Isomorphism theorems Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-13
The isomorphism theorems relate homomorphisms, their kernels and images, and quotient constructions in algebra. For groups, the first isomorphism theorem identifies a homomorphism's image with the quotient group by its group kernel. Analogous statements include the first isomorphism theorem for rings and the First isomorphism theorem for vector spaces: identifying precisely the inputs with the same output preserves the remaining algebraic structure.
By the first isomorphism theorem for rings, the given surjection identifies with . Since is a principal ideal domain, write .
If , the quotient ring is , an integral domain, so part (a)(ii) applies. If is a unit, the quotient ring is the zero ring; its unique element is associate to itself by multiplication by its identity, so it too is an associator ring.
In the remaining case, unique factorization giveswhere is a unit, the are pairwise nonassociate prime elements, and . The principal ideals are pairwise comaximal: different prime factors have greatest common divisor , and Bézout's identity gives a linear combination equal to . The Chinese remainder theorem therefore gives a ring isomorphismEvery factor is an associator ring by part (c), and their finite direct product of rings is an associator ring by part (b). A ring isomorphism preserves units and principal ideals, so the property transfers to . Hence
Take . The ring homomorphismis surjective. Its kernel of a ring homomorphism is exactly : a polynomial maps to zero precisely when its constant coefficient is even, in which case it has the form with and . By the first isomorphism theorem for rings,This quotient ring is a field, so is a maximal ideal and in particular a prime ideal.
Suppose were a principal ideal. Because , the nonzero polynomial divides the constant , forcing its polynomial degree to be zero: for a nonzero integer . But also makes divide the coefficient of , so . This would give , contradicting the properness of the kernel of a ring homomorphism . ThereforeThere is no conflict with part (c): . The zero-intersection hypothesis is exactly what excludes this example.
An ideal is an additive subgroup of a ring closed under multiplication by arbitrary ring elements; in a potentially noncommutative ring, a two-sided ideal must absorb multiplication on both sides. For a ring homomorphism , its kernel of a ring homomorphism contains zero, is closed under subtraction, and satisfies and . Thus is an ideal.
Define by . It is well-defined because two representatives differ by an element of , preserves addition and multiplication, is surjective by hypothesis, and is injective because its zero class is precisely . Therefore , the first isomorphism theorem for rings.
Apply this to the evaluation homomorphism , . Constants prove surjectivity, and division by shows that its kernel of a ring homomorphism is . Hence .
The evaluation homomorphism , , is surjective and has kernel of a ring homomorphism . Hence is an ideal, and the first isomorphism theorem for rings gives . Since this quotient is a field, .
The Chinese remainder theorem for two comaximal two-sided ideals of a ring states that the natural ring homomorphism inducesIndeed, the map has kernel of a ring homomorphism . Choose , with . Given target representatives , the element is congruent to modulo and to modulo , proving surjectivity. The first isomorphism theorem for rings gives the result. For a commutative ring, : if , then , while the reverse inclusion follows from the ideal properties.
Set to define a surjective ring homomorphismIts kernel of a ring homomorphism is exactly : the constant coefficient in must vanish, so every remaining monomial is divisible by . The first isomorphism theorem for rings therefore givesThe polynomial ring is an integral domain, because the product of two nonzero polynomials has nonzero leading coefficient. It is not a field: has no polynomial multiplicative inverse, since a nonzero product has positive degree of a polynomial. Consequently is prime and is not maximal. Concretely, is a strict chain of ideals.
The first isomorphism theorem for rings states that the mapis a ring isomorphism. It is well defined because two representatives differ by an element of the kernel exactly when their images agree. It preserves addition and multiplication, is onto its stated codomain, and has trivial kernel. In particular, if is surjective then .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 ib Paper 2 2G Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
A complex number is an algebraic number over when it is a root of a nonzero rational polynomial. Its minimal polynomial of an algebraic element is the unique monic polynomial in of smallest degree annihilating it; polynomial division shows that it divides every rational polynomial annihilating the element, and it is irreducible.
Consider the surjective evaluation ring homomorphism . Certainly . Because the nonconstant is irreducible over , its content is a unit: otherwise its content and its nonconstant primitive part give a factorization into nonunits. By the Gauss lemma for polynomials, is irreducible in and is a scalar multiple of the minimal polynomial.
If vanishes at , then divides in . Primitive divisibility in Gauss lemma for polynomials implies division in as well. Explicitly, write the rational quotient as with primitive integral and ; the primitive product shows that integrality of forces . Thus the kernel is precisely , and the first isomorphism theorem for rings yieldsNo monicity of is needed; this is an isomorphism of rings, not an assertion that either ring is a field.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 101 4 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Yes. Taking the constant coefficient defines a surjective ring homomorphismIts kernel of a ring homomorphism is , so the first isomorphism theorem for rings gives .
We prove the needed preservation result. If is a Noetherian ring and is an ideal, any ascending chain of ideals in lifts under the quotient ring homomorphism to an ascending chain of ideals in . The lifted chain stabilizes; surjectivity makes the original chain stabilize as well. Hence every quotient ring of a Noetherian ring is Noetherian.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2021 ib Paper 3 10G v Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
By the prime ideal quotient criterion,For a principal ideal, this is precisely the assertion that is a prime element. This closes the cycle and proves that (i)--(v) are equivalent.
Now let be a surjective ring homomorphism, where is a principal ideal domain and is an integral domain. WriteIf , the first isomorphism theorem for rings makes an isomorphism. Otherwiseis an integral domain, so the equivalences just proved show that is maximal and is a field.
Next suppose that the polynomial ring is a principal ideal domain. It follows first that is an integral domain. For nonzero , the idealis principal. Since divides the nonzero constant , it is constant; since it also divides , that constant divides the coefficient , so is a unit. Therefore , and there are polynomials such thatSetting gives , so every nonzero is a unit. Hence
Finally, let be an integral domain in which every two nonzero elements have a greatest common divisor. If an irreducible divides , then is either a unit or an associate of . In the second case . In the first case, the Euclid lemma in a greatest-common-divisor domain gives . Thus every irreducible element of is prime.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 ib Paper 3 1E Solution Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-25
The first isomorphism theorem for rings states that a ring homomorphism induces an isomorphismBecause is an ideal, sums and products of elements of remain in , so it is a subring. The surjective homomorphismhas kernel . The theorem givesEvaluation at givesso this quotient is a field of characteristic zero. The other quotient isIt has characteristic but is not a field, since the nonzero class of is nilpotent.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 ib Paper 4 9E Solution Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-10-03
Letbe a primitive polynomial. The Eisenstein criterion states that if a prime number satisfiesthen is an irreducible polynomial in , equivalently in by Gauss lemma for polynomials.
To prove it, suppose that with of positive degree. Primitivity and Gauss's lemma let us take such an integral factorisation if a factorisation over exists. Reducing modulo givesBecause does not divide the leading coefficient of , neither factor loses degree on reduction. The polynomial ring is a unique factorization domain, so both reductions are monomials of positive degree. In particular, divides both constant terms and . It follows that dividesa contradiction. This proves the criterion.
For a prime , translate the geometric sum by one:Its leading coefficient is one, every other coefficient is divisible by , and its constant coefficient is , which is not divisible by . It is therefore Eisenstein at . Translation is an automorphism of , soThis is the geometric-sum irreducibility criterion.
The evaluation homomorphismhas image and contains in its kernel. Since is monic, division by in writes every as with . If , then ; the irreducibility of says that is the minimal polynomial of , so . Thus , and the first isomorphism theorem for rings gives
Now take . Then , and the Eisenstein integers areComplex conjugation sends to , so the field norm isGiven , choose integers with . For ,For with , apply this to and put . ThenHence the norm is a Euclidean function, proving that is a Euclidean domain. This is the Euclidean norm on the Eisenstein integers.
Finally suppose satisfies . Make the free abelian group into a -module by definingThis is well-defined precisely because obeys the same polynomial relation as . The module is finitely generated. It is also torsion-free module: if and , multiplication by the conjugate of gives , and the additive group has no nonzero integer torsion.
A Euclidean domain is a principal ideal domain, and the structure theorem for finitely generated modules over a principal ideal domain says that a finitely generated torsion-free module over one is free. Thusfor some . Since has free module basis over , comparison of abelian ranks gives . There can consequently be no such matrix when is odd.
If , choose a -basis . Thenis a -basis, and . In this basis the matrix of is a direct sum of copies ofEvery admissible matrix is therefore conjugate in to . Hence there is exactly one conjugacy class for even , and none for odd . This is the classification of integral matrices satisfying the third cyclotomic polynomial.
Past exam of the rings and modules course of the University of Oxford 2023 1 c ii Solution 2026-10-25
Using the assumed square-free polynomial property, factorinto distinct monic polynomials that are irreducible polynomials, with . Part (b)(iii) identifies with , where .
By the first isomorphism theorem for rings, the image from part (c)(i) is , where is the kernel of a ring homomorphism. By part (a)(ii), for ideals . A field has only the zero ideal and the whole field as ideals, so each is either or the zero ring. Consequently, for a subset ,This is the quotient of a finite product of fields principle. The subset is nonempty because , whereas the zero ring has only one unit. By part (a)(i),Each factor is a positive integer. Since is a prime number, exactly one factor is and all remaining factors are one. Thusso is a Mersenne prime. If with , then would be a proper divisor of ; thus is itself a prime number, although only the displayed form is needed.
The assumed square-free polynomial property can also be checked directly: in characteristic of a ring two, the formal derivative of is because is odd. These two polynomials have greatest common divisor one, since does not divide , so no repeated irreducible polynomial factor occurs.
Quotient of a finite product of fields 2026-10-25
A quotient ring of a finite direct product of rings whose factors are fields is a product of a subset of those factors. By ideals of a finite product of rings, write . Since a field has only the zero ideal and the whole field as ideals, every is one of these. The ring homomorphism is surjective with kernel of a ring homomorphism , so the first isomorphism theorem for rings gives . Discard the zero ring factors. If no factors survive, the result is the zero ring.