Take to mean the magnitude of the inward radial velocity. In the Gaussian units used for the magnetic pressure, approximate the surface density of a disk by . The mass accretion rate and free-fall speed then give
At the magnetospheric truncation radius, balance the magnetic pressure of the magnetic dipole field with the specified ram pressure:
Thus
Discarding the convention-dependent numerical factor gives
The magnetic pressure grows inward as , faster than the ram pressure , so the field disrupts the flow inside this radius. The numerical coefficient depends on the vertical averaging and on treating the inflow as radial free fall, as stipulated here; a detailed thin disk boundary model need not have the same coefficient.
Use for inward mass accretion rate, and for magnetic torque adding angular momentum to the disk. Combining the continuity equation with conservation of angular momentum identifies the inward mass flux as . In a steady Keplerian accretion disk, this is the supplied constant , so
The boundary condition is . Since , the viscous torque in an accretion disk is . Hence the steady Keplerian accretion disk with an inner torque has
In particular, . For a physical steady solution with this boundary condition, .
For , the surface density of a disk rises from a small inner value toward : this is the usual Keplerian accretion disk with an approximately zero-torque inner boundary condition. For , the inner surface density of a disk is large and decreases approximately as , giving a torque-dominated accretion disk. This approximation applies where ; sufficiently far out, any fixed finite again approaches the same constant asymptote.
Figure 1.
Steady surface-density profiles with weak and strong inner torques
. Details.
The constant net inward angular-momentum flux is
For , net angular momentum moves outward. The strong-torque profile is therefore decretion disk-like in its stress-dominated structure, but the specified mass flux remains inward: a genuine net decretion disk requires an outward mass flux, not merely large .
At , the Maxwell stress tensor estimate gives
Using the magnetospheric truncation radius scaling in part (b), all dimensional parameters cancel:
If the displayed is retained and the scaling radius is assigned unit coefficient, the estimate is ; retaining and exact free-fall speed throughout gives . Those prefactors are not controlled by the scaling argument. In particular, it does not generate a parametrically large .
Well inside the Bondi accretion radius, pressure is negligible and the inflow approaches the free-fall speed
Steady spherical mass conservation gives
Estimating the outward optical depth across a radial scale with electron-scattering opacity ,
The integral optical depth to infinity differs only by a factor of two in this free-fall approximation.
At the Schwarzschild radius, when
If the conventional Eddington accretion rate is , then . This comparison depends on the reference efficiency , while itself follows directly from optical depth.
Writing gives
For , the inner flow is optically thick and its photosphere lies at
The diffusion speed is . Hence
and equality defines the photon-trapping radius
Inside , inward advection outruns outward diffusion, so photon trapping in an accretion flow carries most released radiation into the black hole.
Only the binding energy released outside escapes efficiently. Its order of magnitude is
The radiative efficiency of black-hole accretion therefore decreases inversely with supply rate:
Order-one coefficients depend on the optical-depth and inner-boundary conventions, but the luminosity saturation and are robust.
Put . On the inner supersonic branch, the equation from part (d) is
Its asymptotic expansion as begins
Taking the positive square root gives
Since and ,
The leading term is the free-fall speed ; the logarithmic term is the first pressure correction to the inner Isothermal Bondi accretion flow.
Let a test particle start at rest at radius outside a fixed spherically symmetric source. The spherical shell theorem gives the exterior Newtonian gravitational potential , where is the source's standard gravitational parameter. Zero initial transverse velocity makes the motion radial. Conservation of mechanical energy per unit mass gives
The minus sign selects inward motion; the positive square root is its speed. For a fall from to the surface , that speed is . In the limit of release from rest infinitely far away, the familiar free-fall speed is , equal in magnitude to the local escape velocity. A finite starting radius gives a smaller speed.
The arrival time follows from the same first integral. Set . Then
For arrival at this is finite, and the field formula is used only outside the source. For , gives
Keeping the smaller initial gravitational magnitude constant would predict , about longer. The actual acceleration increases during the fall.
Figure 1.
Radial free-fall height and arrival time compared with constant gravity at the release point
. Details.
The curves compare a shallow fall, , with a fall from , so . Each comparison holds the release height and initial gravitational magnitude fixed. The constant-gravity model is close for the shallow fall and increasingly inaccurate for the larger one. This is also a practical use of nondimensionalization: the normalized trajectories depend on , while supplies the dimensional time scale.