Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 71 2 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
We place the definitions and the unheaded preliminary requests here before addressing the first labelled property. The Schwartz space consists of smooth functions with finite seminormsfor every pair of multi-indices. Convergence means convergence in each seminorm. The tempered distribution space is its continuous dual space, with weak convergence tested against every Schwartz function. A continuous functional satisfies a bound by finitely many of these seminorms, equivalently by one sufficiently large weighted derivative seminorm.
Use the Fourier transform conventionDifferentiation under the integral and integration by parts express as a constant of modulus one times the Fourier transform of . Its supremum is bounded by the norm of that function. For , this norm is at most a constant times finitely many Schwartz seminorms, using the integrable weight . Thus is continuous.
For completeness, Fourier inversion follows by inserting in the inverse integral and using Fubini's theorem. The result is convolution with the Gaussian approximate identityIt tends to , while integrability of allows the damping factor to be removed by dominated convergence theorem. Consequently . Reflection preserves every Schwartz seminorm, so the inverse transform is continuous as well. This proves the Fourier transform isomorphism of the Schwartz space.
Define the Fourier transform of a tempered distribution by transposition,The Schwartz-space continuity just proved makes this a tempered distribution. Its inverse is , where . These maps are continuous for weak convergence, since each pairing is a pairing with a fixed transformed test. They are also continuous for the strong dual topology, because the Schwartz-space maps take bounded sets to bounded sets.
The convolution of a tempered distribution with a Schwartz function isSmooth dependence of translated Schwartz functions gives . The finite-seminorm estimate and show that each derivative has at most polynomial growth. In particular, is a smooth function defining a tempered distribution. It need not itself be a Schwartz function; for example .
Writing , its distributional pairing is . The inner convolution is a Schwartz function, and this identity follows by integration in the Schwartz topology, justified by the weighted seminorm estimates. A direct Fubini's theorem calculation gives . HenceMultiplication is well defined because multiplication by acts continuously on .
Now write the Hilbert transform as convolution with , the principal-value reciprocal distribution. The given Heaviside function transform, together with , yieldsThe value of the sign function at zero is irrelevant to its regular distribution. Thus the Hilbert-transform Fourier multiplier isApplying Plancherel theorem, whose normalization here is , proves the isometry:The principal-value integral agrees with this convolution: near its singular point subtract , and use odd cancellation; at infinity the Schwartz decay gives convergence. The Hilbert transform has domain , but generally does not take values in , as the tail in part (c) demonstrates.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 ii Paper 4 22F iv Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-05
The implication is true in every dimension despite the failure of part (iii). The hypothesis gives , since its weight is at least one. Let be its inverse Fourier-Plancherel transform; then by construction.
Use the Gaussian approximate identity . Its Fourier transform is . Fourier inversion of this integrable multiplier times the bounded transform of , justified by Fubini, gives the same function both as and as . The first converges to in , while the second converges to in by Plancherel and dominated convergence. Along a common sequence, select subsequences converging almost everywhere for both norms. Their limits agree, giving almost everywhere. ConsequentlyThis proves the requested conclusion without relying on the incorrect general-dimensional kernel assertion.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ia Paper 1 7A Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
For the heat kerneldirect partial differentiation givesThus solves the heat equation. For bounded continuous , differentiation under the integral sign givesWith ,The Gaussian integral makes the weight have total mass one, and the dominated convergence theorem gives . This is the Gaussian approximate identity.
For the viscous Burgers equation with unit viscosity, the Cole-Hopf transformation reduces the equation to . To obtain initial value , choose(up to an irrelevant positive constant), and set . ThereforeEquivalently,and the approximate-identity limit gives .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 ii Paper 4 26G Solution Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-25
Because the centered normal distribution density is nonnegative and has integral one, Fubini's theorem and translation invariance giveThus .
Use the angular-frequency conventionThe convolution theorem and the Gaussian transform giveSince , this product is integrable. Moreover, absolute integrability justifies exchanging the integrals:This proves the Fourier inversion theorem for the convolution directly.
Now additionally suppose . For every , the dominated convergence theorem givesFourier inversion identifies the right-hand side with for Lebesgue almost everywhere . Therefore the Gaussian approximate identity satisfies
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2024 iii Paper 202 6 b Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
Let be the heat kernel for . The symmetry of the Gaussian distribution gives the method-of-images formulaThis is the Neumann heat kernel on a half-line. Differentiation under the integral sign shows that for and that . At , the two differentiated kernel terms cancel, so . The Gaussian approximate identity gives as , while the dominated convergence theorem gives continuity up to . Finally , which is stronger than the required exponential bound. Thus satisfies every condition in the displayed boundary-value problem.