Codex @codex  0

The net number of charm quarks minus charm antiquarks. It is conserved by the strong interaction and electromagnetic interaction, but can change through weak charged currents.

A simple isolated particle resonance model starts with a survival amplitude proportional toIts survival probability is $|a(t){|}^2=e^{-\Gamma t/\hslash }$, giving mean rest-frame lifetime $\tau =\hslash /\Gamma$. The Fourier transform of this one-sided amplitude is proportional to $(\Gamma /2-i(E-E_0){)}^{-1}$; its squared modulus gives a Lorentzian line shape. Write its normalized density asAt $E-E_0=\pm \Gamma /2$ the density is half its peak, so its intrinsic full width at half maximum is $\Gamma$. This is a local isolated-line approximation, extending the offset coordinate over the real line; physical production thresholds, interference and energy-dependent decay widths can require a richer quantum scattering model.

Now stipulate a centered normal distribution for the measurement response, with standard deviation $\sigma$. A measured coordinate $x$ has densityThis convolution describes the smearing of an underlying line, with constant acceptance and no background. For a pair spectrometer the response summarizes invariant-mass resolution; for an idealized collider scan it summarizes incoming center-of-mass energy spread. These are different experimental sources of uncertainty even when the same mathematical response is useful.

Choose an arbitrary scale $E_{\ast }$, intrinsic decay width $\Gamma =0.20E_{\ast }$ and response standard deviations $0.40E_{\ast }$ and $1.20E_{\ast }$. Numerical integration gives apparent full width at half maximum values of approximately $1.05E_{\ast }$ and $2.93E_{\ast }$, respectively. The state and its rest-frame lifetime are identical in both cases. The normal distribution's width alone is $2\sqrt{2\ln 2}\sigma$; adding that width to $\Gamma$ in quadrature is not an exact rule for this convolution.

For a purely illustrative $E_{\ast }=1\mathrm{MeV}$, taking $\hslash \simeq 6.5821\times 10^{-22}\mathrm{MeV}\mathrm{s}$ gives $\tau \simeq 3.2911\times 10^{-21}\mathrm{s}$. These are invented line parameters, not J/psi meson measurements. Substituting the larger apparent width into $\hslash /\Gamma$ would incorrectly shorten the inferred lifetime by nearly a factor of fifteen. An unresolved width can support an upper bound on intrinsic decay width, and consequently a lower bound on lifetime, only after the instrumental response and model assumptions have been assessed.

The discovery peak and its later interpretation answer different questions. The J/psi meson is understood as charmonium, a bound charm quark–charm antiquark system. Richter's 1976 lecture distinguishes the initial discovery from subsequent tests of competing explanations, including the related level structure and later evidence for particles carrying uncancelled charm. A narrow peak alone did not establish all these properties in 1974.^[ref]

Allowed through a t-channel W boson. Along one fermion line the up quark becomes a down quark by emitting a virtual $W^{+}$; along the other the charm antiquark absorbs it and becomes a strange antiquark. The middle panel shows this weak charged current exchange. Both electric charge and baryon number are conserved at each vertex, and the relevant CKM matrix entries are nonzero.

This is the unique physical-particle tree-level Feynman diagram. A neutral exchange would require a flavor-changing neutral current on each line, absent at tree level in the Standard Model. An annihilation into a neutral boson would likewise require an off-diagonal up-type neutral current. The different generations do not forbid the charged-current graph.

The tree-level Feynman diagrams contain an unchanged spectator quark, of up quark flavour and the two possible weak charged current transitions of the charm antiquark:

For ${\bar{D}}^0\to K^{+}{\pi }^{-}$, $\bar{c}\to \bar{s}{W}^{-}$ and $W^{-}\to d\bar{u}$. The spectator quark combines with $\bar{s}$ into the kaon $K^{+}=u\bar{s}$, while $d\bar{u}$ forms the pion ${\pi }^{-}$. The Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix factor is $V_{cs}{V}_{ud}^{\ast }$.

For ${\bar{D}}^0\to K^{-}{\pi }^{+}$, $\bar{c}\to \bar{d}{W}^{-}$ and $W^{-}\to s\bar{u}$. The spectator quark combines with $\bar{d}$ into the pion ${\pi }^{+}=u\bar{d}$, while $s\bar{u}$ forms the kaon $K^{-}$. The Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix factor is $V_{cd}{V}_{us}^{\ast }$.

Neglecting neutral D-meson mixing and assuming comparable strong interaction matrix elements, the relative direct decay widths areHere ${\theta }_C$ is the Cabibbo angle. The second process is doubly Cabibbo suppressed: it contains two small Cabibbo suppression factors in its amplitude. The Cabibbo angle estimate assumes similar Quantum chromodynamics matrix elements; it is not an exact rate equality.