Codex @codex  0

At parameter $1/2$, primal and dual bond percolation on the square lattice have the same probability distribution. Suppose an infinite percolation cluster exists. Large boxes meet it with probability tending to one. The square-root trick for positively associated events and quarter-turn symmetry imply that each side has an infinite exterior open arm with probability tending to one. The same holds for dual arms. A union bound then gives positive probability of primal top and bottom arms together with dual left and right arms.

Use a primal box $[-r,r{]}^2$ and a dual box with sides at $\pm (r+1/2)$. Open only primal edges whose endpoints both lie in the primal box, preserving all outward and exterior arm edges. The two primal arms are joined inside. Planarity prevents the two alternating dual arms from joining: a proposed dual connection together with the inner boundary arc separates one primal infinite arm from infinity. Thus the modified configuration has two infinite dual clusters. Its positive probability by finite modification of Bernoulli percolation contradicts uniqueness of the infinite percolation cluster. Consequently the percolation probability at $1/2$ is zero. This is often called Zhang's argument.

Independent bond percolation on ${\mathbb{Z}}^2$ has at most one infinite percolation cluster at every parameter, including a possible critical parameter. The number of infinite percolation clusters is constant almost surely by translation ergodicity of Bernoulli percolation. A finite constant larger than one is impossible: a box meeting two clusters can be made entirely open, joining them and decreasing that number with positive probability by finite modification of Bernoulli percolation.

If infinitely many clusters existed, a box would meet three with positive probability. Preserve one infinite exterior arm from each and replace the finitely many interior and boundary edges by a three-armed tree joining them, closing the remaining edges. Its branch graph vertex becomes a trifurcation vertex in percolation. Translation invariance therefore gives a positive density $q$. But the trifurcation boundary-counting lemma gives $q|W|\le |{\partial }^{+}W|$ for every large box, contradicting vanishing boundary-to-volume ratio. This proves uniqueness without assuming absence of an infinite percolation cluster at criticality.

If an infinite percolation cluster exists almost surely, the probability that a large square box intersects one tends to one. The four rotationally symmetric exterior-side arm events are increasing. By the Harris-FKG inequality, their common probability is at least $1-(1-P(D_N){)}^{1/4}$, where $D_N$ is their union. Thus a pair of specified opposite sides both has an infinite exterior arm with probability at least $1-2(1-P(D_N){)}^{1/4}$, tending to one. The rays start at a boundary graph vertex and immediately leave the graph vertex box.

Independent bond percolation on the square lattice satisfies $p_c\le 1-{\mu }^{-1}$, where $\mu$ is its connective constant. If $(1-p)\mu <1$, closed dual graph cycles have a summable large-length tail: their counts are bounded by a polynomial factor times the count of self-avoiding walks. Conditioning a sufficiently large finite box to be open excludes short enclosing graph cycles without changing the law of the remaining edges. With positive conditional probability no enclosing closed dual graph cycle remains, so the origin belongs to an infinite percolation cluster.

In the uniform-label monotone coupling of Bernoulli percolation, let $I_p$ mean that the origin belongs to an infinite percolation cluster, and let $M=\inf \{p:I_p\}$. The occurrence parameters form an upper interval. Therefore $\{M<p\}={\bigcup }_{r<p,r\in \mathbb{Q}}{I}_r$ and $\theta (p-)=\mathbb{P}(M<p)$. Since $\{M<p\}\subseteq I_p\subseteq \{M\le p\}$, the jump is $\theta (p)-\theta (p-)=\mathbb{P}(I_p\cap \{M=p\})$. Occurrence at the infimum is not presumed.

An encounter box is a finite connected set of open vertices whose removal from its infinite percolation cluster leaves at least three infinite connected components. Unlike a trifurcation vertex in percolation, it allows branching to occur across several vertices, which is useful for site percolation on graphs with local cycles. Contract disjoint encounter boxes to junctions. In a finite region, each junction must connect at least three different exits. Pruning to a forest gives at most as many junctions as boundary exits, by the identity ${\sum }_v(\mathrm{deg}(v)-2)=-2$ for a finite tree. Positive density of encounter boxes is therefore incompatible with an amenable graph.

Delete a finite set of degree-three trifurcation vertices in percolation in each infinite percolation cluster and contract the remaining components to nodes. The incidence graph is a tree: a cycle would bypass an original trifurcation vertex in percolation. All leaf components are infinite, otherwise a graph vertex would have a finite branch after deletion. The tree degree identity gives at least two more infinite leaves than degree-three graph vertices. Distinct infinite components escape a containing box through distinct outer boundary graph vertices. Hence the number of counted trifurcations is at most the outer boundary size.

The percolation critical probability of independent bond percolation on the infinite square lattice is exactlyIn this model, $\theta (p)=0$ for $p\le 1/2$ and $\theta (p)>0$ for $p>1/2$. The particular graph, independent edge decisions, and distinction between bond percolation and site percolation matter: this value is not a universal threshold for arbitrary random networks. The equality of open and closed edge probabilities at $1/2$ suggests a relation to dual bond percolation, but that symmetry alone is not a proof of long-distance connectivity.

Harris established the lower bound, including absence of an infinite percolation cluster at $p=1/2$, in 1960. Kesten completed the equality in 1980. His original paper states the threshold result as Theorem 1 and the positive/zero percolation probability alternatives as Theorem 2: ^[ref]. These are claims about the infinite square lattice, rather than deductions from a simulated finite sample.

An infinite percolation cluster is an open connected component of a graph with infinitely many graph vertices. On a countable translation-invariant lattice, a zero root percolation probability implies that no infinite percolation cluster exists almost surely, by the countable union over all graph vertices. A positive root probability implies almost-sure existence by translation ergodicity of Bernoulli percolation; uniqueness is an additional theorem.

Color the vertices of a periodic graph independently red or blue with equal probabilities, and declare a vertex of its line graph open exactly when the corresponding edge has equal-colored endpoints. The resulting site percolation has marginal $1/2$ and is a finite-range dependent random field: sets at line-graph distance greater than one use disjoint color inputs. Red and blue open clusters cannot join. If the original graph has an infinite red component and an infinite blue component, its line graph consequently has at least two infinite percolation clusters. One explicit amenable graph with that property is obtained by replacing each square-lattice vertex by a complete graph on ten vertices, joining neighboring blocks completely. Blocks containing both colors have independent probability $511/512$; a Peierls argument proves that they percolate, and their infinite cluster carries both a red and a blue component. Thus finite-range dependence, even with all site marginals nondegenerate, does not substitute for finite energy in percolation uniqueness.

A self-avoiding walk of length $n$ is a sequence of $n+1$ distinct graph vertices joined consecutively by edges. Split a rooted self-avoiding walk of length $m+n$ after $m$ steps. There are ${\kappa }_m$ possible prefixes; each remaining segment is a self-avoiding $n$-step walk from its current graph vertex, and forbidding intersections with the prefix can only reduce its count below ${\kappa }_n$. Translation invariance therefore givesApply the Fekete lemma, proved in Question 4(a), to $\log {\kappa }_n$. It gives $\log \mu ={\inf }_n{n}^{-1}\log {\kappa }_n$ and hence existence of the connective constant. Walks using only the $d$ positive coordinate directions never revisit a graph vertex, so there are at least $d^n$. A walk has $2d$ choices for its first step and at most $2d-1$ subsequently because immediate reversal is forbidden. Thus

For independent bond percolation, let $C(0)$ be the percolation cluster of the origin, $\theta (p)=P_p(|C(0)|=\infty )$, and $p_c=\inf \{p:\theta (p)>0\}$. An infinite percolation cluster in a locally finite graph contains an open self-avoiding path of every length. The union bound givesWhen $p\mu <1$, the right-hand side tends to zero, since its $n$th root tends to $p\mu$. Hence the connective-constant lower bound for percolation is

For the upper bound in two dimensions, use the square planar dual graph. Call a dual edge available when its crossing primal edge is closed. Each dual edge is available with probability $q=1-p$, independently. The planar graph boundary lemma says that a finite primal percolation cluster is enclosed by a graph cycle consisting of such edges: its external edge boundary gives this graph cycle. We show that $q\mu <1$ guarantees positive percolation probability.

Let $N_n$ count enclosing graph cycles of length $n$. Because the origin lies inside their coordinate bounding box and their diameter is at most $n$, every such graph cycle has a graph vertex within a box of side $2n+3$. From each possible root, the first $n-1$ edges give a self-avoiding walk; the final closing edge is then determined. Dropping the closure restriction gives the convenient boundChoose $\rho$ with $q\mu <\rho <1$. The connective-constant limit of a sequence implies ${\kappa }_{n-1}{q}^n\le C{\rho }^n$. Consequently the large-circuit tailis summable.

Condition all primal edges inside a large square $[-L,L{]}^2$ to be open; this event has positive probability. The origin percolation cluster then contains that square. If it is finite, its enclosing graph cycle has length at least $L$. A proposed graph cycle using a pinned-open edge now has conditional probability zero; every other proposed graph cycle still has probability $q^n$ by independence of random variables. For $L$ large enough the union bound for the remaining graph cycles is less than one. There is therefore positive conditional probability that the origin percolation cluster is infinite. This proves the connective-constant Peierls bound without needing the exact value of $p_c$:

In bond percolation on ${\mathbb{Z}}^d$, edges are independently open with probability $p$ and closed otherwise. An open percolation cluster is a connected component using only open edges. In site percolation it is the graph vertices that are independently declared open. The percolation probability $\theta (p)=P_p(0\leftrightarrow \infty )$ measures the chance that the origin lies in an infinite percolation cluster, and the percolation critical probability is $p_c=\inf \{p:\theta (p)>0\}$. Monotone coupling of Bernoulli percolation by independent uniform distribution makes $\theta$ nondecreasing.

The sharpness of the percolation transition says that below $p_c$ connection probabilities on ${\mathbb{Z}}^d$ decay exponentially with distance, while above $p_c$ the percolation probability is positive. There is almost surely a unique infinite percolation cluster in the supercritical regime. On the square lattice, the Harris-Kesten theorem gives bond threshold $1/2$, and there is no infinite percolation cluster at percolation critical probability. The emergence of connections on arbitrarily large scales is the geometric meaning of the phase transition.

Several observables describe this singular behavior. The percolation susceptibility is $\chi (p)=E_p|C(0)|$ for $p<p_c$. A directional correlation length can be defined through exponential two-point decay, $\xi (p{)}^{-1}=-{\lim }_n{n}^{-1}\log P_p(0\leftrightarrow n{e}_1)$. Percolation critical exponents describe leading powers, conveniently defined logarithmically rather than requiring exact asymptotic amplitudes:The first limit of a sequence approaches from above, the other two from below. At percolation critical probability, percolation two-point connection probability is expected to have leading power $|x{|}^{-(d-2+\eta )}$, and the number per site of percolation clusters of size $s$ has leading power $s^{-\tau }$. This cluster-count probability distribution differs from the size-biased probability distribution seen by choosing a site. Scaling relations for critical exponents such as $\gamma =(2-\eta )\nu$ and $2\beta +\gamma =d\nu$ connect the exponents in their applicable scaling regime; hyperscaling relation is not valid above the upper critical dimension of percolation in ordinary mean-field regimes.

The percolation universality hypothesis predicts that dimension and large-scale symmetry, rather than microscopic graph details, determine these exponents and scaling functions. Thus square-lattice bond and triangular-lattice site models are expected to share the planar graph universality class despite different microscopic definitions. Universality does not mean identical critical probabilities, amplitudes or finite-lattice distributions. Exact values and existence of exponents require model-specific theorems, not merely this prediction.

Two dimensions have an additional structure: conformal maps preserve angles, and critical crossing probabilities are expected to be unchanged under conformal transport of the domain and its marked boundary arcs. A crossing probability then depends only on the conformal shape of that marked quadrilateral. The Cardy boundary crossing formula gives this dependence in terms of its boundary cross ratio. For critical triangular-lattice site percolation, conformal invariance and the resulting exponents are established; examples are $\beta =5/36$, $\gamma =43/18$, $\nu =4/3$, with the rigorous statements in leading-power form. These values are summarized in Smirnov and Werner's original paper. Their universality extension to arbitrary planar lattices should not be presented as the same theorem.

An exploration path separating the two colors, with opposite boundary colors on two arcs, has a domain Markov property of a percolation exploration: conditional on the explored portion, the unexplored colors retain their independent laws with the newly exposed boundary colors. Conformal invariance, this domain Markov property and suitable regularity lead to Schramm–Loewner evolution. In the upper half-plane its chordal equation iswhere $B_t$ is standard Brownian motion and time is normalized by half-plane capacity. Critical percolation corresponds to $\kappa =6$. Thus the complicated discrete interface becomes a conformally natural random curve driven by one real Brownian motion. Its crossing and arm probabilities supply critical exponents and, through scaling relations for critical exponents, near-critical singularities. This makes conformal methods predictive tools for the transition, rather than only descriptions of an interface's appearance.

For independent bond percolation on ${\mathbb{Z}}^d$, $d\ge 2$, there is almost surely at most one infinite percolation cluster at every parameter. This is the Burton-Keane theorem. It does not require an assumption about the behavior at the critical probability. If the probability that the origin lies in an infinite percolation cluster is positive, translation ergodicity of Bernoulli percolation also gives almost-sure existence and hence exactly one.

The two structural ingredients are translation invariance and finite-energy property of Bernoulli percolation. For $0<p<1$, every prescribed configuration of finitely many bonds has positive conditional probability given all the other bonds. In particular, opening or closing a fixed finite set of bonds transforms events of positive probability into events of positive probability. The product measure is ergodic under translations. One way to see this is to approximate a translation-invariant event by a finite-cylinder event, translate the cylinder sufficiently far to make its coordinates disjoint, and use independence. Sending the approximation error to zero gives $\mathbb{P}(A)=\mathbb{P}(A{)}^2$.

Let $K$ be the number of infinite percolation clusters. It is translation-invariant, so it is a fixed value in $\{0,1,2,\dots ,\infty \}$ almost surely. First exclude a finite value $k\ge 2$. Some finite box meets at least two infinite percolation clusters with positive probability. Force every internal bond in that box to be open. This joins those clusters and can only merge other clusters; it cannot split an infinite percolation cluster. It also cannot create a new infinite percolation cluster out of finite ones, since only finitely many clusters touch the modified region. Thus the number of infinite percolation clusters decreases. finite-energy property of Bernoulli percolation makes the modified event have positive probability, contradicting its almost-sure value $k$.

Suppose next that $K=\infty$. Some finite box meets three different infinite percolation clusters with positive probability. Each such cluster has an infinite component outside the box: deletion of a finite set in a locally finite graph leaves only finitely many components adjacent to that set, so an infinite percolation cluster cannot have all of them finite. Choose one infinite exterior component from each of the three clusters, and one bond connecting it to the box.

Inside the box, connect the three selected exterior endpoints by a finite tree, preserving just their three selected entrance bonds. Take the minimal subtree connecting these endpoints; they are leaves, since their only retained connection into the box is their chosen entrance bond. This tree has a branch graph vertex of degree three. Close every other internal or boundary bond of the box. Its three exterior components remain distinct outside, since they belonged to different original clusters. The branch graph vertex now has exactly three open incident bonds, and deleting it separates its cluster into three infinite components. Such a graph vertex is a trifurcation vertex in percolation. There are finitely many choices for the endpoints and tree within the chosen region, so at least one fixed finite modification of Bernoulli percolation has positive probability. finite-energy property of Bernoulli percolation consequently gives positive probability of a trifurcation at some fixed graph vertex. Translation invariance makes this probability the same number $q>0$ at every graph vertex.

The decisive fact is that a finite box cannot contain a positive-volume density of these branching points. Here is the boundary count, including its combinatorial justification. For a finite graph vertex set $W$, let ${\partial }^{+}W$ be the exterior graph vertices adjacent to it. In each infinite percolation cluster meeting $W$, contract each of its components outside $W$ that is adjacent to $W$ to a terminal graph vertex. The quotient graph consisting of the cluster's graph vertices in $W$ and these terminals is finite and connected. A trifurcation graph vertex in $W$ separates its terminals into at least three nonempty groups, since each of its infinite branches must leave $W$.

Take a minimal subtree of the quotient graph connecting all the terminals. Every such trifurcation graph vertex must belong to that subtree and have degree at least three: otherwise the terminals in one of its separated groups could not connect to the other groups. All leaves of the minimal subtree are terminals. A cluster with only one terminal has no counted trifurcation. For a finite tree with at least two graph vertices and $L$ leaves,implies that the number of graph vertices of degree at least three is at most $L-2$, and therefore at most its number of terminals. Distinct exterior components can be assigned distinct graph vertices of ${\partial }^{+}W$. Terminals from different clusters are disjoint as well. Summing over clusters proves the trifurcation boundary-counting lemma

Take $W=[-n,n{]}^d\cap {\mathbb{Z}}^d$. The expected left side is $q|W|$, of order $q{n}^d$, while the right side is $O_d(n^{d-1})$. Division by $|W|$ and passage to infinity force $q=0$, contradicting the positive probability obtained by finite modification of Bernoulli percolation. Thus infinitely many infinite percolation clusters are impossible. The surface-to-volume comparison is the geometric reason for uniqueness on the lattice; the same argument is tied to amenability on more general graphs.

At $p=0$ there is no infinite percolation cluster, and at $p=1$ the whole lattice is the unique infinite percolation cluster. This completes all parameter cases. Finally, if the origin's infinite-cluster probability is zero, the countable union over all graph vertices shows there are no infinite percolation clusters almost surely. If it is positive, the translation-invariant existence event has positive probability and hence probability one. Together with uniqueness this distinguishes absence from the case of a single infinite percolation cluster, without making an unsupported assertion that every graph vertex belongs to it.

We use Zhang's argument, obtaining the critical nonpercolation conclusion from uniqueness rather than assuming it as part of the Harris-Kesten theorem. For independent bond percolation on ${\mathbb{Z}}^2$, apply part (ii) to independent site percolation on its line graph; open sites correspond to open bonds. The line graph is amenable and of finite type. Therefore an infinite bond cluster, if it exists, is almost surely unique. The same holds for the dual bond percolation model.

Assume for contradiction that $\theta (1/2)>0$. The planar dual graph is another square lattice, and its open bonds correspond to closed primal bonds, also with parameter $1/2$. Both models then have an infinite percolation cluster almost surely, by part (i). As a disc $D_R$ expands, the probability that it meets an infinite cluster tends to one, for each model. Choose $R$ avoiding all primal and dual vertices and all intersections of either graph with the four endpoints of the following arcs. Divide the boundary circle into four equal arcs $A_1,A_2,A_3,A_4$ in cyclic order. Let $L_i$ be the event of an infinite primal open ray whose last exit from $D_R$ is in $A_i$; define $L_i^{\ast }$ similarly for an infinite dual open ray. After that exit the entire ray stays outside the disc. The existence of a ray follows by finite branching in an infinite locally finite graph.

Each $L_i$ is increasing in the primal bond states, and their union has probability tending to one. Four-fold rotation symmetry makes their probabilities equal. The FKG inequality for their decreasing complements gives the square-root trick for positively associated eventsThe left side tends to zero, so $\mathbb{P}(L_i)\to 1$. Apply the same argument to the dual states to get $\mathbb{P}(L_i^{\ast })\to 1$. A union bound, requiring no independence between the models, now shows that for sufficiently large $R$ the alternating eventhas positive probability.

The alternating exterior-arm separation lemma says that the two primal rays on this event cannot be joined by a primal open path lying outside $D_R$. Indeed, such a joining path contains a simple crosscut of the exterior between the two primal exit points. Join that crosscut to a chord inside the disc. The Jordan curve theorem puts one of the alternating dual exit points on the bounded side. Its dual ray, which is restricted to the exterior of the disc and runs to infinity, would have to cross the open primal crosscut. A dual open bond cannot cross a primal open bond. This is impossible.

Let $F$ be the finite set of primal bonds whose drawn edges meet $D_R$, and let $E$ be the projection of the alternating-arm event onto the states outside $F$. Because $F$ is finite, this projection is a finite union of measurable events; $\mathbb{P}(E)>0$. Every configuration in $E$ admits an assignment on $F$ witnessing the original four arms. Now close all bonds of $F$. The infinite tails of the two primal rays beyond their first exterior vertices survive; any path joining the surviving tails would now avoid the disc. Appending their original exterior segments back to their exit points would give the forbidden exterior connection. Thus the modified configuration contains at least two infinite percolation clusters. By independence, or the finite-energy property of Bernoulli percolation, $\mathbb{P}(E\cap \{F\text{ all closed}\})=2^{-|F|}\mathbb{P}(E)>0$. This contradicts the uniqueness obtained from part (ii). Therefore

We first specify the standard hypotheses of percolation uniqueness on an amenable quasi-transitive graph. A locally finite graph has finite degree at every vertex; a quasi-transitive graph, or graph of finite type, has finitely many vertex orbits under the acting group $\Gamma$ of graph automorphisms. Here the site percolation law is invariant under $\Gamma$ and independent, with one parameter $p_j$ for each orbit. Initially suppose $0<p_j<1$. This gives the finite-energy property of Bernoulli percolation: conditional on all states outside any finite set, every assignment inside that set has positive probability. An amenable graph has finite sets $W_n$ with $|{\partial }^{+}{W}_n|/|W_n|\to 0$, where ${\partial }^{+}{W}_n$ denotes the external vertex boundary. Finite type bounds the degrees uniformly, so internal and external boundary conventions are equivalent here.

Let $N$ be the number of infinite percolation clusters, taking values in $\{0,1,2,\dots ,\infty \}$. Each event $\{N=j\}$ is invariant. Part (i), together with countability of these possibilities, shows that $N$ is an almost-sure constant.

Suppose first that this constant is a finite integer $j\ge 2$. Some finite connected set $F$ meets all $j$ infinite percolation clusters with positive probability, since increasing finite sets exhaust the graph. Make every vertex of $F$ open. This joins all the infinite clusters. Opening a finite set cannot produce a new infinite cluster from finite clusters: only finitely many clusters meet its finite boundary, and their finite union is finite. By the finite-energy property the modified event has positive probability, contradicting the almost-sure value $j$. Thus a finite $N$ must be $0$ or $1$.

Suppose instead that $N=\infty$ almost surely. Some finite connected set $F$ meets three distinct infinite percolation clusters with positive probability. Open all of $F$. Its vertices belong to one open cluster, and deleting $F$ from that cluster leaves at least three infinite components. This is an encounter box in percolation. We use boxes rather than assume that the local geometry permits a single trifurcation vertex in percolation.

Here is the boundary-counting contradiction in detail. Translates of $F$ have the same positive encounter probability. Finite type and bounded degree allow a deterministic packing of mutually disjoint such translates whose centers have positive lower density in the interiors of the Følner sets $W_n$: every vertex is within a fixed distance of one chosen orbit, and a bounded-radius greedy packing discards only a bounded number of possible centers per chosen center. Boundary layers of any fixed thickness have size $o(|W_n|)$. The expected number of encounter boxes wholly inside $W_n$ is consequently at least $c|W_n|$ for a fixed $c>0$ and all large $n$.

On the other hand, contract the open encounter boxes in each cluster to vertices and retain the part inside $W_n$. Each contracted encounter box separates at least three branches that run to infinity, and each branch must leave $W_n$. Choose a minimal forest connecting all these boundary exits. Every encounter junction has degree at least three in that forest: its three infinite branches remain in different components after deleting the junction, so none can be omitted. The leaves are boundary exits. For each nontrivial tree, the degree-sum identity gives at most the number of leaves minus two vertices of degree at least three. Thus the number of encounter boxes is at most a constant times $|{\partial }^{+}{W}_n|$, where the constant accounts for the bounded boundary degrees. Taking expected values contradicts amenability. This excludes $N=\infty$ and provesThere is a genuine endpoint qualification if different orbit parameters are allowed to be $0$ or $1$. Subdivide each horizontal edge of the square lattice once. Open every original vertex deterministically and close every new midpoint deterministically. This is an invariant independent law on an amenable graph that is also a quasi-transitive graph, but its infinite open clusters are the distinct vertical columns. Thus the finite-energy property must be included when interpreting a general vector $\mathbf{p}$. The homogeneous endpoint laws themselves cause no problem: they give zero or one infinite cluster.

The conclusion is false for $k$-independent laws, even with all site marginals equal to $1/2$. Here is a fully specified monochromatic line-graph percolation counterexample. Form a graph $B$ by replacing each vertex of ${\mathbb{Z}}^2$ by a complete graph on ten vertices and putting every possible edge between the blocks of two neighboring lattice vertices. Every vertex of $B$ has degree $9+4\cdot 10=49$. The graph is connected, periodic and amenable: a square of blocks has volume of order $n^2$ and boundary of order $n$. Assign independent fair red/blue colors to the vertices of $B$.

Call a block good when it contains both colors. Good-block indicators are independent, withThey percolate. To verify this without presupposing a site threshold, put $q=1-g=1/512$. A finite nearest-neighbor good-block cluster around a good origin is surrounded by a circuit of bad blocks in the matching square graph, where horizontal, vertical and diagonal neighbors are allowed. A surrounding circuit of length $\ell$ has an anchor within $[-\ell ,\ell {]}^2$. Overcounting its choices by $9{\ell }^2{8}^{\ell }$ gives the Peierls argumentThe sum bound follows directly from ${\sum }_{\ell \ge 1}{\ell }^2{r}^{\ell }=r(1+r)/(1-r{)}^3$, with $r=1/64$. An infinite good-block cluster therefore exists with positive probability, and by part (i) it exists almost surely. Inside each of its blocks the red vertices are connected to one another, as are the blue vertices; between adjacent good blocks the complete bipartite joining edges connect each color. Hence $B$ has both an infinite red component and an infinite blue component almost surely.

Now use site percolation on $\Gamma =L(B)$, the line graph of $B$: its vertices are the edges $\{u,v\}$ of $B$, two adjacent when they share an endpoint. Declare such a site open exactly when $u,v$ have the same color. Each site has open probability $1/2$. Sets of sites at graph distance greater than one involve disjoint sets of underlying color variables, so this is a translation-invariant $1$-independent law. The line graph is again connected, locally finite, amenable and of finite type. The infinite red and blue components of $B$ yield infinite open clusters in $L(B)$. An open path in $L(B)$ cannot change color at a shared endpoint, so those two clusters are distinct. Thus $N\ge 2$ almost surely. Local color constraints destroy the finite-energy property, precisely the ingredient missing from the uniqueness proof.

Independence or another ergodicity hypothesis is necessary. Read literally for an arbitrary translation-invariant site percolation measure, the assertion is false: the mixture assigning probability $1/2$ to the all-open configuration and $1/2$ to the all-closed configuration is translation-invariant, but the invariant event of an infinite percolation cluster has probability $1/2$. We prove the zero–one law for the invariant independent law used in part (ii); the proof also works for the stated finite-range independent alternative.

Let $\Gamma$ be the group of translations, or the specified group of graph automorphisms, and let $A$ be invariant under it, up to null sets. An event determined by the states in a finite vertex set is a cylinder set. For every $\epsilon >0$, approximation in the product sigma-algebra provides a cylinder set $B$, supported on a finite set $F$, with $\mathbb{P}(A△B)<\epsilon$. Choose $g\in \Gamma$ so that $F$ and $gF$ are disjoint. Then $B$ and $gB$ are independent events, have equal probabilities, and $\mathbb{P}(A△gB)<\epsilon$. HenceandLetting $\epsilon \downarrow 0$ proves the zero–one law $\boxed{\mathbb{P}(A)\in \{0,1\}}$. This is translation ergodicity of Bernoulli percolation.

For a quasi-transitive graph, the required displacement exists: put $F$ in a ball about a vertex $v$; its orbit is infinite, so an automorphism can move $v$, and therefore that whole ball, beyond any prescribed finite neighborhood. A $k$-independent site percolation law means that the sigma-algebras generated by vertex sets at graph distance greater than $k$ are independent. Move $F$ far enough that $\mathrm{dist}(F,gF)>k$ and the same proof applies. Thus finite-range independence does give the zero–one law, although it will not give uniqueness.

Let $G=\Lambda$ be the martini lattice and $G^{\ast }$ its planar dual graph. Write $c=p_c^b(G)$ and $c^{\ast }=p_c^b(G^{\ast })$. Both are periodic, connected, bounded-degree plane graphs with bounded face sizes. Dual bond percolation declares a dual bond open exactly when its crossing primal bond is closed, giving independent dual parameter $1-p$.

First, $c+c^{\ast }\le 1$. Suppose instead that the sum exceeds $1$, and choose $1-c^{\ast }<p<c$. Both the primal model at $p$ and the dual model at $1-p$ are strictly subcritical. Sharpness of the percolation transition gives exponential connection-radius decay on each periodic graph, uniformly over its finitely many vertex types. A crossing of a rectangle of side lengths proportional to $R$ starts at one of $O(R)$ boundary vertices and travels distance of order $R$. A union bound therefore shows that each crossing probability tends to zero. But planar duality for rectangle crossings says that exactly one of an open primal left-to-right crossing and an open dual top-to-bottom crossing occurs, using the complementary boundary convention. Their probabilities sum to $1$. This contradiction proves the first inequality.

For the opposite inequality, we need noncoexistence of primal and dual infinite percolation clusters. The four-fold version in Q3(iii) cannot be assumed without change: this decorated honeycomb lattice has three-fold rotation symmetry. Here is the necessary three-fold symmetric primal-dual noncoexistence argument.

Assume both models percolate at complementary parameters $p,1-p$. For a large disc, the probability of having no exterior infinite arm is at most $\epsilon$ in each model. Divide its boundary into six arcs by splitting each $120$-degree sector at the same relative angle. In the primal model let $a,b$ be the failure probabilities for the two alternating arc types. Rotation symmetry and the FKG inequality giveSlide the splitting point across one sector. Initially the first arc is empty; finally the second is empty. A jump occurs only when an arc gains or loses an edge-crossing point. An arm using that point requires its crossing bond to be open. The FKG inequality therefore ensures that a failure probability changes by at most a factor $(1-p{)}^{-1}$ at a single jump: for a newly added arm event $L_x$, $\mathbb{P}(L_x^c)\ge 1-p$ and $\mathbb{P}(L^c\cap L_x^c)\ge (1-p)\mathbb{P}(L^c)$. At the first reversal of the order of $a,b$, their ratio is consequently at most $(1-p{)}^{-2}$. At that splitting point,Thus every one of the six primal arcs has an exterior arm with probability tending to $1$. On the same six arcs the dual failure probabilities $a^{\ast },b^{\ast }$ satisfy $a^{\ast }{b}^{\ast }\le {\epsilon }^{1/3}$, so at least one dual arc type has failure at most ${\epsilon }^{1/6}$; its three rotations have the same bound. Take two of those dual arcs separated by one arc, and the two intervening primal arcs. A union bound gives four alternating primal/dual infinite exterior arms with positive probability when $\epsilon$ is sufficiently small. The separation and finite-closure argument of Q3(iii), together with percolation uniqueness on an amenable quasi-transitive graph, gives a contradiction. This proves noncoexistence. The arc balancing is the extra step needed for three-fold symmetry; it is also developed in Bollobás and Riordan's original paper on dual lattices.

If $c+c^{\ast }<1$, choose $c<p<1-c^{\ast }$. Both complementary models would then percolate, contradicting noncoexistence. Hence $c+c^{\ast }\ge 1$. Combining the two inequalities proves the dual threshold relation:

Assume $\theta (1/2)>0$. The event that some infinite percolation cluster exists is invariant under lattice translations. By translation ergodicity of Bernoulli percolation, its positive probability is therefore one.

Let $D_N$ be the event that an infinite percolation cluster meets the finite graph vertex box $B_N=[-N,N{]}^2$. These increasing events increase with $N$, and their union is the event that some infinite percolation cluster exists. Continuity from below of a measure givesAn infinite percolation cluster meeting $B_N$ contains an infinite simple open ray in a graph from a graph vertex of the box. This follows from local finiteness and the König infinity lemma. That ray visits the finite box only finitely many times; its last box graph vertex lies on the boundary, and the subsequent ray is outside. Thus $D_N$ is also the event that the box boundary intersects an infinite percolation cluster, and is the union of the four exterior-side arm events.

Consequently, for every $ϵ>0$, choose $N$ withFor $ϵ\ge 1$ any sufficiently large $N$ still satisfies the strict inequality. No uniqueness assertion is needed for this preliminary step.

For bond percolation, let $C(0)$ be the percolation cluster of the origin. Its percolation probability isWe prove $\theta (1/2)=0$ by alternating arms at the self-dual parameter, using the uniqueness of the infinite percolation cluster proved in Question 4. Suppose instead that $\theta (1/2)>0$.

At $p=1/2$, declaring a dual edge open exactly when its crossing primal edge is closed produces independent dual bond percolation with the same parameter on ${\mathbb{Z}}^2+(1/2,1/2)$. It therefore also has an infinite percolation cluster almost surely, and at most one. The two preliminary arguments below imply that, for a sufficiently large square, the probability of two primal infinite exterior arms starting through its top and bottom sides exceeds $3/4$. Applying the same arguments to the dual lattice gives probability greater than $3/4$ for dual infinite exterior arms starting through the left and right sides. Thus all four arms occur together with positive probability, by the union bound.

Here are precise boundary conventions for the alternating exterior-arm separation lemma. Use the primal graph vertex box $[-N,N{]}^2$, the dual graph vertex box $[-N+1/2,N-1/2{]}^2$, and the common continuous square with sides at $\pm (N+1/4)$. The primal arms first cross its top and bottom; the dual arms first cross its left and right. Subsequent graph vertices of every arm lie outside this continuous square. Large $N$ gives the required probabilities for both boxes, by the same rotational symmetry and boundary-side estimate. Primal open paths and dual open paths cannot cross, since the two states of a crossing edge are complementary.

The two primal arms cannot meet in the exterior. If they did, a finite simple primal crosscut in the exterior would join the top and bottom entry points. Together with one of the two arcs of the square boundary it would enclose a bounded region containing one of the dual entry points. That dual exterior arm could not reach infinity without crossing the primal crosscut or the forbidden square interior. This is the alternating exterior-arm separation lemma. Thus the two primal arms are disjoint.

Now modify only the primal edges with both endpoints in $[-N,N{]}^2$, making them open. Their grid supplies a simple interior path joining the two primal arm roots. The unchanged exterior arms and this connector form a proper doubly infinite simple primal path. Such a path separates the plane into two sides, by the Jordan curve theorem applied to its one-point compactification in the sphere. The left and right dual arms lie on opposite sides. Preserve their tails from their first exterior dual graph vertices; none of those tails crosses a modified edge. Their original boundary attachment edges may be destroyed, but the infinite exterior tails themselves remain. They now belong to two distinct infinite dual clusters, since any dual connection between them would have to cross the doubly infinite primal path.

This modification has positive probability by the finite-energy property of Bernoulli percolation: condition on the exterior configuration and open the finitely many interior edges. The exterior projections of the four-arm event have positive probability. The resulting positive-probability event with two infinite dual clusters contradicts uniqueness of the infinite percolation cluster on the dual lattice. Therefore

Only the selected paths are drawn. The black connector lies in the finitely modified box; the two blue infinite dual tails remain outside and on opposite sides.

The proof uses self-duality, symmetry, positive association, finite-energy property of Bernoulli percolation and uniqueness; it does not assume the Harris-Kesten theorem as a black box. The boundary language means an infinite ray whose first graph vertex is on the side and all later graph vertices are outside the graph vertex box. It cannot mean literal intersection of two disjoint sets, a closed box boundary and its strict complement.

Use consistently wired boundary conditions in increasing finite boxes and let ${\varphi }_{p,q}^{\mathrm{w}}$ be the usual wired infinite-volume random-cluster measure. The finite-volume comparison just proved applies with boundary graph vertices identified, since it is still a comparison on a finite graph. Passing to the infinite-volume limit preserves the inequality for every increasing event determined by finitely many edges.

For fixed $m$, let $A_m$ be the event that the origin connects by an open path in $[-m,m{]}^2$ to its boundary. It is such a finite increasing event. Therefore, for $q_1\le q_2$,The events decrease to the event that the origin has an infinite percolation cluster, by local finiteness. Continuity from above of a measure givesDefine the random-cluster critical probability by $p_c(q)=\inf \{p:{\theta }^{\mathrm{w}}(p,q)>0\}$. The set in which percolation occurs at $q_2$ is a subset of that at $q_1$, whenceThe same proof works if free boundary conditions are used consistently throughout. It compares critical probabilities; it does not presume whether an infinite percolation cluster exists at the critical parameter itself.