The Lebesgue decomposition theorem separates the absolutely continuous part from the singular part. BV fine structure then splits the latter into the jump part of a BV derivative and the Cantor part of a BV derivative. The density of the absolutely continuous part is the almost-everywhere approximate gradient. These three mutually singular components distinguish smooth variation, surface discontinuities and diffuse singular variation.
Dyadic density martingale 2026-10-14
For a finite positive measure on , average its mass over each half-open dyadic interval. The resulting nonnegative martingale has constant expectation : a parent interval's mass is the sum of its children's masses. Its almost-sure limit is integrable but the martingale need not be uniformly integrable. The limit recovers the density of the absolutely continuous component in the Lebesgue decomposition theorem.
We construct the density and singular part, rather than assuming the desired Lebesgue decomposition theorem. Put , a finite dominating measure, and use the real Hilbert space . The linear functional
is well defined on its equivalence classes, since a -null set is -null. The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and give
By the Riesz representation theorem, there is with . Indicators of all measurable sets belong to this Hilbert space, so
The nonnegativity of these two measures forces almost everywhere. For instance, if , its -measure would be negative; the analogous sets contradict positivity of . Their countable union excludes every violation. Modify on its measurable -null exceptional set so that these inequalities hold everywhere. This is the Hilbert-space construction of dominated measure densities.
Define
Then , is a nonnegative measurable function, and . The identity for integration against follows first for indicators, then for nonnegative simple functions and finally for all nonnegative functions by the monotone convergence theorem. Applying it to gives
In particular , so . Additivity on the disjoint measurable sets and now gives
This is the Lebesgue decomposition from a sum-measure density: the first measure has a density, and the second is concentrated on a -null set, so is mutually singular with .
The absolute continuity of measures condition means that implies for every . If this holds, then , eliminating the singular part above. Conversely, a measure of the form vanishes on every -null set. Therefore
Thus absolute continuity is exactly the absence of the singular part in this construction.
The pushforward measure of under is
The Lebesgue decomposition theorem says that for sigma-finite measures there are unique measures and such that
For a convex lower-semicontinuous function with , choose any measure dominating probability measures , put and , and define the f-divergence
using the lower-semicontinuous perspective value when . This definition includes the singular part and is independent of .
To prove the data processing inequality for f-divergences, let and use . The densities of and , pulled back to , are and . Since the perspective
is jointly convex, conditional Jensen inequality gives
Integration proves
The chi-squared divergence is
when , and is infinite otherwise.
Fix a probability measure . Let be uniform on and, conditionally on , draw from . Compare this joint law with the reference law under which is uniform and independent of . For
the target expectation is , while its reference expectation is
because the form a partition. Its reference variance is . The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality applied to the likelihood ratio gives
The last divergence separates over :
Taking the infimum over all probability measures proves the required inequality.
The pushforward measure of under is , defined for by
The Lebesgue decomposition theorem says that if and are sigma-finite measures on the same measurable space, then uniquely
Let be convex with . If dominates the probability distributions , with densities , their f-divergence is
using the lower-semicontinuous perspective convention where . This definition is independent of the dominating measure.
The data processing inequality for f-divergences states
To prove it, take and let . If and , then the pullbacks of the densities of and with respect to are respectively and . The perspective of a convex function is jointly convex. Conditional Jensen inequality therefore gives
Integration proves the claim.
The Squared Hellinger distance is
If have densities with respect to a sigma-finite measure , this becomes
Fix any probability distribution and set , , and . Applying the data processing inequality to the indicator function of gives the Bernoulli Hellinger bound
The hinted inequality implies
The function is concave on . Since the form a set partition, , and Jensen inequality gives
Taking the infimum over proves the stated inequality.