A measurement result comprises the values attributed to a measurand together with the information needed to interpret those values. It commonly takes the form of a measured quantity value and its measurement uncertainty, but the result can contain a fuller probability distribution. A displayed number alone need not supply this information.[ref]
For an original electrical resistance example, report a corrected value at , with standard uncertainty . Specify that the uncertainty is a standard uncertainty, identify the resistor and the temperature condition, and retain the measurement procedure and measurement calibration records. Writing only “100.020” omits both the unit and the meaning of the last digits. Writing without stating what the second number represents is also incomplete.
An alternative report might use expanded uncertainty with coverage factor . This is a different uncertainty convention for the same central estimate; it is not a newly observed change in the resistor. A probability interpretation requires the distributional assumptions accompanying that convention.
An instrument's indication, a corrected measured quantity value and the complete measurement result therefore play different roles. Corrections from the measurement model, the specified measurand, environmental conditions and metrological traceability can all matter when comparing results. Extra displayed digits cannot replace the omitted measurement uncertainty.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.