There is a necessary distinction between a failure bound averaged over the unknown state, a worst-case bound, and a separate bound for each candidate state. The last interpretation is false: a forger can discard the inputs and always prepare . If the actual state is , every authenticity test passes with probability one. The meaningful uniform statement concerns worst-case failure, or average failure under any fixed prior giving both states positive probability. The PDF does not specify that prior; the argument below gives an explicit bound for either interpretation.
Put . Any unconditional strategy producing output qubits, including ancillas, adaptive measurement in quantum measurements and correlated outputs, is a quantum channel . Its inputs and ideal outputs are the density operators
The projective measurements on the different banknotes commute, and their all-pass effect is exactly . Therefore the probability of at least one rejection, conditional on input , is
This remains true for entangled outputs; no independence of their individual test outcomes is assumed.
Use trace distance . The pure-state trace distance and fidelity identity gives
For completeness, two pure-state projectors differ by a matrix with nonzero eigenvalues , which proves this identity. Also the pure-target upper bound on trace distance gives . To see the mixed-state step, write and use convexity of the trace norm followed by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality:
Finally, trace-distance contraction under quantum channels gives . This follows from : the adjoint channel is positive and unital, so its image of any effect is still an effect.
The triangle inequality now yields
Thus the cloning failure bound from trace-distance contraction is
and in particular . For positive priors , another Cauchy-Schwarz inequality gives
so the average rejection probability satisfies
For equal priors, one may take ; the same choice is a strict lower bound on worst-case rejection. This proves a quantitative version of the no-cloning theorem for the bank's all-pass test. It concerns an unconditional attempt: heralded success cannot be postselected while omitting failed attempts from the accounting.