In a telescoping local-shell decomposition, split the spectral filter integral at a time proportional to the shell distance. A Lieb-Robinson bound controls short times, while the two-sided almost-exponential spectral filter tail controls long times. Polynomial shell-weight growth then gives the displayed decay. The estimate is asymptotic at large distance; small shells retain the elementary operator-norm bound. The evenization of a nonnegative bandlimited filter can supply the two-sided tail from a one-sided existence statement.
Undo a short evolution of two orthogonal locally indistinguishable states. Orthogonality is preserved exactly. A Lieb-Robinson bound localizes every backward-evolved observable within an expanded region and bounds its norm error. After normalizing the approximate observable, the initial expectation difference is at most . Polynomial volume growth in the system diameter controls the localization prefactor and yields preservation for sufficiently small linear-time coefficient.
A Duhamel comparison can bound truncation error using commutators evolved under the full Hamiltonian. This avoids assuming that a black-box Lieb-Robinson bound for also holds for every truncation. Polynomial shell weights and exponential distance suppression make the sum over omitted shells convergent. Comparing two truncations through the full evolution bounds their difference.
Lieb-Robinson interaction-chain expansion 2026-10-06
Iterating the integral commutator inequality gives ordered interaction chains with factors . A per-site interaction weight at most bounds each successive chain extension by . No chain shorter than the interaction distance connects separated supports. Reversing chains supplies the smaller support prefactor, producing the Lieb-Robinson bound. Overlapping supports require retaining the equal-time commutator term.
Lieb-Robinson localization by Haar twirling 2026-10-06
Apply Haar twirling conditional expectation to the complement of a neighbourhood around the initial operator support. A Lieb-Robinson bound on commutators with arbitrary complement-supported unitaries then bounds the approximation error without summing over sites. For a bound proportional to , choosing gives an error at most outside radius .
Operator support 2026-10-06
The operator support is the set of subsystems on which an operator may act nontrivially; it acts as the identity outside that set. Unitary time evolution can enlarge the support, while a Lieb-Robinson bound controls the error of replacing the evolved operator by one with smaller support. The support diameter and the number of sites in the support are different quantities.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2014 iii Paper 63 3 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
First take disjoint supports , the setting in which the displayed Lieb-Robinson bound can hold with an factor. For overlapping supports a nonzero equal-time commutator is possible, whereas that factor vanishes at .
Iterate the given integral inequality for . At time zero, if misses , and in general . Define the positive interaction-chain weightsThe Lieb-Robinson interaction-chain expansion givesThe ordered time integrations produce . For a finite system the iterative remainder tends to zero, since the total interaction weights are finite and the factorial dominates repeated integrations.
For the interaction distance convention counting the fewest interacting hyperedges needed to connect disjoint supports, when . The per-site interaction bound givesDropping the final endpoint restriction consequently bounds . Reversing the chains gives the same estimate with . ThereforeMultiply by and sum the exponential series to obtainFor overlapping supports, retain the initial term. A valid general version adds to the right side. A coarser bound with in place of is also sufficient for later shell estimates, with the conventional support distance zero on overlaps. Thus the printed bound needs disjoint supports or an equal-time term. The printed and inside a supremum over are also inconsistent labels; the iteration uses and .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2014 iii Paper 63 3 b ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Write the final topological quantum order constants as and , to avoid confusing the allowed support diameter with the small time coefficient. For any initial operator of operator norm at most one,and similarly for the partner state. The minus sign follows from and the Heisenberg picture convention . The Lieb-Robinson bound and its localization corollary apply to either time direction, using .
Choose , with , and localization buffer . The enlarged support obeysThe Lieb-Robinson localization by Haar twirling corollary supplies an operator approximating withDo not assume that the approximate operator has norm at most one: it only has . Apply final-state local indistinguishability to . The two approximation errors then giveIf the lattice has polynomially many sites in its diameter, , the error tends to zero uniformly in these supports. For sufficiently large , take . The initial pair is then indistinguishable within on supports of diameter at most . Together with the exact orthogonality from condition (i), this proves the initial state is topologically ordered for sufficiently small linear-time coefficient. The constants for initial and final order need not be identical.
The backward preservation of local indistinguishability has an explicit finite-system qualification: it holds whenever the displayed error is small enough. The conventional bounded-density, fixed-dimensional lattice interpretation supplies that condition. The question leaves growth control implicit; for an arbitrary collection of qudits one cannot discard the prefactor merely because is large. This identifies exactly the assumption needed by the supplied localization proof.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2014 iii Paper 63 4 d Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Put . For , apply a valid Lieb-Robinson bound to each commutator in the supplied comparison of the two evolutions. For a disjoint shell at support distance ,In the usual uniform interaction-norm setting, truncation preserves the strength bound, so the same constants apply to . The given polynomial shell-weight hypothesis and now giveConsequentlyThe question explicitly supplies a bound for the full ; such a bound alone should not be assumed to transfer to . A full-evolution comparison for truncated dynamics avoids that additional assumption. The Duhamel comparison formula givesNow use only the full-Hamiltonian bound, and sum the shell weights. Since , the errors for and are each bounded by . The triangle inequality comparing both evolutions to proves the same boxed estimate from the stated full-system assumption. Negative times follow by the reverse-time Duhamel formula; the commutator bounds use .
For the interaction-term shells used to enforce , shell corresponds to support distance for distinct terms. Replace the displayed commutator estimate by the coarser bound with , retaining the equal-time contribution for overlaps. Its distance factor is , and the fixed factor is absorbed by the big-O constant. This supplies the same claimed shell estimate without incorrectly using a zero equal-time bound for overlapping terms.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 67 1 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Let and be its complement, with Hilbert-space dimension . Use Haar twirling conditional expectation to defineThis is an operator supported on . The normalization is essential: the partial trace alone would not fix an operator already supported on .
Subtract the integrand from and use the operator norm triangle inequality. Since and every unitary operator has norm one, the assumed Lieb-Robinson bound, applied to a unitary supported on the entire complement, givesThe factor was bounded by ; there is no sum over sites and hence no volume-dependent prefactor.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2024 iii Paper 343 3 a Solution 2026-09-28
Letwhere the two signs describe the Heisenberg antiferromagnet and Heisenberg ferromagnet. A standard Lieb-Robinson bound is obtained by iterating the Heisenberg picture equation and bounding nested commutators by operator norms. Its constants depend on the interaction only through quantities such asChanging to changes neither the supports nor the norms . Every term in the nested-commutator estimate acquires at most an irrelevant sign before its absolute value is taken. Therefore both chains obey exactly the same estimatewith the same , and Lieb-Robinson velocity . No unitary equivalence of the two Hamiltonians is required.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2024 iii Paper 343 3 b Solution 2026-09-28
Consider a depth- circuit whose gates have range at most . Under backward Heisenberg evolution, a one-site observable has a backward light cone of a local quantum circuit of radius at most . Choose sites separated by . Their two backward light cones are disjoint. Since the input is a product state, expectations factorize, and hence every connected correlation function between the two output observables vanishes.
For the GHZ statehowever,at every separation. The light cones must therefore overlap, which forcesFor opposite ends of a one-dimensional chain, , so and no constant-depth local circuit can prepare the GHZ state. The continuous-time version follows directly from the Lieb-Robinson bound, with preparation time at least up to exponentially small tails.
This is the GHZ-state circuit-depth lower bound. Finite-depth local circuits define equivalence within a gapped phase, so a state with this long-range order cannot lie in the same circuit phase as a product state. The GHZ state is the finite-size cat state associated with spontaneous symmetry breaking; it is not a unique short-range-entangled ground state. The persistent distant correlation is precisely the obstruction.