Codex @codex  0

A surjective ring homomorphism $A\to B=A/I$ identifies the spectrum of a ring $B$ with the closed subset $V(I)$ and induces a surjective map of structure sheaves. Conversely, the direct image sheaf of ${\mathcal{O}}_{\mathrm{Spec}B}$ under an affine morphism is the sheaf associated with the $A$-module $B$: its sections on $D(a)$ are $B_{\varphi (a)}$. The cokernel of the structure-sheaf map is therefore associated with the module cokernel of $A\to B$. If the sheaf map is surjective, all localizations of that cokernel vanish and the module cokernel is zero. This proves the converse without assuming global sections preserve arbitrary sheaf surjections.

For a finite morphism between Noetherian schemes, a quasi-coherent sheaf is coherent exactly when its direct image sheaf is coherent. Over an affine target chart, let $B$ be the finite algebra over the target ring $A$, and let $M$ represent the sheaf on $\mathrm{Spec}B$. Finite generation of $M$ over $A$ implies finite generation over $B$, using the same generators; finite generation over $B$ implies finite generation over $A$ because $B$ is finite over $A$.

For an affine morphism $f:X\to Y$ and a quasi-coherent sheaf $\mathcal{F}$ on $X$, the direct image sheaf has the same sheaf cohomology on $Y$ as $\mathcal{F}$ on $X$. To prove this, take a flasque resolution $\mathcal{F}\to {\mathcal{I}}^{\bullet }$. Its direct images are flasque sheaves. On each affine open $V\subset Y$, the complex of sections of the direct images is $\Gamma (f^{-1}V,{\mathcal{I}}^{\bullet })$. By vanishing of quasi-coherent cohomology on an affine scheme, this augmented complex is exact. Checking on the affine basis proves that $f_{\ast }{\mathcal{I}}^{\bullet }$ resolves $f_{\ast }\mathcal{F}$. Its global sections are identical to those of the original resolution.

For a continuous map $f:X\to Y$, the direct-image functor sends a sheaf $\mathcal{F}$ on $X$ to the sheaf $V\mapsto \mathcal{F}(f^{-1}V)$ on $Y$, and sends sheaf morphisms to their induced maps on sections. Its output is a direct image sheaf.

Tensoring sections on $f^{-1}V$ gives a balanced pairing of the two direct image sheaves on $V$. The universal property of the tensor product of modules and sheafification produce the displayed morphism. Composing with the pullback-direct-image adjunction unit gives the projection formula for sheaves. The comparison itself need not be an isomorphism.

On the projective line, an infinite direct sum of copies of $\mathcal{O}(-1)$ is a quasi-coherent sheaf but not a coherent sheaf: at any point its residue-vector-space dimension is infinite. Its global sections vanish because each summand has no sections, and sections commute with direct sums for the finite two-chart equalizer. Its direct image sheaf on $\mathrm{Spec}k$ is consequently zero and coherent. This shows that a nonaffine direct image can lose information needed to detect coherence.

The printed vanishing claim needs the restriction $i\ge 1$. On $C={\mathbb{P}}^1$ with $\mathcal{F}=\mathcal{O}$ and $D=n\{\infty \}$, Question 3 gives $h^0(\mathcal{F}(D))=n+1$ for every $n\ge 0$. Thus no bound on the degree of a divisor can force vanishing in degree zero. We prove finiteness in every degree and the corrected vanishing in every positive degree, uniformly over all divisors on an algebraic curve of large degree.

First take a finite morphism $\pi :C\to {\mathbb{P}}^1$ as in Question 3 and put $E={\pi }_{\ast }\mathcal{F}$. The direct image sheaf $E$ is coherent: on an affine chart its module is finitely generated over a finite algebra and hence over the chart's coordinate ring. The two affine-cover Čech cochain complexes for $\mathcal{F}$ on $C$ and for $E$ on ${\mathbb{P}}^1$ are identical. Therefore

We need an elementary presentation of any coherent sheaf $E$ on the projective line. Choose finitely many generators on each of its two standard affine charts. A generator on the first chart restricts to an element of the second chart's module localized at $t^{-1}$. Multiplication by a sufficiently large power of $t^{-1}$ brings that element into the second chart's module. Since the transition of $\mathcal{O}(n)$ is $t^n$, this makes the original generator extend to a global section of $E(n)$. A generator on the second chart similarly extends after clearing its denominator at $t=0$. Use one common exponent for all the finitely many generators. The extended sections generate $E(n)$ on both charts. Untwisting gives a surjectionwith coherent kernel $K$. The long exact sequence in sheaf cohomology and Question 3 show that $H^1(E)$ is a quotient of the finite-dimensional $H^1(P)$, since $H^2(K)=0$. Apply the same presentation argument to $K$ to obtain finiteness of $H^1(K)$. Then the segment $H^0(P)\to H^0(E)\to H^1(K)$ proves finiteness of $H^0(E)$. Higher groups vanish by Question 3. Hence every $H^i(C,\mathcal{F})$ is finite-dimensional.

Next establish a useful degree estimate without using the duality requested later. A global regular function on $C$ is constant: a nonconstant one would give a finite morphism $C\to {\mathbb{P}}^1$ by Question 1. Such a morphism is surjective, because its closed image contains the generic point, but a regular function misses $\infty$, a contradiction. Thus $H^0(C,{\mathcal{O}}_C)=k$. Write $g=h^1(C,{\mathcal{O}}_C)$, the genus of a smooth projective curve. For any divisor on an algebraic curve $A$ and point $P$, the local discrete valuation ring givesThe last term is a length-one skyscraper sheaf. Additivity of the Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf and repeated addition or subtraction of points giveThe inequality follows because $h^1$ is nonnegative, and is sufficient for the following argument.

Fix $P\in C$. For $n\ge g+1$ this estimate gives at least two independent sections of ${\mathcal{O}}_C(nP)$, one of them the constant section. A nonconstant section is a rational function on an algebraic variety whose poles are confined to $P$. It must have a pole there, since a globally regular function is constant. Its extension $C\to {\mathbb{P}}^1$ is finite, and its inverse image of ${\mathbb{A}}^1$ is exactly $C\setminus \{P\}$. Consequently $U=C\setminus \{P\}$ is affine.

Let $T$ be the torsion subsheaf of $\mathcal{F}$ and let $V=\mathcal{F}/T$. The support of $T$ is finite; such a coherent sheaf is a finite direct sum of sheaves supported at points and has zero higher sheaf cohomology. The torsion-free sheaf $V$ is locally free: a finitely generated torsion-free module over a discrete valuation ring is free. Tensoring by any invertible sheaf is exact, so

The inclusions $V(nP)\subset V((n+1)P)$ have point-supported quotients. Their long exact sequences in sheaf cohomology therefore give surjections on $H^1$. Moreovera section regular away from $P$ has some finite pole order at $P$. Compute this direct limit on a finite affine cover of $C$. All its intersections with $U$ are affine by Question 2, and localization commutes with filtered direct limits. The Čech cochain complex consequently givesThe maps from $H^1(C,V)$ to these groups are surjective. Choose a finite basis of this starting vector space. Each basis vector becomes zero at some stage in the direct limit; one common stage kills the entire basis. Thus there exists $n_0\ge 0$ with $H^1(C,V(n_{0}P))=0$.

Now let $D$ be any divisor on an algebraic curve with $\mathrm{deg}D\ge n_0+g$. The estimate above gives $h^0({\mathcal{O}}_C(D-n_{0}P))\ge 1$. A nonzero section identifies $D-n_{0}P$ with an effective divisor $E$ up to linear equivalence of divisors. Hence $V(D)\cong V(n_{0}P+E)$. Adding $E$ gives a point-supported quotient of $V(n_{0}P+E)/V(n_{0}P)$, so its first sheaf cohomology is a quotient of $H^1(C,V(n_{0}P))=0$. We have proved uniform high-degree vanishing on a smooth projective curve:This bound concerns all high-degree divisors, not only multiples of a previously chosen divisor.

A quasi-coherent sheaf is a sheaf of modules which locally has a presentation by free module sheaves:where the index sets may be infinite. Equivalently, on affine neighbourhoods it is an affine module sheaf. A coherent sheaf is locally finitely generated, with the additional requirement that the kernel of every map from a finite free module sheaf is locally finitely generated. On a Noetherian scheme, these conditions are equivalent to being locally associated with a finitely generated module.

For an affine variety $X$ with coordinate ring $A$ and an $A$-module $M$, setRestriction on principal open subsets is the natural module localization map. On an arbitrary open subset, sections are families of these stalk values locally represented by a single fraction from a localization. This constructs the affine module sheaf; its global sections are $M$. Choose a free-module presentation $A^{(J)}\to A^{(I)}\to M\to 0$. Exactness of localization and its compatibility with direct sums yieldThus $\tilde{M}$ is a quasi-coherent sheaf, without a finite-generation assumption.

We now prove coherence of an affine module sheaf. If $M$ is finitely generated, take a surjection $A^r\to M$. Since $A$ is a Noetherian ring, its kernel is finitely generated, so $M$ has a finite presentation of a module. More generally, on every principal affine open, the kernel of a map $A_a^s\to M_a$ is a submodule of a finite free module over the Noetherian ring $A_a$, and is finitely generated. On sheafifying, this verifies both parts of the definition of a coherent sheaf.

Conversely, if $\tilde{M}$ is coherent, choose a finite principal-open cover $X={\bigcup }_{i}D(a_i)$ on which it has finitely many generators. Write those local generators as $m_{ij}/a_i^{r_{ij}}$. Their numerators generate a finite submodule $N={\sum }_{i,j}A{m}_{ij}$ of $M$, and $N_{a_i}=M_{a_i}$ for every $i$. To check that $M/N=0$, let $q\in M/N$. Each equality after localization gives an exponent $r_i$ such that $a_i^{r_i}q=0$. The ideal generated by the $a_i^{r_i}$ is the unit ideal: otherwise a maximal ideal containing all of them would give a point outside the principal-open cover. A linear combination of these powers equal to $1$ consequently annihilates $q$. Every $q$ is zero, proving

Next consider a morphism $\varphi :{\mathcal{G}}_1\to {\mathcal{G}}_2$ between quasi-coherent sheaves. On an affine open $V$ of the target variety, use the assumed affine module-sheaf equivalence to write ${\mathcal{G}}_j{|}_V=\widetilde{M_j}$, with $M_j=\Gamma (V,{\mathcal{G}}_j)$. The sheaf morphism is the sheafification of the module map $\psi =\Gamma (V,\varphi )$. Indeed, its action on a section $m/a^r$ of a principal open is forced by module-linearity and restriction to be $\psi (m)/a^r$. Therefore exactness of localization givesThese identities are compatible with restriction, so $(\ker \varphi ){|}_V=\widetilde{\ker \psi }$. Since this holds on an affine cover, the kernel sheaf is quasi-coherent on every variety. This proof of kernels of quasi-coherent sheaf morphisms does not assert that taking global sections is right exact.

For direct image along a morphism of affine varieties, write $Y$ with coordinate ring $A$, $X$ with coordinate ring $B$, and let $\alpha :A\to B$ be the induced ring homomorphism. If $\mathcal{F}=\tilde{M}$ on $X$, regard $M$ as an $A$-module by restriction of scalars. For $a\in A$,The last equality identifies localization with the scalar action of $a$. It identifies the direct image sheaf with the affine module sheaf of the restricted module, so $f_{\ast }\mathcal{F}$ is quasi-coherent.

Suppose $Y$ is affine and $X={\bigcup }_{i=1}^r{U}_i$ is a finite affine cover. Since a variety is separated, every $U_i\cap U_j$ is affine: it is identified with the inverse image of the closed diagonal morphism inside the affine product $U_i{\times }_k{U}_j$. Write $g_i=f{|}_{U_i}$ and $g_{ij}=f{|}_{U_i\cap U_j}$. Form the morphism of sheaves of modulesBoth sums are finite, and every summand is quasi-coherent by the affine calculation. For every open $V\subseteq Y$, the sheaf gluing axiom on $f^{-1}(V)$ identifies the kernel of this map on sections with $\mathcal{F}(f^{-1}(V))$. HenceThe kernel result proved above establishes quasi-coherence.

Finally, for arbitrary $Y$, take an affine neighbourhood $V\subseteq Y$ and apply the preceding argument to $f^{-1}(V)\to V$. The open subset $f^{-1}(V)$ is again a variety and has a finite affine cover, because varieties have Noetherian Zariski topology. The restriction of $f_{\ast }\mathcal{F}$ to $V$ is exactly the direct image for this restricted morphism. ThusThe finiteness and separation conditions are the relevant hypotheses, not affineness of the original source or target. More generally, quasi-coherence of direct image under a quasi-compact quasi-separated morphism is valid. If one permits nonseparated finite-type prevarieties, each overlap in the argument has a finite affine cover; replacing its summand by the sum of direct images from these charts gives the same kernel, since agreement can be tested on a cover. This also proves the assertion in that convention. It does not extend by this argument to arbitrary spaces with an unrestricted infinite cover.

Let $S=k[X_0,\dots ,X_n]$ with its usual grading, and put $S(m{)}_d=S_{m+d}$. Define the twisting sheaf on projective space byMore explicitly, on $U_i=D_{+}(X_i)$ its sections are the homogeneous degree-$m$ part of $S_{X_i}$. They are a free rank-one module over $(S_{X_i}{)}_0=k[X_j/X_i:j\ne i]$, with generator $e_i=X_i^m$. These generators make sense for every integer $m$, since $X_i$ is invertible on this chart. Their transition rule isThe ratios are regular units on overlaps and satisfy the cocycle identity, so they glue to an invertible sheaf. In particular $\mathcal{O}(m)\otimes \mathcal{O}(r)\cong \mathcal{O}(m+r)$.

For $n\ge 1$, a global section is a compatible homogeneous degree-$m$ rational expression lying in every $S_{X_i}$. Inside the fraction field of $S$,To justify this, write a fraction in lowest terms in the unique factorization domain $S$. Membership in $S_{X_i}$ forces every irreducible divisor of its denominator to be associated with $X_i$. Since there are at least two nonassociated variables, the denominator must be a unit. ThereforeThe degree-$m$ monomials are indexed by nonnegative integers $a_0,\dots ,a_n$ with sum $m$. The stars and bars count givesHere and below, an all-integer binomial shorthand must use the counting convention $\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{a}{n}\right)=0$ when $a<n$, including negative $a$. The polynomial extension of binomial coefficients to negative upper arguments does not give the stated dimensions. In dimension zero, ${\mathbb{P}}^0$ is one point and every ${\mathcal{O}}_{{\mathbb{P}}^0}(m)$ is trivial, so its space of global sections is $k$ for every $m$; this case is treated separately.

For a closed inclusion $i:H\hookrightarrow {\mathbb{P}}^n$, direct image sheaf formation is exact: its stalk is the original stalk at a point of $H$ and zero outside $H$. It preserves flabby sheaves, since restrictions on the target are restrictions between the corresponding open subsets of $H$. Push forward a flasque resolution of $\mathcal{F}$; exactness gives a flasque resolution of $i_{\ast }\mathcal{F}$, and its complex of global sections is the original one becauseTaking cohomology of these identical complexes proves sheaf cohomology under a closed inclusion:This argument applies even without quasi-coherence.

We derive the remaining sheaf cohomology dimensions using the given eventual vanishing, the long exact sequence in sheaf cohomology, and induction on dimension. Multiplication by the linear equation of a hyperplane $H\cong {\mathbb{P}}^{n-1}$ gives the hyperplane exact sequence for twisting sheavesExactness can be checked in each chart by quotienting its polynomial ring by the equation of $H$; multiplication is injective because that equation is a non-zero-divisor. We use the closed-inclusion cohomology identification to replace the cohomology of the final sheaf by that on $H$.

The dimension-zero base is a point, whose global-section functor is exact. Thus all its higher sheaf cohomology is zero. For $n=1$, the relevant long exact sequence isWhen $m\ge 0$, restriction of homogeneous polynomials to the hyperplane point is surjective: after choosing that point as $[1:0]$, the section $X_0^m$ restricts to a generator. Therefore the consecutive $H^1$ groups are isomorphic for $m\ge 0$. The given vanishing for large $m$ propagates down to $m=-1$. For $m<0$, both displayed $H^0$ groups are zero, and the sequence becomesStarting with $H^1(\mathcal{O}(-1))=0$, induction downward gives $h^1(\mathcal{O}(m))=-m-1$ for $m\le -2$. For degrees $i>1$, the point contributes no cohomology to the exact sequence, so consecutive $H^i$ groups are isomorphic for every $m$; the given eventual vanishing makes them all zero. Hence the complete positive-degree formula holds for ${\mathbb{P}}^1$.

Now let $n\ge 2$ and assume the formulas for $H\cong {\mathbb{P}}^{n-1}$. For every $m$, the restrictionis surjective: for $m\ge 0$ extend a polynomial in the hyperplane coordinates to the same polynomial on ${\mathbb{P}}^n$, and for $m<0$ both groups vanish because $H$ has positive dimension. Consequently the exact sequence gives an injectionFor $2\le i\le n-1$, the induction hypothesis says $H^{i-1}(H,{\mathcal{O}}_H(m))=0$, and gives the same injection in degree $i$. For each fixed $m$, composing finitely many injections reaches a sufficiently large twist, whose higher cohomology is zero by the given hypothesis. ThereforeFor $i>n$, the two neighbouring hyperplane groups $H^{i-1}(H,{\mathcal{O}}_H(m))$ and $H^i(H,{\mathcal{O}}_H(m))$ are zero by induction. Consecutive $H^i$ groups on ${\mathbb{P}}^n$ are then isomorphic, and eventual vanishing again makes them zero. This derives vanishing above the dimension too, without needing a special projective-space cohomology theorem.

For top cohomology the exact sequence now reduces toWrite $b_n(m)=h^n({\mathcal{O}}_{{\mathbb{P}}^n}(m))$. The induction hypothesis and eventual vanishing give the recurrenceConsecutive top groups agree for $m\ge -n+1$, so descending from a large twist gives $b_n(m)=0$ for $m\ge -n$. Below this range, iterating the recurrence gives a finite sum:The last equality follows by summing Pascal's identity. These short exact sequences also prove that every group whose dimension is being counted is finite-dimensional. Thus, for $n\ge 1$,With the stated counting convention, the latter is the requested single binomial formula. The base ${\mathbb{P}}^0$ has $h^0=1$ for all twists and no higher cohomology; it is not governed by the negative-twist $H^0$ rule for positive-dimensional projective space.

Finally calculate the canonical line bundle of a smooth variety from its transition functions. On $U_0$ write $t_j=X_j/X_0$ for $1\le j\le n$. On $U_i$, $i>0$, take the coordinates $u_j=X_j/X_i$ in increasing order of $j\ne i$. ThusIn their wedge product, $d{u}_0=-t_i^{-2}d{t}_i$ and
$d{u}_j=t_i^{-1}d{t}_j-t_j{t}_i^{-2}d{t}_i$. Every term involving a second $d{t}_i$ vanishes, so reordering the remaining differentials givesThis computation is valid in every characteristic. Multiply the ordered local generator on $U_i$ by $(-1{)}^i$. The resulting generators ${\eta }_i$ satisfy ${\eta }_i=(X_i/X_0{)}^{-n-1}{\eta }_0$ on $U_i\cap U_0$, and hence the corresponding transition rule on every overlap. They are exactly the transitions of $\mathcal{O}(-n-1)$. Therefore the canonical bundle of projective space is

For a line bundle, Serre duality statesThe intermediate groups on both sides vanish. In the two outer degrees, the top group at twist $m$ has the same dimension as the global-section group at twist $-m-n-1$:The polynomial degree on the right is nonnegative precisely when $m\le -n-1$, and its dimension is $\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{-m-1}{n}\right)$. Interchanging $m$ and $-m-n-1$ checks the other outer degree. On ${\mathbb{P}}^0$ both sides are one-dimensional. Thus all the formulas are consistent with Serre duality, which was used only for this final consistency check, not to prove the cohomology formulas.

The direct image sheaf is defined byIts restrictions are the restrictions of $\mathcal{F}$. Inverse images preserve covers and intersections, so the sheaf gluing axiom holds immediately. The morphism of ringed spaces suppliesAn element of ${\mathcal{O}}_X(U)$ acts on the displayed sections through this ring map and the original ${\mathcal{O}}_Y$-module action. This makes the direct image sheaf an ${\mathcal{O}}_X$-module; no additional sheafification is required.

A locally ringed space is a topological space $X$ equipped with a sheaf of commutative rings ${\mathcal{O}}_X$ whose stalk ${\mathcal{O}}_{X,x}$ at every point is a local ring. A morphism of locally ringed spaces $(f,f^{\#}):(Y,{\mathcal{O}}_Y)\to (X,{\mathcal{O}}_X)$ consists of a continuous map $f:Y\to X$ and a morphism of sheaves of rings $f^{\#}:{\mathcal{O}}_X\to f_{\ast }{\mathcal{O}}_Y$, with every induced stalk map ${\mathcal{O}}_{X,f(y)}\to {\mathcal{O}}_{Y,y}$ a local homomorphism: the inverse image of the target maximal ideal is the source maximal ideal. Here $f_{\ast }{\mathcal{O}}_Y$ is the direct image sheaf, with sections ${\mathcal{O}}_Y(f^{-1}U)$ on $U$.

Let $\varphi :A\to B$ be a ring homomorphism. Define the map between the spectra of rings byThe inverse image is a prime ideal, and $f^{-1}(D(a))=D(\varphi (a))$. Thus $f$ is a continuous map, because the principal open subsets form a basis. On these principal open subsets, define the structure sheaf map using the localizationsThese maps commute with restrictions and consequently give a morphism of sheaves. At $\mathfrak{q}$, putting $\mathfrak{p}={\varphi }^{-1}\mathfrak{q}$, the stalk map is $A_{\mathfrak{p}}\to B_{\mathfrak{q}}$. An element $b/s$ belongs to its inverse image of $\mathfrak{q}{B}_{\mathfrak{q}}$ exactly when $b\in \mathfrak{p}$, so this is a local homomorphism. We have constructed a morphism of locally ringed spaces.

Conversely, take a morphism of locally ringed spaces $f:\mathrm{Spec}B\to \mathrm{Spec}A$. Its map on global sections gives a ring homomorphismLocality of the stalk map implies, for every $a\in A$,Hence the point map must be $\mathfrak{q}\mapsto {\varphi }^{-1}\mathfrak{q}$. On $D(a)$, its structure sheaf map must send $b/1$ to $\varphi (b)/1$ and the inverse of $a$ to the inverse of $\varphi (a)$. Thus it is precisely the localization map constructed above. Agreement on this basis proves agreement of the morphisms of sheaves. In particular, the inducing ring homomorphism exists and is unique.

If $\varphi$ is surjective, write $B=A/I$. The correspondence between prime ideals of $A/I$ and prime ideals of $A$ containing $I$ identifies $\mathrm{Spec}B$ homeomorphically with the closed subset $V(I)$: the principal open subsets correspond on both sides. Moreover, the stalk maps are the surjections $A_{\mathfrak{p}}\to (A/I{)}_{\mathfrak{p}/I}$, so ${\mathcal{O}}_X\to f_{\ast }{\mathcal{O}}_Y$ is surjective.

For the converse, it is important not to assume that global sections preserve an arbitrary surjection of sheaves. Here the affine module-sheaf equivalence supplies the extra information: on every $D(a)$,Thus $f_{\ast }{\mathcal{O}}_Y$ is the quasi-coherent sheaf associated with the $A$-module $B$, and the cokernel sheaf of ${\mathcal{O}}_X\to f_{\ast }{\mathcal{O}}_Y$ is associated with the module $C=\mathrm{coker}(A\to B)$, since localization of a module is exact. Surjectivity of the morphism of sheaves gives $C_{\mathfrak{p}}=0$ for every prime ideal $\mathfrak{p}$. This implies $C=0$: if $0\ne c\in C$, its proper annihilator lies in a maximal ideal $\mathfrak{m}$, and then $c/1\ne 0$ in $C_{\mathfrak{m}}$. Therefore $A\to B$ is surjective. We have proved the closed immersion criterion for affine schemes:

Let $f:{\mathbb{P}}_k^1\to \mathrm{Spec}k$ be the structure map, a projective morphism. Let $D$ be the union of the two rational points $[0:1]$ and $[1:0]$. The homogeneous polynomial $t_0{t}_1$ defines this effective Cartier divisor and gives the exact sequence of coherent sheavesThe twisting sheaf on projective space $\mathcal{O}(-2)$ has no nonzero global sections: the chart calculation of Question 3(iv) now requires $a(t)=t^{-2}b(t^{-1})$, again impossible for nonzero polynomials. We also have $\Gamma ({\mathbb{P}}^1,\mathcal{O})=k$ and $\Gamma (D,{\mathcal{O}}_D)=k\oplus k$.

The direct image sheaf under $f$ is the module of global sections on the one-point scheme. Consequently the induced sequence isIts last nonzero map has cokernel isomorphic to $k$, since $(a,b)\mapsto b-a$ has the diagonal as its kernel. Thus the induced sequence is not exact at $f_{\ast }{\mathcal{O}}_D$, proving that projective direct image need not preserve surjections.

The intersection hypothesis says that $X$ is a semi-separated scheme. For an affine open subscheme $V\subseteq X$, the intersection $V\cap U$ is affine. Restricting the given short exact sequence of sheaves to it and applying the affine module-sheaf equivalence gives an exact sequence of global sections:These are exactly the sections on $V$ of the three direct image sheaves. Affine opens form a basis, and every section of the last sheaf on such a basis open lifts to the middle sheaf. This proves surjectivity as a sheaf morphism; left exactness of direct image supplies the other positions. Hence direct image preserves this short exact sequence. The crucial ingredient is exactness of sections of quasi-coherent sheaves on an affine intersection; arbitrary open immersions need not have this property.

For the cohomology comparison, every nonempty finite intersectionis affine. This follows by mathematical induction, intersecting the affine intersection already obtained with the next affine open. The restriction of $\mathcal{F}$ to it is quasi-coherent, so vanishing of quasi-coherent cohomology on an affine scheme givesWe now prove why this local vanishing gives the acyclic cover theorem, rather than identifying the two sorts of cohomology without a comparison.

Take a flasque resolution $0\to \mathcal{F}\to {\mathcal{I}}^0\to {\mathcal{I}}^1\to \cdots$. Here a flabby sheaf has surjective restriction maps; its restrictions to open subsets are still flabby and have zero higher sheaf cohomology. Form the double complexThe horizontal differential is the alternating restriction map $d_{\mathrm{C}}$; the vertical one $d_{\mathrm{I}}$ is induced by the resolution. They commute, so the total differential in bidegree $(p,q)$ is $d_{\mathrm{C}}+(-1{)}^p{d}_{\mathrm{I}}$ and has square zero. The Čech resolution on a semi-separated scheme uses precisely these intersections.

A flabby sheaf has zero positive Čech cohomology for a finite open cover, and its degree-zero Čech cohomology is its global sections. One way to establish this auxiliary fact is to use the exact augmented two-open complexExactness at the first two terms is the sheaf gluing axiom; the last map is onto because a section on the intersection extends to $V$. For the induction step, write $V$ for the union of all but the last open and $W$ for the last open. Separate Čech cochains according to whether their index list contains the last index. The resulting two-block complex compares the smaller cover of $V$ with its restricted cover of $V\cap W$, together with $\Gamma (W,\mathcal{I})$ in degree zero. By induction those two smaller cover complexes have cohomology only in degree zero, where they give $\Gamma (V,\mathcal{I})$ and $\Gamma (V\cap W,\mathcal{I})$. The displayed two-open exact sequence then gives zero positive-degree cohomology for the full cover. This proves the auxiliary fact by induction on the number of opens. Thus horizontal cohomology of $C^{\bullet ,q}$ consists only of $\Gamma (X,{\mathcal{I}}^q)$ in degree zero. Computing the cohomology of the total complex first horizontally therefore gives $H^n(X,\mathcal{F})$, by the resolution principle for sheaf cohomology.

On the other hand, vertical cohomology issince the restricted flasque resolutions compute cohomology on each intersection. The already established affine vanishing makes all rows with $q>0$ zero. The surviving row $q=0$ is exactly the Čech cochain complex ${\check{C}}^{\bullet }(\mathcal{U},\mathcal{F})$. Computing total cohomology first vertically therefore gives ${\check{H}}^n(\mathcal{U},\mathcal{F})$. These two computations are justified by the two filtrations of the first-quadrant double complex: in every total degree only finitely many terms occur, and the cover also bounds the horizontal degree. Their edge maps give the natural identificationFor negative degrees both groups are zero by convention. In particular, degree zero is the usual identification by the sheaf gluing axiom, not merely a comparison of dimensions.

For a presheaf $\mathcal{F}$, first form its stalks ${\mathcal{F}}_x={\underrightarrow{\lim }}_{x\in U}\mathcal{F}(U)$. Define ${\mathcal{F}}^{+}(U)$ to consist of families $(s_x{)}_{x\in U}$, with $s_x\in {\mathcal{F}}_x$, which are locally represented by sections of $\mathcal{F}$: every $x\in U$ has a neighbourhood $V\subseteq U$ and $t\in \mathcal{F}(V)$ with $s_y=t_y$ for all $y\in V$. Addition is pointwise and restriction discards the components outside the smaller open set. The local representability condition is itself local, so compatible such families on an open cover glue uniquely. Thus ${\mathcal{F}}^{+}$ is a sheaf of abelian groups. This is sheafification by locally representable germs.

The canonical presheaf morphism isThe universal property of sheafification says that, for any sheaf $\mathcal{H}$, composition with $\theta$ gives a natural bijectionIndeed, locally representing a family by $t$ defines its image locally by the image of $t$ in $\mathcal{H}$. Equal germs give locally equal images, and the sheaf gluing axiom gives the unique global image. If $\mathcal{F}$ is already a sheaf, a section with all germs zero is zero, while every locally represented family glues to an actual section. Hence ${\theta }_U$ is both injective and surjective for every $U$, so sheafification leaves a sheaf unchanged.

For a continuous map $f:X\to Y$, the direct image sheaf isAn open cover pulls back to an open cover, so its sheaf axioms follow directly from those of $\mathcal{F}$. To construct the inverse image sheaf, first setRestriction uses the inclusion of these neighbourhood systems when $V$ shrinks. The use of sheafification is important: $P$ need not itself be a sheaf. Continuity and the stalk construction give $(f^{-1}\mathcal{G}{)}_x\cong {\mathcal{G}}_{f(x)}$.

Given an f-morphism of sheaves $\varphi$, define its map on stalks byIf two representatives have the same germ at $f(x)$, they agree on a neighbourhood there. Restriction compatibility makes their images agree on its inverse image, a neighbourhood of $x$, proving well-definedness. The map is a group homomorphism. We index it by $x$, since different points over the same $f(x)$ have different target stalks.

For $s\in \mathcal{G}(U)$, its class in $P(f^{-1}U)$ and then in its sheafification defines the canonical f-morphism of sheaves $\theta (U)$. Its germ at $x$ is simply $s_{f(x)}$. To factor any $\varphi$, take a section $t\in (f^{-1}\mathcal{G})(V)$. Locally on an open cover $V=\bigcup V_a$, it comes from a section $s_a\in \mathcal{G}(U_a)$ with $V_a\subseteq f^{-1}{U}_a$. Define the prospective image on $V_a$ byOn an overlap, the representatives have the same inverse-image germs, so their images have the same germs by the maps ${\varphi }_x$. Two sheaf sections with equal germs everywhere are equal. The local images therefore glue uniquely, independently of every representative and cover choice. This construction is additive and commutes with restrictions, giving a sheaf morphism $\psi :f^{-1}\mathcal{G}\to \mathcal{F}$ withConversely any factorization must have the prescribed image on these locally generating sections, proving uniqueness. This is the universal property of an inverse image sheaf.

An f-morphism of sheaves is exactly a sheaf morphism $\mathcal{G}\to f_{\ast }\mathcal{F}$. Thus the two constructions give the inverse-image direct-image adjunctionNaturality follows from composing the local representatives and their images with morphisms in either sheaf variable. This is an adjunction for sheaves of abelian groups; it is not the tensor-adjusted pullback of modules on a ringed space.

The direct image sheaf is defined on an open set $V\subseteq Y$ byRestrictions are those of $\mathcal{F}$, and the sheaf gluing axiom follows by taking inverse images of an open cover. The morphism of ringed spaces supplies ${\varphi }^{\#}:{\mathcal{O}}_Y\to {\varphi }_{\ast }{\mathcal{O}}_X$. Thus $a\in {\mathcal{O}}_Y(V)$ acts on $s\in \mathcal{F}({\varphi }^{-1}V)$ by ${\varphi }^{\#}(a)s$, making ${\varphi }_{\ast }\mathcal{F}$ a sheaf of modules over ${\mathcal{O}}_Y$. This definition uses no quasi-coherence.

The printed assertion for every cohomological degree is false. The valid conclusion supplied by the stated Hartogs extension theorem is the degree-zero isomorphism. Indeed, around each removed point choose a small coordinate ball on which the holomorphic vector bundle $E$ is trivial. A holomorphic section on the punctured ball has finitely many holomorphic coefficient functions, each of which extends by Hartogs extension theorem when the complex dimension is at least two. Uniqueness of holomorphic extension makes these local extensions agree with the original section on overlaps, givingThis also identifies the direct image sheaf $j_{\ast }\mathcal{O}(E{|}_{X_0})$ with $\mathcal{O}(E)$ for the inclusion $j:X_0\hookrightarrow X$. It does not identify higher sheaf cohomology.

Here is an explicit higher-degree obstruction. Take $X={\mathbb{P}}^2$, remove $[0:0:1]$, and take the trivial line bundle. Cover $X_0$ by $U=\{x\ne 0\}$ and $V=\{y\ne 0\}$. On $U$ use coordinates $t=y/x$, $s=z/x$; on $V$ use $u=x/y=1/t$, $v=z/y=s/t$. Both charts are ${\mathbb{C}}^2$, and the overlap is ${\mathbb{C}}^{\ast }\times \mathbb{C}$. For every integer $m\ge 2$, the holomorphic functiondefines a Čech cocycle. It cannot be a Čech coboundary $b(1/t,s/t)-a(t,s)$ with $a,b$ entire on their charts. Taking the coefficient of $s^m$, the term from $a$ has only nonnegative powers of $t$, whereas the term from $b$ has the form $t^{-m}{b}_m(1/t)$ and only powers at most $-m$. Neither can provide the coefficient $t^{-1}$. Uniqueness of Laurent series proves the contradiction. The same argument applied to each fibre degree proves that all the classes $[g_m]$, $m\ge 2$, are linearly independent.

These classes remain nonzero in Čech cohomology of $X_0$, rather than merely of this cover. The low-degree Mayer-Vietoris sequence for sheaf cohomology injects the quotient of overlap sections by the two chart-section groups into $H^1(X_0,\mathcal{O})$. Concretely, a partition of unity gives smooth $f_U,f_V$ with $f_V-f_U=g$; their common Dolbeault operator defines a global $(0,1)$-form. If that form were $\bar{\partial }$-exact, subtracting its global smooth primitive would make $f_U,f_V$ holomorphic and split $g$. The nonsplitting just proved therefore gives the same obstruction in Dolbeault cohomology, and the Dolbeault theorem identifies it with sheaf cohomology. Thus $H^1(X_0,\mathcal{O})$ is infinite dimensional. In contrast, $H^1({\mathbb{P}}^2,\mathcal{O})$ is finite dimensional by compact Dolbeault Hodge decomposition for the Fubini-Study form. Hence the two degree-one groups cannot be isomorphic, disproving the printed all-degree request already in complex dimension two.

In complex dimension one, even the degree-zero conclusion fails. Take $X={\mathbb{P}}^1$, remove its point at infinity and use the trivial line bundle. Holomorphic functions on compact connected ${\mathbb{P}}^1$ are constant by the maximum modulus principle, whereas $X_0\cong \mathbb{C}$ has nonconstant entire functions such as $z$. Therefore the restriction map is not onto even in degree zero.

For the closed inclusion $f$, the direct image sheaf has stalk ${\mathcal{F}}_x$ at $x\in X$ and zero stalk at points outside $X$: outside the closed set there is an open neighbourhood disjoint from $X$. Hence $f_{\ast }$ is exact, since exact sequences of sheaves are detected on stalks.

Take a flasque resolution $\mathcal{F}\to {\mathcal{I}}^{\bullet }$. Direct image preserves flasqueness, because restrictions are the restrictions on inverse-image opens. Exactness makes $f_{\ast }{\mathcal{I}}^{\bullet }$ a flasque resolution of $f_{\ast }\mathcal{F}$. MoreoverThe complexes computing sheaf cohomology are identical. ThereforeThis is sheaf cohomology under a closed inclusion; the closedness hypothesis is used in the exactness of direct image.

Write $U_0=D_{+}(t_0)=\mathrm{Spec}\mathbb{C}[x]$, where $x=t_1/t_0$, and $U_1=D_{+}(t_1)=\mathrm{Spec}\mathbb{C}[y]$, with $y=1/x$ on the overlap. Since $\mathcal{G}$ is a quasi-coherent sheaf, it is associated to a $\mathbb{C}[x]$-module $M$ on $U_0$. The preimages under the open inclusion $f$ of $U_0,U_1,U_0\cap U_1$ are $U_0,D(x),D(x)$, all affine schemes. Thus $f$ is an affine morphism and its direct image sheaf $f_{\ast }\mathcal{G}$ is quasi-coherent by direct image of a quasi-coherent sheaf under an affine morphism.