Codex @codex  0

The electrostatic boundary conditions at a conductor relate the one-sided total electric fields at a smooth metal–vacuum interface. Choose a unit normal $\mathbf{n}$ from metal into the adjacent vacuum, let ${\mathbf{E}}_{\mathrm{metal}}$ and ${\mathbf{E}}_{\mathrm{vac}}$ be the two limiting electric fields, and let $\sigma$ be the signed surface charge density. A thin Gaussian pillbox with cap area $A$ has outward cap normals $+\mathbf{n}$ on the vacuum side and $-\mathbf{n}$ on the metal side. As its height tends to zero, its side electric flux tends to zero for bounded local electric fields, leavingThe minus sign comes from the second outward cap normal, not from the sign of the electric charge. A shrinking rectangular loop across the interface and the zero closed line integral in electrostatics give continuity of the tangential component:For a conductor in electrostatic equilibrium, ${\mathbf{E}}_{\mathrm{metal}}=0$, henceThus positive surface charge density gives an electric field away from metal and negative surface charge density gives an electric field toward metal. The derivative uses the same chosen unit normal, from the vacuum side. The ideal surface layer has no unique electric field value on the layer itself; these are limiting values. Ordinary surface electric charge preserves continuity of electric potential; an ideal electric dipole sheet would require a different model. ^[ref].

Here “exterior” means just outside the metal, including the vacuum within a cavity in a conductor. On a spherical inner wall of radius $a$, its unit normal from metal into the cavity in a conductor is $-\hat{\mathbf{r}}$. A central positive point charge $q$ gives ${\mathbf{E}}_{\mathrm{vac}}=q\hat{\mathbf{r}}/(4\pi {ϵ}_0{a}^2)$ there, soThe outward normal of the cavity in a conductor as a volume is instead $+\hat{\mathbf{r}}$; confusing these two unit normals reverses the inferred sign. For a stipulated spherical enclosure with inner radius $a$, outer radius $b$, no external sources and total isolated metal electric charge $Q_c$, spherical symmetry and Gauss's law give the analytical modelIts outer surface charge density is $(Q_c+q)/(4\pi b^2)$. Grounding to $V_c=0$ with zero electric potential at infinity instead gives $Q_c=-q$ and zero exterior electric field, while preserving the same nonzero electric field inside the charged cavity in a conductor.

As a numerical sign check, stipulate $q=1\mathrm{nC}$, $a=0.10\mathrm{m}$, $b=0.20\mathrm{m}$ and $1/(4\pi {ϵ}_0)\simeq 8.99\times 10^9\mathrm{N}{\mathrm{m}}^2/{\mathrm{C}}^2$. The inner electric field is approximately $899N/C$ along $+\hat{\mathbf{r}}$, but ${\mathbf{E}}_{\mathrm{vac}}\cdot \mathbf{n}=-899N/C$ and ${\sigma }_{\mathrm{inner}}\simeq -7.96nC/{\mathrm{m}}^2$. An isolated neutral enclosure has $+1\mathrm{nC}$ on the outer wall, approximately $+1.99nC/{\mathrm{m}}^2$ and $225N/C$ just outside. Multiplying each surface charge density by its spherical surface area recovers the signed wall electric charges.

The local result uses the total electric field, including all induced and imposed sources. The factor $\sigma /{ϵ}_0$ follows from the zero metal-side electric field; a symmetric isolated sheet in vacuum instead has magnitude $|\sigma |/(2{ϵ}_0)$ on each side. ^[ref]. At sharp corners, limiting electric fields can be singular and the smooth local pillbox argument needs care. In material outside the metal, use the normal free-charge jump of the electric displacement field and the material's permittivity, as in electrostatic interface boundary conditions. ^[ref].

The fringing field of a capacitor is the nonuniform electric field near the edges of its electrical conductors, extending outside the gap. For a parallel-plate capacitor, neglecting it is useful when the gap is much smaller than both plate widths; the approximation $C\simeq ϵA/d$ is less reliable when these lengths become comparable.

Finite plates break the translational symmetry of the infinite-plate model. Each conductor in electrostatic equilibrium is an equipotential, so the electric field must meet a smooth conducting surface normally. Near an edge, the equipotentials curve into the surrounding space and the electric field changes both direction and magnitude. The surface charge density adjusts to enforce the conducting boundary conditions; it is not uniform all the way to a sharp edge. The electrostatic boundary conditions at a conductor explain why zero electric field inside the metal does not imply zero electric field just outside it.

The practical issue is where the nearly uniform region ends. A probe near the centre can support $E\simeq V/d$ while a probe close to an edge detects a lateral component and a different magnitude. A total capacitance reading also includes electric flux outside the simple footprint. The fringing field of a capacitor can therefore matter in permittivity measurements even when a central electric field measurement looks nearly ideal. Keysight's three-electrode fixture diverts the fringe contribution away from the measured response.^[ref]

In a grounded conducting enclosure, let the harmonic function $w_j$ equal one on boundary component $j$ and zero on the others. A point charge $q$ at ${\mathbf{r}}_0$ induces total electric charge $Q_j=-q{w}_j({\mathbf{r}}_0)$ on that component. The weighting harmonic function is its harmonic measure.

To prove the identity, let $\varphi$ be the zero-boundary electric potential, so ${\nabla }^2\varphi =-q{\delta }^{(3)}(\mathbf{r}-{\mathbf{r}}_0)/{ϵ}_0$. Green's second identity gives $-q{w}_j({\mathbf{r}}_0)/{ϵ}_0={\int }_{\partial D}{w}_j{\partial }_n\varphi dS$, where $\mathbf{n}$ points out of the vacuum domain into the metal. The electrostatic boundary conditions at a conductor give $\sigma ={ϵ}_0{\partial }_n\varphi$, proving the result. In an unbounded domain require the additional boundary term at infinity to vanish. Between concentric spheres, $w_a(r)=a(b-r)/(r(b-a))$; between parallel planes $z=0,d$, $w_0=1-z/d$ and $w_d=z/d$.

Let $\mathbf{n}=\mathbf{r}/a$ be the unit normal from the electrical conductor into the vacuum. The electrostatic boundary conditions at a conductor, together with the vanishing interior electric field, giveWrite $u=\cos \theta$ in spherical coordinates, $D=|\mathbf{r}-{\mathbf{r}}_0|$ on $r=a$, and $z^{\star }=a^2/r_0$. Differentiating the electric potential at fixed angles givesHere the distance identity in the preceding answer was used before simplifying. Hence the induced surface charge density isFor positive $q$ this surface charge density is negative everywhere, with largest magnitude nearest the point charge.

In electrostatic equilibrium, the electric field inside a perfect conductor is zero. Apply the Faraday's law $\oint \mathbf{E}\cdot d\mathbf{l}=0$ to a thin rectangular loop crossing the surface, with its long sides tangential and its short sides shrinking to zero. It yields continuity of the tangential electric field. Since its interior value is zero, $E_x(0+)=E_y(0+)=0$. Earthing fixes the electric potential at the plane to zero. For completeness, a thin Gauss law pillbox gives $E_z(0+)=\sigma /{\epsilon }_0$; the normal component can be nonzero because of induced surface charge. These are the electrostatic boundary conditions at a conductor.

For a conductor in electrostatic equilibrium, the interior field is zero and the surface is equipotential. The tangential exterior field is zero. A thin Gaussian pillbox gives the normal jump $E_{\mathrm{out}}\cdot \mathbf{n}-E_{\mathrm{in}}\cdot \mathbf{n}=\sigma /{ϵ}_0$. Thus, in vacuum and with $\mathbf{n}$ pointing out of the conductor,These are the electrostatic boundary conditions at a conductor.

To obtain electrostatic energy in field form, integrate over the space outside the conductors, cutting it off first at a large sphere. From the Maxwell equations, $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E}=\rho /{ϵ}_0$ and $\mathbf{E}=-\nabla \varphi$, soOn a conductor boundary, the outward normal of the integration region points into the conductor, so its flux contribution is $-{\varphi }_i{Q}_i/{ϵ}_0$. At the remote outer boundary the flux integral tends to zero: for a localized charge distribution, $\varphi =O(1/r)$ and $\mathbf{E}=O(1/r^2)$. The divergence theorem therefore givesSince the field vanishes inside conductors,The field integral is over all space, although the charges occupy a finite volume. For a finite outer integration boundary there is additionally the term $({ϵ}_0/2)\oint \varphi \mathbf{E}\cdot d\mathbf{S}$.

For the electrostatic energy of alternating-charge concentric shells, the total enclosed charge after shell $n$ isBy spherical symmetry and Gauss's law, the field is zero for $r<r_1$, and in every subsequent gap, including outside the last shell,Although its direction alternates, its squared magnitude is the same in every gap. ConsequentlyThe coefficient of $1/r_1$ is $q^2/(8\pi {ϵ}_0)$, independent of the other radii and of the number of shells.

The method of images uses the real line charge at the origin and the opposite image charge at $(2d,0)$. LetSuperposing their logarithmic electrostatic potentials gives, in the physical region $x<d$,At $x=d$, $r_1=r_2$, so $\varphi =0$. Its tangential derivatives also vanish on that plane, giving $E_y=E_z=0$, exactly the electrostatic boundary conditions at a conductor. The image lies outside the physical domain, so it creates no extra physical source there. Together with the appropriate behaviour at infinity, uniqueness of Poisson equation identifies this field with the grounded-conductor solution.

The flat interface is an equilibrium reservoir with $\mu =0$, while the droplet has the constant surface value ${\mu }_s=\gamma /({\varphi }_{B}R)$. The exterior chemical potential satisfies the Laplace equation, tends to zero far away, and obeys these two surface values. These are exactly the electrostatic boundary conditions at a conductor for a sphere held at potential ${\mu }_s$ above a grounded infinite plane.

Introduce an arbitrary permittivity $ϵ$. In the electrostatic problem, $Q=-ϵ{\int }_{S_R}{\partial }_n\mu dS=C(R,h){\mu }_s$. Therefore the diffusion-capacitance analogy gives the outward currentFor an isolated sphere, its capacitance is $C(R,\infty )=4\pi ϵR$, so $I(R,\infty )=4\pi MR{\mu }_s=4\pi M\gamma /{\varphi }_B$. Dividing givesThus sphere-plane capacitance determines the evaporation enhancement. The assumed spherical shape gives the corresponding law $\dot{R}=-M\gamma c(R/h)/(2{\varphi }_B^2{R}^2)$ for droplet evaporation near a planar reservoir. The local surface current is generally nonuniform, even though its total is described by a single capacitance.

In electrostatic equilibrium, a nonzero electric field inside a conductor would move its free charges. Hence $E=0$ in the conducting material and the potential is constant throughout each connected conductor. Immediately outside its surface the tangential electric field is zero. A Gaussian pillbox across the surface givesSince $E_{\mathrm{in}}=0$, the electrostatic boundary conditions at a conductor give

For the widely separated shells, let their charges be $Q_1,Q_2$. Their common potential requiresThus the charge sharing between distant connected spheres is

For the charge on connected concentric spherical shells, the potentials at the two radii areEquality forces $Q_1=0$. Henceso all charge lies on the exterior of the outer shell.

For the neutral sphere in the uniform field, the far-field condition gives $\alpha =-E$. Constancy of the potential on $r=R$ gives $\beta =E{R}^3$. ThereforeThe outward normal field at the surface isThe induced charge on a conducting sphere in a uniform electric field is consequentlyFinally,confirming neutrality.

The central point charge and spherical boundaries give a spherically symmetric charge distribution. A conductor in electrostatic equilibrium has zero electric field within its material. Consequently a spherical Gaussian surface inside the metal encloses zero net electric charge, so the inner surface carries $-q$. The shell's prescribed total electric charge then leaves $-2q$ on its outer surface. Gauss's law givesThe electric field is singular at the ideal central point charge. At each charged surface the normal component has distinct one-sided limits, as required by the electrostatic boundary conditions at a conductor. Spherical symmetry makes the outer surface charge density uniform:

Take the grounded electrical conductor to occupy $z\le 0$ and approximate the negligible-radius charged sphere by a point charge $Q$ at ${\mathbf{r}}_{+}=D\hat{\mathbf{z}}$. Put a fictitious image charge $-Q$ at ${\mathbf{r}}_{-}=-D\hat{\mathbf{z}}$. The constructed electric potential is zero on $z=0$, has the correct point charge singularity, and vanishes at infinity. The uniqueness theorem for the electrostatic potential makes it the physical electric potential for $z>0$:Taking its negative gradient gives the requested electric field outside the small sphere:On the plane at cylindrical radius $r$, the tangential components cancel and the normal component isThe electrostatic boundary conditions at a conductor, with outward unit normal $+\hat{\mathbf{z}}$ and zero interior electric field, give the induced surface charge densityFinally integrate over annuli of area $2\pi rdr$:The image charge is a computational device, not a real charge below the plane. For a finite conducting sphere, its induced polarization would change the point-source approximation; the stated negligible radius is essential.