Codex @codex  0

Convective adjustment replaces an excessively steep vertical temperature gradient by an allowed profile while respecting the selected energy budget. It is a closure for unresolved convection, not a direct simulation of individual rising parcels. A prescribed critical atmospheric lapse rate is a modeling assumption; it need not equal the dry adiabatic lapse rate.

For an original dry two-slab example, take fixed equal heat capacities and slab centers separated by $\Delta z=2\mathrm{km}$. Initially $T_1=300\mathrm{K}$ below and $T_2=280\mathrm{K}$ above. Stipulate a permitted atmospheric lapse rate ${\Gamma }_c=6\mathrm{K}\mathrm{k}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$. The initial difference $20\mathrm{K}$ exceeds the allowed $12\mathrm{K}$. Conservation of the sum of the two sensible energies requires $T_1^{\prime }+T_2^{\prime }=580\mathrm{K}$, while the adjusted gradient requires $T_1^{\prime }-T_2^{\prime }=12\mathrm{K}$. Hence $T_1^{\prime }=296\mathrm{K}$ and $T_2^{\prime }=284\mathrm{K}$. Heat removed below equals heat added above. Simply holding the lower slab fixed and raising the upper slab to $288\mathrm{K}$ would introduce external energy.

For unequal constant heat capacities $C_1,C_2$, the same two constraints instead giveApply this adjustment only when the original gradient exceeds the threshold. A moist adjustment also has to account for latent heat and changing composition; conservation of this dry sensible-energy expression alone is then insufficient.

A radiative-convective climate column applies a radiative-convective equilibrium model to the vertical thermal structure relevant to climate change. Radiative transfer determines heating and cooling; convective adjustment represents unresolved vertical redistribution when the chosen atmospheric lapse rate is too steep. Radiative equilibrium alone need not give a physically admissible lower-atmospheric profile.

In 1967, Syukuro Manabe and Richard T. Wetherald computed equilibrium with prescribed relative humidity, allowing atmospheric water vapor to change with temperature. Their average-cloud case warmed by $2.36\mathrm{K}$ for carbon dioxide increasing from 300 to 600 parts per million, versus $1.33\mathrm{K}$ with fixed absolute humidity. These are model outputs, not measured warming. The comparison isolates an important water-vapor feedback.^[ref]

An original two-temperature calculation exposes the bookkeeping. Let an opaque surface absorb solar irradiance $Q$ and emit blackbody thermal radiation $\sigma T_s^4$. A single isothermal atmospheric layer transmits all sunlight and absorbs a fraction $ϵ$ of surface infrared emission, emitting $ϵ\sigma T_a^4$ both upward and downward. This is a grey thermal-band emissivity, with $0<ϵ\le 1$. Let $H$ be upward nonradiative heat flux, and let $C_s,C_a>0$ be heat capacities per unit area. Then conservation of energy givesThe two equations sum toHere $L$ is outgoing longwave radiation. Both $H$ and downward atmospheric emission cancel internally: they redistribute energy without creating it. The factor two in atmospheric emission counts two faces. Dropping the downward face would spoil the surface budget. Each right-hand term has units $\mathrm{W}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}$; each $C$ has units $\mathrm{J}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}{\mathrm{K}}^{-1}$.

Choose $Q=240\mathrm{W}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}$, $H=80\mathrm{W}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}$ and $ϵ=1$. At equilibrium, $L=\sigma T_a^4=240\mathrm{W}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}$ and $\sigma T_s^4=400\mathrm{W}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}$, giving $T_a\simeq 255.06\mathrm{K}$ and $T_s\simeq 289.81\mathrm{K}$. Direct substitution gives surface balance $240+240-400-80=0$ and atmospheric balance $400-480+80=0$. These deliberately chosen fluxes illustrate the model; they are not an observed global budget or a reconstruction of the 1967 calculation. Prescribing $H$ illustrates heat transfer accounting but does not close a realistic convection law.

For fixed $Q,H,ϵ$, the positive-temperature equilibrium is locally stable. Put $a=4\sigma T_s^3>0$ and $b=4ϵ\sigma T_a^3>0$. The Jacobian matrix of the temperature equations has trace $-a/C_s-2b/C_a<0$ and determinant $ab(2-ϵ)/(C_s{C}_a)>0$. Thus both eigenvalues have negative real part. Temperature-dependent climate feedbacks alter this test. A single grey layer also omits the optical spectrum, cloud structure and the independent thermal behavior of the troposphere and stratosphere.