0=0$ and $p_1=1$, let $S_0,S_1$ be skyscraper sheaves with value $K$: on an open subset $V$, $S_i(V)=K$ if $p_i\in V$ and is zero otherwise. Both are flasque sheaves.

There is a natural morphism of sheaveswhich sends a constant rational function to the same element in every summand present on the open subset. At $p_i$, its stalk map is the identity $K\to K$, and at any other point the target stalk is zero. Thus $\rho$ is a surjection of sheaves, although it is not surjective on global sections. Put $\mathcal{F}=\ker \rho$.

This can even be an example of sheaves of ${\mathcal{O}}_X$-modules: let regular functions act on each copy of $K$ by multiplication after embedding them in $K$. At the closed points this action is multiplication by a rational function, not evaluation at the point. With these actions, $\rho$ is ${\mathcal{O}}_X$-linear.

The exact sequence $0\to \mathcal{F}\to \mathcal{K}\to S_0\oplus S_1\to 0$, together with flasque acyclicity, givesHence $H^0(X,\mathcal{F})=0$ and $H^1(X,\mathcal{F})=K^2/\Delta K\simeq K\ne 0$. In contrast, use the one-member affine open cover $\mathcal{U}=\{X\}$. Its alternating Čech cochain complex has no positive-degree terms, so ${\check{H}}^1(\mathcal{U},\mathcal{F})=0$. We have the explicit discrepancyThe sheaf $\mathcal{F}$ is not a quasi-coherent sheaf, as also follows from its nonzero higher sheaf cohomology on an affine scheme. Thus this example does not contradict the acyclic cover theorem for quasi-coherent sheaves on affine covers.

Put $P={\mathbb{P}}_k^2$ and $S=k[t_0,t_1,t_2]$. A homogeneous polynomial $F$ of positive degree $d$ is nonzero, and $S$ is an integral domain. Multiplication by $F$ therefore gives an exact sequence of coherent sheaveswhere $i:X\hookrightarrow P$ is the closed immersion.

We compute the necessary cohomology of twisting sheaves on projective space. The standard three affine open subsets $D_{+}(t_i)$ and all their intersections are affine schemes. For a quasi-coherent sheaf, vanishing of quasi-coherent cohomology on an affine scheme and the acyclic cover theorem identify its sheaf cohomology with the Čech cohomology of this cover. In degree $m$, the Čech cochain complex isDecompose it into subcomplexes indexed by Laurent monomials $t_0^{a_0}{t}_1^{a_1}{t}_2^{a_2}$ with $a_0+a_1+a_2=m$. Let $N=\{i:a_i<0\}$. Such a monomial occurs in the summand for a nonempty index set $J$ precisely when $N\subseteq J$, since only the variables in $J$ are inverted.

If $N$ is empty, the monomial contributes the cochain complex of a full two-simplex: its degree-zero cohomology is $k$ and its higher cohomology vanishes. If $|N|=1$, the dimensions in degrees $0,1,2$ are $1,2,1$; the first map has rank one and the second map has rank one with the same kernel as the first map's image. If $|N|=2$, there is one copy of $k$ in each of degrees $1$ and $2$ and the map between them is an isomorphism. These two cases are acyclic over every field, including characteristic two. If $N=\{0,1,2\}$, only the degree-two term occurs, contributing one copy of $k$. It follows thatand that $H^0(P,{\mathcal{O}}_P)=k$, $H^0(P,{\mathcal{O}}_P(-d))=0$, and $H^2(P,{\mathcal{O}}_P)=0$. Moreover the Laurent-monomial description of top cohomology on projective space gives a basis of $H^2(P,{\mathcal{O}}_P(-d))$ consisting ofFor $d\ge 3$, subtracting one from each $b_i$ counts these as $\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{d-1}{2}\right)$. For $d=1,2$ there are no such triples, and the formula $(d-1)(d-2)/2$ is also zero.

Use the long exact sequence in sheaf cohomology of the initial sequence, and cohomology under a closed immersion to identify the terms for $i_{\ast }{\mathcal{O}}_X$. The vanishings just proved giveThereforeThis proves the cohomology of a projective plane hypersurface without imposing smoothness, irreducibility or reducedness. In particular, the second number is an arithmetic genus, not a claim about the genus of a normalization.

The intersection hypothesis says that $X$ is a semi-separated scheme. For an affine open subscheme $V\subseteq X$, the intersection $V\cap U$ is affine. Restricting the given short exact sequence of sheaves to it and applying the affine module-sheaf equivalence gives an exact sequence of global sections:These are exactly the sections on $V$ of the three direct image sheaves. Affine opens form a basis, and every section of the last sheaf on such a basis open lifts to the middle sheaf. This proves surjectivity as a sheaf morphism; left exactness of direct image supplies the other positions. Hence direct image preserves this short exact sequence. The crucial ingredient is exactness of sections of quasi-coherent sheaves on an affine intersection; arbitrary open immersions need not have this property.

For the cohomology comparison, every nonempty finite intersectionis affine. This follows by mathematical induction, intersecting the affine intersection already obtained with the next affine open. The restriction of $\mathcal{F}$ to it is quasi-coherent, so vanishing of quasi-coherent cohomology on an affine scheme givesWe now prove why this local vanishing gives the acyclic cover theorem, rather than identifying the two sorts of cohomology without a comparison.

Take a flasque resolution $0\to \mathcal{F}\to {\mathcal{I}}^0\to {\mathcal{I}}^1\to \cdots$. Here a flabby sheaf has surjective restriction maps; its restrictions to open subsets are still flabby and have zero higher sheaf cohomology. Form the double complexThe horizontal differential is the alternating restriction map $d_{\mathrm{C}}$; the vertical one $d_{\mathrm{I}}$ is induced by the resolution. They commute, so the total differential in bidegree $(p,q)$ is $d_{\mathrm{C}}+(-1{)}^p{d}_{\mathrm{I}}$ and has square zero. The Čech resolution on a semi-separated scheme uses precisely these intersections.

A flabby sheaf has zero positive Čech cohomology for a finite open cover, and its degree-zero Čech cohomology is its global sections. One way to establish this auxiliary fact is to use the exact augmented two-open complexExactness at the first two terms is the sheaf gluing axiom; the last map is onto because a section on the intersection extends to $V$. For the induction step, write $V$ for the union of all but the last open and $W$ for the last open. Separate Čech cochains according to whether their index list contains the last index. The resulting two-block complex compares the smaller cover of $V$ with its restricted cover of $V\cap W$, together with $\Gamma (W,\mathcal{I})$ in degree zero. By induction those two smaller cover complexes have cohomology only in degree zero, where they give $\Gamma (V,\mathcal{I})$ and $\Gamma (V\cap W,\mathcal{I})$. The displayed two-open exact sequence then gives zero positive-degree cohomology for the full cover. This proves the auxiliary fact by induction on the number of opens. Thus horizontal cohomology of $C^{\bullet ,q}$ consists only of $\Gamma (X,{\mathcal{I}}^q)$ in degree zero. Computing the cohomology of the total complex first horizontally therefore gives $H^n(X,\mathcal{F})$, by the resolution principle for sheaf cohomology.

On the other hand, vertical cohomology issince the restricted flasque resolutions compute cohomology on each intersection. The already established affine vanishing makes all rows with $q>0$ zero. The surviving row $q=0$ is exactly the Čech cochain complex ${\check{C}}^{\bullet }(\mathcal{U},\mathcal{F})$. Computing total cohomology first vertically therefore gives ${\check{H}}^n(\mathcal{U},\mathcal{F})$. These two computations are justified by the two filtrations of the first-quadrant double complex: in every total degree only finitely many terms occur, and the cover also bounds the horizontal degree. Their edge maps give the natural identificationFor negative degrees both groups are zero by convention. In particular, degree zero is the usual identification by the sheaf gluing axiom, not merely a comparison of dimensions.

A sheaf of modules $\mathcal{F}$ over ${\mathcal{O}}_X$ is quasi-coherent when locally it admits a presentationwith arbitrary indexing sets $I,J$. On an affine chart, sheafifying the corresponding module presentation and using exactness of localization identifies its cokernel with a sheaf $\tilde{N}$. Thus one may equivalently require that locally on affine charts $\mathcal{F}$ is associated with a module. This does not impose finite generation, which belongs to the stronger coherent condition.

On the affine variety $X$ with coordinate ring $A$, put $M=\Gamma (X,\mathcal{F})$. Refine local module charts to a finite principal open cover $X={\bigcup }_{j}D(g_j)$ such that $\mathcal{F}{|}_{D(g_j)}\cong {\tilde{N}}_j$ for an $A_{g_j}$-module $N_j$. This is possible because principal opens form an open basis and $X$ is quasi-compact. On the overlap $D(g_j{g}_k)$ the sections are the corresponding further localization of $N_j$ or $N_k$. The sheaf gluing axiom gives an equalizerwhere the last map is the difference of restrictions. For any $f\in A$, localize this sequence. Exactness of localization and commutation with finite products give exactly the equalizer for the cover $D(f)={\bigcup }_{j}D(f{g}_j)$. HenceThe isomorphisms are canonical and commute with all basic-open restrictions. Since the sections of $\tilde{M}$ on these opens are $M_f$, they identify the two sheaves:Conversely $\tilde{M}$ is quasi-coherent for every $A$-module $M$, since a free presentation of $M$ gives the required sheaf presentation. Also $\Gamma (X,\tilde{M})=M$, and module homomorphisms sheafify, while a sheaf morphism is determined on every $D(f)$ by the localization of its map on global sections. This proves the affine module-sheaf equivalence.

For a short exact sequence of quasi-coherent sheaves, the sequence of their stalks is exact. Under this equivalence the stalk at $x$ is the localization of the global-section module at ${\mathfrak{m}}_x$. Exactness of module sequences can be checked at all maximal ideals, by localization detects zero elements applied to their homology, so the global-section modules also form a short exact sequence. Therefore global sections are exact on quasi-coherent sheaves over an affine variety. This is stronger than the left exactness of the global section functor on arbitrary sheaves, and follows from localization, not from assuming the cohomology vanishing still to be proved.

For an open inclusion $j:U\hookrightarrow X$, the requested sheaf isRestriction gives $\mathcal{F}\to {}_U\mathcal{F}$. This direct image from an open restriction is not extension by zero: its stalks outside $U$ may be nonzero.

The locally vanishing principle for sheaf cohomology says that a class $\xi \in H^i(X,\mathcal{F})$, $i>0$, is killed on a suitable neighbourhood of every point. Under the stated hypothesis that basis opens and their finite intersections have zero cohomology in degrees $1,\dots ,i-1$, these neighbourhoods can be chosen in that basis so that the image of $\xi$ underis zero. In particular its restriction in $H^i(U,\mathcal{F}{|}_U)$ is zero. This is a statement about individual classes; it does not assert that every locally vanishing class is already globally zero.

Here is a noncircular proof of vanishing of quasi-coherent cohomology on an affine scheme, applied to the variety. Induct on $i>0$, simultaneously for every affine variety and quasi-coherent sheaf. Assume all lower positive degrees vanish. The principal-open basis is closed under finite intersections, so it satisfies the principle's hypothesis. Given $\xi \in H^i(X,\mathcal{F})$, choose a finite principal cover $\mathcal{U}=(D(f_j))$ on which it restricts to zero.

Applying the Čech cochain complex to a flasque resolution gives the Čech lifting below the first possible local cohomology degree comparison segment, under lower-degree vanishing on all intersectionsFor completeness, the double complex has terms ${\check{C}}^p(\mathcal{U},{\mathcal{I}}^q)$. Its augmented rows are exact because each ${\mathcal{I}}^q$ is flasque, so its total cohomology is the cohomology of global sections of the resolution. The vertical cohomology on intersections in degrees $0<q<i$ is zero. Equivalently, start with local primitives of a cocycle representing $\xi$, take their differences on pairwise overlaps, and solve successively for primitives of those differences in degrees $i-1,i-2,\dots ,1$. The last difference is a Čech $i$-cocycle with values in $\mathcal{F}$. This identifies the kernel of the restriction map with the displayed Čech group. No vanishing in degree $i$ on the intersections has been assumed.

It remains a module calculation. Write $\mathcal{F}=\tilde{M}$. The augmented Čech complex isSince the $D(f_j)$ cover $X$, the $f_j$ generate the unit ideal. This complex is exact. To see it algebraically, use alternating cochains, with repeated indices giving zero. For a cocycle $c$, choose $N$ large enough to clear every $f_j$-denominator in $f_j^N{c}_{jI}$, as well as the finitely many cocycle relations; vanishing criterion in a module localization allows a further power to clear relations which initially hold only after localization. Since the ideal $(f_j^N)$ is still the unit ideal, choose $a_j$ with ${\sum }_j{a}_j{f}_j^N=1$. Defineusing those cleared representatives in $M_{f_I}$. The cocycle identity gives $\delta b=({\sum }_j{a}_j{f}_j^N)c=c$. The same argument with the augmentation gives gluing and uniqueness in degree zero. This is exactness of the unit-ideal localization Čech complex.

Thus ${\check{H}}^i(\mathcal{U},\mathcal{F})=0$, so the class $\xi$, whose restrictions were zero, is zero. The induction starts at $i=1$, when the lower-degree condition is empty. We have proved

For $U_{i_0\dots i_q}=U_{i_0}\cap \cdots \cap U_{i_q}$, the Čech cochain complex has groupsTerms in ${\delta }^2$ cancel in pairs, and Čech cohomology is $\ker \delta /\mathrm{im}\delta$. A degree-zero cocycle is exactly a family of compatible local sections. The sheaf gluing axiom gives their unique global section, proving ${\check{H}}^0(\mathcal{U},\mathcal{F})\cong \mathcal{F}(X)$. If the cover has affine finite intersections, a quasi-coherent sheaf has no higher cohomology on those intersections by vanishing of quasi-coherent cohomology on an affine scheme. The acyclic cover theorem then identifies all Čech groups with sheaf cohomology. In particular, a finite affine open cover of a separated variety has this property.

For the sheaf of units of the structure sheaf, a multiplicative degree-one cocycle is a family $g_{ij}\in {\mathcal{O}}_X^{\ast }(U_i\cap U_j)$ satisfying $g_{ij}{g}_{jk}=g_{ik}$, with $g_{ji}=g_{ij}^{-1}$. It glues trivial rank-one free modules into an invertible sheaf. Changing the local frames multiplies $g_{ij}$ by a coboundary, and two sets of transition data give isomorphic line bundles precisely when their cocycles differ this way. Tensoring line bundles multiplies their cocycles. Thus line bundles trivialized by an open cover give the group isomorphismFor the remaining arguments, work over the algebraically closed ground field. On the irreducible variety $V$, put $\mathcal{Q}={\mathcal{K}}^{\ast }/{\mathcal{O}}_V^{\ast }$, a quotient of sheaves of abelian groups. A global section of $\mathcal{Q}$ is locally represented by rational functions $f_i$ whose ratios are regular units. The corresponding unit cocycle $f_j/f_i$ defines an invertible sheaf. A single global rational function has trivial cocycle. Conversely, every line bundle has a nonzero rational section: choose a nonzero vector in its one-dimensional fibre at the generic point and express it in local frames. This supplies such local $f_i$. If the associated line bundle is trivial, changing frames makes all $f_i$ restrictions of one rational function. Thereforeis exact. This is the Cartier-divisor description of the Picard group. The sheaf of nonzero rational functions on an irreducible variety is flasque, since all restrictions between nonempty open sets are the identity on $k(V{)}^{\ast }$. Apply the long exact sequence in sheaf cohomology to $1\to {\mathcal{O}}_V^{\ast }\to {\mathcal{K}}^{\ast }\to \mathcal{Q}\to 1$. Since $H^1(V,{\mathcal{K}}^{\ast })=0$, its connecting map has exactly the cokernel just computed, provingFinally the Segre description of a smooth quadric surface identifies $V$ with ${\mathbb{P}}^1\times {\mathbb{P}}^1$. The two rulings of a smooth quadric surface have classes $F_1,F_2$ generating $\mathrm{Pic}(V)\cong {\mathbb{Z}}^2$. For completeness, remove one line in each ruling: the remaining chart is the affine plane, with factorial coordinate ring $k[s,t]$ and trivial divisor class group. The localization sequence for the divisor class group makes $F_1,F_2$ generators, and their degrees on the two ruling lines prove independence. The hyperplane class, and hence the conic $C$, has bidegree $(1,1)$. By Picard-group localization on a smooth variety, the Picard group of a smooth affine quadric surface isExplicitly, the restriction of ${\mathcal{O}}_V(1,0)$ is nontrivial: if it were trivial on $U$, its rational trivialization would have divisor supported on $C$, forcing $(1,0)$ to be an integer multiple of $(1,1)$, which is impossible.

For the usual additive Čech cohomology groups, $\mathcal{F}$ is understood to be a sheaf of abelian groups. Order the index set of the open cover $\mathfrak{U}=(U_i)$. The Čech cochain group isAn empty intersection contributes the zero group. The Čech coboundary is the alternating sum of restriction maps:Every double omission appears twice with opposite sign, so ${\delta }^2=0$. The Čech cohomology is the cohomology of this cochain complex:Here ${\check{C}}^{-1}=0$. The sheaf gluing axiom identifies ${\check{H}}^0(\mathfrak{U},\mathcal{F})$ with $\Gamma (X,\mathcal{F})$. This definition is for the fixed cover; no limit over refinements is part of the group requested here. Without the abelian-group structure, this additive Čech cochain complex is not defined.