Franck-Hertz experiment Created 2026-10-14 Updated 2026-10-18
The Franck-Hertz experiment connects a reproducible loss of Electron kinetic energy with excitation of a chemical atom. The original mercury-vapor experiments were performed during 1912–1914 while investigating ionization; they were not designed as a test of the Bohr model. Their later interpretation distinguished internal excitation from removal of an Electron. [ref]
https://labs.physik.kit.edu/prakt-klass-physik-manuals/P2/Franck_Hertz_Versuch/. KIT physics laboratory, H23 Franck-Hertz-Versuch, Motivation
.In a modern mercury tube, a heated cathode emits Electrons and a positive perforated grid accelerates them through Hg vapor. A collector slightly below the grid's electric potential rejects slow Electrons. The oven controls vapor density and hence the mean free path. Keep heating and retarding settings fixed, sweep the accelerating electric potential difference , and record collector electric current . These measured quantities indirectly probe atomic excitation. [ref]
https://physlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Franck_exp_v12015.pdf. Shah, Alam and Anwar, Electron energy loss investigated through the Franck-Hertz Experiment, sections 3–4
.The curve shows repeated current minima, typically about apart. In the collision model, an Electron gains approximately of kinetic energy, with the positive elementary charge. An inelastic collision transfers about to internal excitation. Near the grid, this can prevent the Electron crossing the retarding region, lowering collected electric current. Further acceleration restores collection; repeated excitation losses produce further minima. These represent multiple collisions, rather than equally spaced atomic energy eigenvalues. Contact potentials shift the first minimum, so compare several successive spacings instead of identifying the first dip's voltage with the excitation cost. [ref]
https://physlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Franck_exp_v12015.pdf. Shah, Alam and Anwar, sections 3.1–4 and Figure 3
.The optical comparison supplies a second observable: mercury radiation at a wavelength near was detected through a window in the tube. Its inferred photon energy agrees with the characteristic collision loss, with the speed of light. This agreement supports the interpretation as a transition between internal atomic energies. It does not make the collector trace a complete spectrum. In particular, the lowest excited mercury level, labeled , is metastable because an electric-dipole selection rule forbids its direct transition to the ground state; the nearby level emits the quoted ultraviolet line. Collision excitation and optical detection therefore have different sensitivities to the available excited states. [ref]
https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/8-13-14-experimental-physics-i-ii-junior-lab-fall-2016-spring-2017/afdfff9f8bbe067239af19c8b178a764_MIT8_13-14F16-S17exp7.pdf. MIT Junior Lab, The Franck-Hertz Experiment, section VI and the discussion following Figure 6
.Initial Electron kinetic energy spread and varying collision positions broaden real minima. Repeat traces at different retarding settings and oven temperatures to distinguish excitation from collection effects. This probes a discrete energy-transfer channel, rather than every energy eigenspace, its dimension, or an absolute ground-state energy. [ref].
James Franck and Gustav Ludwig Hertz presented their paper on 24 April 1914. Its heated platinum wire sat inside a cylindrical platinum mesh, with a collector 1–2 mm beyond it. A heated bath and pumping prepared the vapor; guard rings suppressed leakage. They differentiated retarding-electric current scans to study outgoing energies.[ref]
Their 1925 Nobel Prize preceded their lectures of 11 December 1926. James Franck described choosing pressure for many collisions before the mesh but few afterward.[ref]
Transformations of Kinetic Energy of Free Electrons into Excitation Energy of Atoms by Impacts by James Franck. Nobel Lectures, Physics 1922–1941; pp. 98, 100–101
Gustav Ludwig Hertz explained how a field-free collision region narrowed excitation thresholds.[ref]The Results of the Electron-Impact Tests in the Light of Bohr’s Theory of Atoms by Gustav Ludwig Hertz. Nobel Lectures, Physics 1922–1941; pp. 112, 119–120
Gustav Ludwig Hertz 2026-10-18
Physics.[ref]
https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Hertz_Gustav/. Independent professional profile
Portrait of Gustav Ludwig Hertz
. Source. Nobel Prize in Physics in 1925 2026-10-18
Awarded jointly to James Franck and Gustav Ludwig Hertz for electron-impact laws in chemical atoms. They received the prize in 1926; the Franck-Hertz experiment explains the evidence.[ref]
The Nobel Prize in Physics 1925 by Nobel Prize Outreach. Official award record: Franck and Hertz, electron impact and deferred receipt in 1926
