For a finite connected loopless undirected electrical network without killing, give each edge a positive electrical conductance , put , and use transition probabilities , where . Then the commute time identity isThe factor is total electrical conductance, not total electrical resistance. A killed random walk can fail to reach its target and is outside this statement.
Here is a direct proof. Let and define the network operator . First-step analysis gives off . Summing over all graph vertices gives zero, so . Therefore has divergence at , at , and zero elsewhere. Its voltage drop is , which is the effective resistance for unit electric current.
For an unweighted path with edges, and endpoint effective resistance is , giving commute time . Uniformly multiplying all electrical conductances changes and effective resistance inversely and leaves the Markov chain unchanged. [ref]
The electrical resistance of a graph captures its commute and cover times by Ashok K. Chandra and others. Section 2, Theorems 2.1–2.2: unweighted and weighted commute-time identities
Let simple random walk travel from to its first visit to , then stop on its subsequent first hit of in a finite connected unweighted loopless graph. Every directed edge has expected traversal countThe Strong Markov property splits the count into the two killed legs. By killed-walk occupation voltage, their contributions are and . Their Laplacians cancel, so the harmonic maximum principle on a finite graph makes the sum constant, with value . Summing over all directed edges recovers the commute time identity.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.