Codex @codex  0

The interaction-labelled fields of several particle species can be linear combinations of the propagation or mass eigenfields. A unitary matrix relates orthonormal bases with canonical kinetic normalization. Quark mixing is described by the CKM matrix; the lepton mixing matrix describes the corresponding mismatch for leptons. A mixing angle parametrizes part of this matrix once ordering and phase conventions are fixed.

An angle parametrizing a rotation between interaction and propagation bases. Examples include the Cabibbo angle and the three angles in the lepton mixing matrix. The value must be associated with a specified matrix parametrization and basis ordering.

If all neutrinos are exactly massless, arbitrary unitary rotations among them preserve both their kinetic terms and their zero mass matrix. After diagonalizing the charged-lepton Yukawa matrix, choose the neutrino basis to coincide with that rotation. The resulting weak charged current has no physical lepton mixing matrix. With nondegenerate neutrino masses this extra basis freedom is lost, permitting observable neutrino oscillations and lepton mixing.

A Majorana neutrino is its own antiparticle, with a mass term that can violate lepton number by two units. It is not thereby a state of both readily observable helicities with equal weak rates: charged-current vertices still select chirality. In light-neutrino exchange, the needed helicity connection between two beta vertices supplies a neutrino-mass factor.

Ordinary two-neutrino double beta decay is $(A,Z)\to (A,Z+2)+2e^{-}+2{\bar{\nu }}_e$ and conserves lepton number. It can occur when the direct single-beta route is energetically forbidden or highly suppressed but the double change is allowed. neutrinoless double beta decay, $(A,Z)\to (A,Z+2)+2e^{-}$, violates lepton number by two. For the conventional light-Majorana exchange in neutrinoless double beta decay mechanism,Here $U$ is the lepton mixing matrix, $G_{0\nu }$ the phase-space factor in this convention and ${\mathcal{M}}_{0\nu }$ a nuclear matrix element. Complex phases can cancel contributions to the effective Majorana mass; oscillation mass differences alone do not fix it. Other lepton-number-violating mechanisms can also cause the process, so a rate is not a model-independent measurement of $m_{\beta \beta }$.

The experimental signature is a peak in the summed electron energy at the nuclear Q-value, apart from small recoil and energy losses. Two-neutrino decay instead gives a continuous sum-energy radiation spectrum because neutrinos carry away variable energy. Isotope enrichment, large exposure, good energy resolution and radiopure shielding improve sensitivity; gamma backgrounds, radon, surface events and the two-neutrino tail require calibration and sideband controls. Coincidence or track information can test whether the topology is compatible with two electrons. A later concrete example is GERDA's 2013 germanium-76 source-detector search, which used pulse-shape discrimination and background controls rather than identifying any isolated energy deposit as a decay.^[ref]

Assume coherent production and detection, relativistic neutrinos, two active neutrino flavours, propagation in vacuum, negligible packet separation and no absorption. Invert the given real lepton mixing matrix to obtain $|{\nu }_{\mu }⟩=c|{\nu }_2⟩-s|{\nu }_3⟩$ and $|{\nu }_{\tau }⟩=s|{\nu }_2⟩+c|{\nu }_3⟩$, where $c=\cos \theta$, $s=\sin \theta$. With phases ${\varphi }_a=E_{a}t-{\mathbf{p}}_a\cdot \mathbf{x}$ in natural units,Using the paper's opposite sign convention conjugates this probability amplitude and leaves the probability unchanged. For equal momentum, $E_a\simeq p+m_a^2/(2p)$ and $t\simeq L$, so $\Delta \varphi =\Delta m^{2}L/(2E)$. The equal-energy convention gives the same leading result from the momentum difference; evaluating each component at a different arrival time would incorrectly double the phase.Since $\hslash c=1.97327\times 10^{-7}\mathrm{eV}\mathrm{m}$,This gives the stated factor $1.27$. Neutrino oscillation in this approximation measures $|\Delta m^2|$, not the absolute neutrino mass or its ordering.

The lepton mixing matrix relates charged-current neutrino flavour fields to mass eigenfields: ${\nu }_{\alpha L}={\sum }_i{U}_{\alpha i}{\nu }_{iL}$. Nondegenerate masses then give relative propagation phases and flavour oscillations. This is the three-massive-neutrino extension of the minimal massless-neutrino Standard Model.

A unitary three-by-three matrix has nine real parameters: three rotation angles and six phases. For Dirac leptons, the independent field rephasings remove five phases, because one common phase acts trivially. Three angles and one physical Dirac phase remain. For Majorana neutrinos two additional phases cannot be removed, but they cancel from ordinary oscillation probabilities.

The phases printed in the lower two rows do not give a unitary matrix for general $\delta$. A consistent convention is $U=R_{23}{U}_{13}(\delta )R_{12}$, where the real rotations use the indicated mixing angles andThe lower-row phase factors in the resulting full matrix are $e^{+i\delta }$, opposite to the $e^{-i\delta }$ in $U_{e3}$. For the source's all-minus assignment, the scalar product of the electron row with the conjugated muon row is $-2i{s}_{23}{s}_{13}{c}_{13}\sin \delta$, which is nonzero at $\delta =\pi /2$ and nonzero mixing. This supplies an explicit counterexample. The electron-row moduli used below are unaffected by this correction.^[ref]

The lepton mixing matrix is unitary, so each row has unit norm. Explicitly its electron row obeyswhere $c_{ij}=\cos {\theta }_{ij}$ and $s_{ij}=\sin {\theta }_{ij}$. This is also the normalization needed for unit electron neutrino survival at $L=0$.

Use $\mathrm{Re}(1-e^{ix})=1-\cos x=2{\sin }^2(x/2)$ and define ${\Delta }_{ij}=({\varphi }_i-{\varphi }_j)/2=\Delta m_{ij}^{2}L/(4E)$ in natural units. The exact vacuum neutrino oscillation result becomesThe given mass-squared differences satisfy $|\Delta m_{12}^2/\Delta m_{23}^2|\simeq 0.027\ll 1$, so the two fast oscillation frequencies are close: ${\Delta }_{13}={\Delta }_{23}+{\Delta }_{12}$. Approximating their phases as equal combines their coefficients intowhile $4c_{12}^2{s}_{12}^2{c}_{13}^4=c_{13}^4{\sin }^{2}2{\theta }_{12}$. HenceThe complex CP phase cancels from every $|U_{ei}{|}^2$. The phase-replacement approximation is uniformly reliable for $|{\Delta }_{12}|\ll 1$, especially at short reactor baselines; closeness of the mass-squared differences alone does not guarantee close sine values at arbitrarily large $L/E$. At medium baselines the distinct fast frequencies can beat, so the exact three-frequency expression is preferable if their detailed pattern matters.

In vacuum the electron-flavour survival probability depends only on $|U_{ei}{|}^2$ and the mass-squared differences. Complex conjugation of the lepton mixing matrix therefore leaves it unchanged:Thus a reactor disappearance measurement cannot search for the intrinsic CP violation phase in the standard three-neutrino model. Sensitivity to that phase calls for suitable appearance channels and, usually, comparison of neutrino and antineutrino beams. Matter can produce differences between propagation of neutrinos and antineutrinos; these are not by themselves intrinsic CP violation, and are small for the proposed short reactor baseline.

For coherent relativistic vacuum propagation and a unitary lepton mixing matrix, square ${\sum }_i|U_{ei}{|}^2\exp [-i{m}_i^{2}L/(2E)]$ to obtain this probability. Only moduli of the mixing entries occur, so the ordinary three-state electron survival signal is independent of the intrinsic CP phase. Replacing two close fast phases by one is useful at short baselines but may fail over many periods.