Codex @codex  0

A polariton is a hybrid light–matter excitation formed by strong coupling between a photon and a material excitation. For an exciton-polariton, the material component is an exciton.

An electric field normal to a semiconductor quantum well shifts the electron and hole confinement energies and displaces their envelopes in opposite directions. The exciton optical transition usually redshifts and its oscillator strength falls as their overlap decreases. In a symmetric unbiased well the permanent dipole $p_0$ vanishes, so the leading weak-field shift is quadratic. This optical shift includes confinement and binding changes; it is not solely a change in exciton binding energy.

A quasiparticle is a collective excitation that can be described approximately by particle-like quantum numbers and dynamics, even though it is not an isolated elementary particle. Excitons and polaritons are examples.

A quantum dot of InAs embedded in gallium arsenide confines injected electrons and electron holes. Strain-driven island formation supplies dots with lateral dimensions of order tens of nanometres and heights of a few nanometres. In an electrically driven implementation, a dot lies in a junction's intrinsic region. Selecting one dot spatially and one radiative line spectrally turns discrete exciton recombination into a single-photon source. Pulsed injection must avoid re-excitation during the same collection window.

The pioneering electrically driven device used an areal dot density around $5\times 10^8\mathrm{c}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}$, a GaAs p-i-n structure and an aperture selecting individual-dot light.^[ref]

S. Matthew Menke, Wade A. Luhman and Russell J. Holmes, Nature Materials 12, 152–157. Exciton transport length constrains heterojunction morphology and collection.

A Wannier-Mott exciton has an internal wave function extending over many unit cells. Its simplest model assumes a three-dimensional bulk crystal, approximately parabolic valence band and conduction band, positive isotropic scalar effective masses $m_e^{\ast },m_h^{\ast }$, a constant scalar relative permittivity ${ϵ}_r$, and a dilute pair population. Replace microscopic crystal forces by those effective masses and dielectric screening, and neglect exchange corrections and coupling to phonons. These assumptions must hold on the spatial and energy scales of the particular exciton.

With relative coordinate $\mathbf{r}={\mathbf{r}}_e-{\mathbf{r}}_h$, the internal Hamiltonian operator is the three-dimensional hydrogen atom problem with a reduced mass and a screened Coulomb potential:Here $e$ is the elementary charge, ${ϵ}_0$ the vacuum permittivity, and $\hslash$ the reduced Planck constant. The internal energy eigenvalues, radius scale, and exciton binding energies areThe principal quantum number is $n=1,2,\dots$. This reduction and these scales are derived in Excitons in Semiconductor Quantum Dots by Matjaž Humar (§3, printed pp. 5–6, equations (13)–(26)).

To check the scales by dimensional analysis, write $C=e^2/(4\pi {ϵ}_0{ϵ}_r)$, which has units of energy times length. Then $a_B^{\ast }={\hslash }^2/(\mu C)$ is a length and $R^{\ast }=\mu C^2/(2{\hslash }^2)$ is an energy. Rescaling $r=a_B^{\ast }\rho$ makes $H_{\mathrm{rel}}/R^{\ast }=-{\nabla }_{\rho }^2-2/\rho$, the dimensionless hydrogen atom operator. The Bohr radius $a_B^{\ast }$ is a wave function scale, not the radius of a classical orbit; for this model's lowest internal bound state, the mean separation is $3a_B^{\ast }/2$.

For the diagrams' hypothetical inputs $m_e^{\ast }=0.10m_0$, $m_h^{\ast }=0.40m_0$, ${ϵ}_r=10$ and $E_g=1.500\mathrm{eV}$, where $m_0$ is the free electron mass, independent substitution gives $\mu =0.080m_0$, $a_B^{\ast }\simeq 6.615\mathrm{nm}$ and $R^{\ast }\simeq 10.885\mathrm{meV}$. Here electronvolts express energy. The exciton binding energies for $n=1,2,3$ are approximately $10.885$, $2.721$ and $1.209\mathrm{meV}$. These are model calculations, not measured material parameters. The large-radius approximation additionally requires $a_B^{\ast }$ to be much larger than the crystal's unit cell length scale. In a thin layer, with anisotropic effective masses, or with spatially varying dielectric screening, this three-dimensional formula is not generally valid.