Mertens bound from a log-integrable Chebyshev error Created 2026-10-07 Updated 2026-10-14
Suppose and . The Möbius divisor-sum identity gives . The exact Dirichlet convolution identity then gives , because its error is a convergent dyadic harmonic sum. Since , the displayed Mertens function bound follows. The classical Prime number theorem error meets the summability condition. This is a deduction from the Chebyshev error itself, without a separate estimate for the reciprocal zeta function.
Write and let be the Identity for Dirichlet convolution. The Möbius function uses the empty-product convention ; the Von Mangoldt function has . We first establish all the arithmetic function identities needed below. Every integer divisor of contributes one to , so . If has distinct prime factors, the squarefree divisors correspond to their subsets and
At the sum is one. Thus . Writing , the only divisors with nonzero Von Mangoldt function are , and hence
The Dirichlet convolution is commutative by replacing with , and associative because either bracketing sums over . Consequently
These are consequences of the definitions, rather than unproved invocations of Möbius inversion.
To identify the constant, integrate on each interval :
The tail is , since the integrand is at most for . Summation therefore gives , where is the harmonic number, and . Thus this is Euler's constant.
Put . Counting pairs of positive integers whose product is at most , and subtracting the square counted twice, gives the Dirichlet hyperbola method identity
Since , the harmonic number estimate yields
The increasing natural logarithm also satisfies by comparison with its integral. Subtracting proves
For the second implication, denote the Mertens function by and the Second Chebyshev function by . Apply the proved Dirichlet convolution identities to :
Summing this identity over integers up to gives the exact relation
Fix an integer . The contribution to from has absolute value at most
For , group by . This gives exactly
under the assumed cancellation ; extending that assumption from integers to real uses . Therefore . Letting proves the prime number asymptotic from Mertens cancellation:
Let be the Möbius function. Its Möbius divisor-sum identity is
Indeed, for the sum is the expansion of ; nonsquarefree divisors contribute zero. Thus, for arithmetic functions ,
To prove Möbius inversion, substitute the first formula into the second and collect the coefficient of . It is , which is one for and zero otherwise. Conversely the same divisor interchange recovers from the displayed formula for . In Dirichlet convolution notation this is simply , where is supported at one.
The Prime number theorem with classical zero-free-region error states that some absolute satisfies
Here is the Von Mangoldt function. An equivalent prime-counting form, after decreasing if needed, is . The contributions of proper prime powers are and can be absorbed into this error. We use to keep it distinct from the Fourier transform appearing in Question 5.
Here is a direct deduction of the requested Mertens bound from a log-integrable Chebyshev error from the stated Prime number theorem. First, the divisor identity gives
Second, the exact Dirichlet convolution identity
follows from : multiplication of a Dirichlet convolution by differentiates its two factors, so applying it to and convolving again with gives this formula. Summing it yields
The last harmonic sum is . To see this without an endpoint approximation, split into dyadic ranges . In each range , and its exponential factor is at most . Their sum over converges. The finitely many terms with obey the same estimate after adjusting the constant in the prime-number-theorem error. Therefore
For the Mertens function ,
The second sum has absolute value at most , by an integral comparison or the Stirling formula. Consequently
The absolute value in this conclusion is present in the original PDF.
Let be the Mertens function. Partial summation gives
For any , choose a sufficiently small with . The assumed bound makes the boundary term tend to zero and makes the integral absolutely convergent. Moreover, on each compact set of this half-plane, one can choose the same , so the integral has locally uniform convergence. Hence
is a holomorphic function on , agreeing with the reciprocal Dirichlet series from part (b) on .
The identity theorem applied to the holomorphic functions and extends their equality throughout ; the assumed simple pole makes the first function holomorphic at . Thus away from , proving a zero-free half-plane:
To obtain the strongest symmetric conclusion, use the following basic facts explicitly: the functional equation of the Riemann zeta function gives the entire function with , and the trivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function are the negative even integers. Every Nontrivial zero of the Riemann zeta function is therefore accompanied by its reflection . A Nontrivial zero of the Riemann zeta function with real part below would reflect to one above , which is impossible. Consequently all nontrivial zeros lie in the closed strip
The in the hypothesis prevents this argument from excluding either boundary line; the trivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function remain present.
The truncated Perron formula says that, for and ,
where an endpoint has half weight and the error is controlled by
Apply this with , , and
Part (b) makes the integrand . Move the contour to
using a contour that stays inside the zero-free region of the Riemann zeta function near small . The estimates supplied in the question give on the new contour. Its vertical segment is therefore
after decreasing . The horizontal segments and the Perron truncation error are
No residue is crossed because has a zero, rather than a pole, at . Thus the Mertens function satisfies
for some absolute .
Write for the Mertens function. Suppose, to the contrary, that for some the quotient were bounded. Partial summation would then make
converge and define a holomorphic function throughout . In the Euler product identifies this function with , so analytic continuation would make holomorphic in that larger half-plane.
By assumption, has a nontrivial zero. The functional equation of the Riemann zeta function reflects one of that zero and its partner into , where must have a pole, a contradiction. Thus is unbounded, which gives an exceeding any prescribed constant .
Let . The Möbius divisor-sum identity and the Von Mangoldt divisor identity give and , so
Here is Dirichlet convolution. The divisor summatory asymptotic bounds the terms with in absolute value by . For , group by : the remaining sum is . First let tend to infinity, then tend to infinity. This proves the Second Chebyshev function asymptotic from cancellation of the Mertens function.