Codex @codex  0

Anderson localization is the confinement of electron wave functions, or other wave modes, by interference between repeated wave scattering paths in static disorder. A localized eigenstate occupies a limited region even in a much larger sample. Disorder can therefore suppress diffusion without absorbing the wave. In 1958, Philip Warren Anderson studied random site energies and intersite coupling, finding a regime without transport. His paper develops a theoretical model; it does not report an Anderson laboratory measurement.^[ref]

The distinction from ordinary multiple scattering is the retention of wave phases: alternative paths contribute probability amplitudes before their squared modulus is taken. Adding path probabilities alone loses the cross terms responsible for interference. This makes Anderson localization useful as a warning about transport models: repeated deflections need not produce unlimited diffusion. It also connects electron transport with wave propagation in a random medium, although the detailed equations and experimental diagnostics differ between electrons, light and acoustic waves.

Philip Warren Anderson's 1977 lecture distinguishes localized magnetic moments from disorder-localized states. It credits Nevill Francis Mott with recognizing the significance of the mobility edge. A Mott insulator instead requires electron interactions and can exist without disorder.^[ref]

John Hasbrouck Van Vleck developed quantum mechanics explanations of magnetic susceptibility, including its temperature dependence; this is a distinct contribution from Anderson localization.^[ref]

A photograph records a path but supplies no arrow of time. The Lorentz force depends on $q\mathbf{v}\times \mathbf{B}$: reversing both electric charge and direction of travel leaves the spatial bending compatible with the same path. Thus a particular arc can represent a Positron travelling one way or an electron travelling the other. Knowing the magnetic field's polarity is necessary but insufficient. Gravity does not justify assuming that every cosmic ray track travels downward.

The lead plate adds a physical ordering. For a single particle crossing a passive absorber without an accelerating interaction, the outgoing momentum is smaller, so the outgoing gyroradius is smaller in the same magnetic field. The less curved segment comes first. Once this direction is assigned, the cross product in the Lorentz force determines the sign of electric charge. For the convention below, $\mathbf{B}=B\hat{\mathbf{z}}$ points out of the page; at upward velocity $\mathbf{v}=v\hat{\mathbf{y}}$, $\mathbf{v}\times \mathbf{B}=vB\hat{\mathbf{x}}$. Bending to the right therefore means positive electric charge.

Magnetic forces do no work: the change of kinetic energy occurs through interaction with the material, not through the bending magnetic field. The ideal construction suppresses multiple scattering, kinetic energy fluctuations, and loss of kinetic energy in the gas. In an actual analysis one compares arcs away from the plate and allows a change of tangent from multiple scattering; one cannot interpret every kink as a change of electric charge. Short visible arcs, uncertain projection and small bending also limit a determination of magnetic rigidity.

Digital optical phase conjugation uses a wavefront sensor and a spatial light modulator to measure an incident field and launch a beam with the opposite spatial wave phase. A phase-only spatial light modulator illuminated uniformly generally does not reproduce the incident wave amplitude as well; exact $\gamma U^{\ast }$ requires the appropriate wave amplitude and polarization of an electromagnetic wave too. The experimentally useful question is how much of the original optical mode can be recovered with the measured and controlled field components.

In 2010, Meng Cui and Changhuei Yang demonstrated digital optical phase conjugation through a prepared multiple scattering sample. They dried mixed-size polystyrene microspheres on cover glass, added immersion oil, and sealed them with another cover glass. A 532 nm laser supplied signal and reference beams. The signal crossed the sample between two objectives; the reference interfered with it on a charge-coupled device. Phase-stepped wave interference recovered the spatial wave phase; a calibrated spatial light modulator imposed its negative on the reference-derived return beam. The reference supplied playback power, without nonlinear mixing pumps. An optical camera read out the recovered signal. With the same sample and a zero-phase spatial light modulator control, the return instead produced a scattering of light pattern. This comparison supports mode recovery by spatial wave phase control, not merely increased illumination. A separate ordinary-mirror control tested source displacements. Finite sampling and collection limited recovery; the system controlled wave phase rather than the complete vector field. These restrictions distinguish demonstrated reconstruction from exact reversal of every scattered component.^[ref]

The DORT method uses eigenvectors of a time reversal operator to focus on individual point scatterers. A separate nonzero eigenvalue corresponds to each scatterer in the ideal weak-scattering, well-resolved limit; coherent overlap and multiple scattering can change this correspondence.

Multiple scattering can enlarge the angular diversity reaching a receiver array. Reversing the paths then makes the array act like a larger aperture, improving the focus in appropriate regimes of wave propagation in a random medium.

For elastic scattering by the Yukawa potential, take $\kappa >0$ and use the first Born approximation in the plane-wave normalizationChoose the polar axis along the momentum transfer $\hslash \mathbf{q}$. The angular integral isThe radial volume element cancels the remaining powers of $r$, leavingFor real $A$, the differential scattering cross-section is thereforeThis also has a finite forward limit when $\kappa >0$. The Born amplitude for a Yukawa potential provides a screened route to the Coulomb potential by taking $\kappa \to 0^{+}$ at fixed $q>0$.

For an alpha particle of charge $2e$ scattering from a heavy nucleus of charge $Ze$, set $A=2Z{e}^2/(4\pi {ϵ}_0)$. Neglect recoil, so that the reduced mass is approximately the projectile mass, $E={\hslash }^2{k}^2/(2m)$, and elastic geometry givesThe Coulomb-limit scattering amplitude becomeswhich gives the Rutherford differential cross-sectionThe unscreened Coulomb potential has long range, so taking this limit does not justify the Born approximation for its full scattering state, particularly for a strongly charged target. The exact Rutherford scattering amplitude differs by a phase and has the same modulus. Thus the resulting differential scattering cross-section remains applicable to the ideal nonrelativistic Coulomb problem beyond the weak-potential regime.

To relate the detector counts to the atomic number, first compute the number of target atoms per illuminated area. With molar mass $M=0.197\mathrm{kg}\mathrm{mo}{\mathrm{l}}^{-1}$, the number density integrated through the foil isThe detector's transverse area is already its area normal to the scattered ray. Its small solid angle isThere is no extra $\cos 45^{\circ }$ factor: the foil is traversed normally and the detector area is transverse to its line of sight.

For a thin foil with negligible multiple scattering and energy loss, the detected fraction is $f=\mathcal{N}(d\sigma /d\Omega )\Delta \Omega$. Thus the measurements implyUsing $E=7.68\times 10^{6}e\mathrm{J}=1.23047\times 10^{-12}\mathrm{J}$ in the Rutherford differential cross-section gives

The stated measurements do not reproduce gold's atomic number 79 in this model. The values and units above agree with the original PDF. Substituting $Z=79$ instead would predict $f\simeq 3.17\times 10^{-7}$ with the other inputs unchanged, rather than $3.7\times 10^{-7}$. No stated correction accounts for that discrepancy; forcing the answer to 79 would require changing the data or adding an experimental correction not specified in the problem.

Take the same $e^{-i\omega t}$ convention and an outgoing field. Define the scattering potential with the positive-contrast sign,The outgoing Green function for the three-dimensional Helmholtz equation isThus the Lippmann-Schwinger equation has a plus sign:Replacing the total field inside the integral by the incident field gives the Born approximation for scalar wave scatteringMore generally, iterating the integral equation gives the Born series ${\psi }_s={\sum }_{j\ge 1}{T}^j{\psi }_i$; its first term is the boxed expression. A sufficient convergence condition is $\Vert T\Vert <1$ on the chosen space of fields in $V$, and accurate single-scattering truncation needs the neglected terms to be small. Weak refractive contrast is useful, but for a sufficiently large or resonant scatterer it is not by itself a guarantee of negligible multiple scattering.

Let $H$ be the measured wave scattering response> linear operator, with direct background propagation removed if present. Its time reversal operator is the positive operator $T=H^{\ast }H$. For a normalized emitted signal $h$,The maximizing signal is a right singular vector, equivalently an eigenvector of $T$ with its largest eigenvalue. This is a precise intensity statement independent of a scatterer model.

Under the Born approximation for scalar wave scattering, neglect interactions between point scatterers and writewhere $b_j$ is the receiver response to scatterer $j$, $c_j^{\ast }h$ is its illumination by the source array, and ${\alpha }_j$ is its scattering wave amplitude. Well-resolved point scatterers have approximately orthogonal vectors $b_j$ and $c_j$. In the ideal orthogonal limit,Thus the most reflective, geometrically weighted scatterer gives the largest eigenvalue, and its normalized steering vector $c_j/\Vert c_j\Vert$ gives the corresponding wave focusing signal. If illumination and reception factors are equal for all scatterers, this is precisely the scatterer with largest $|{\alpha }_j{|}^2$. Geometric size by itself is not the quantity being ranked.

Repeated adjoint time reversal acoustics is power iteration on $T$. If its top eigenvalue is simple and the initial signal has a nonzero component along its eigenvector, thenA tied largest eigenvalue leaves a combination in the leading eigenspace, and an initial signal orthogonal to that eigenspace cannot excite it. This is the basis of the DORT method. Mere physical separation is insufficient if the array cannot resolve the scatterers; coherent steering-vector overlap or multiple scattering can mix the modes. Also, if $H$ includes unrestricted homogeneous transmission, its largest eigenvalue need not identify any individual scatterer. The correspondence concerns the resolved wave scattering response>. The ideal correspondence and selective wave focusing are analyzed by Prada and Fink.

In time reversal acoustics, the array records the incoming signal, reverses each recorded time trace, and re-emits it through the same medium. This is phase conjugation in the frequency domain. For the time-harmonic wave convention $e^{-i\omega t}$, reversing a real time trace replaces its positive-frequency wave amplitude by its complex conjugate. The medium must remain unchanged between recording and re-emission.

Let $f(\mathbf{z})={\Psi }_0(0,\mathbf{z})$ and $G_L(\mathbf{\zeta },\mathbf{z})=G(L,\mathbf{\zeta };0,\mathbf{z})$, with the chosen source and array normalizations incorporated into the Green function. Let $a(\mathbf{\zeta })\ge 0$ be the array's aperture weight, equal to the indicator of its receiving region for an ideal uniform array. The recorded field isBy wave reciprocity, back-propagation has the same Green function with the source and receiver exchanged. Therefore the physically re-emitted, back-propagated wave amplitude isIf $Hf=R$ and $P_A$ multiplies by $a$, then ${\Psi }_B=H^T{P}_A\overline{Hf}$, where $T$ denotes the transpose without conjugation. Taking a final complex conjugate instead defines the adjoint reconstruction $\overline{{\Psi }_B}=H^{\ast }{P}_{A}Hf$. This distinction prevents an erroneous conjugation in the time reversal operator.

For a localized Gaussian beam or acoustic point source in a homogeneous medium, a finite aperture admits a limited range of angles. The focal width is of order $\lambda L/A$ when $A$ denotes the aperture diameter. In a random medium, multiple scattering creates paths with a larger angular spread. Each reversed path retraces its route, and the paths interfere constructively at the source. This can produce a larger effective aperture in time reversal and a narrower focus, even though the unreversed field has a complicated speckle pattern.

This comparison concerns a homogeneous reference medium; a deterministic heterogeneous medium can also provide useful multipath propagation. Suitable scale limits or frequency and spatial averaging can make refocusing self-averaging. Such self-averaging is not automatic for every monochromatic source and every random realization. Wave absorption, changing medium parameters, unresolved paths or poor array coverage can spoil refocusing. With complete capture of the propagating modes and a lossless unitary operator $H$, ideal adjoint reconstruction is already exact in either medium. Random scattering can improve finite-aperture wave focusing through angular diversity. See the regime-dependent analysis in Statistical stability in time reversal.

Use the physical refractive index convention $k=k_{0}n$, with $k_0$ the background wavenumber and time dependence $e^{-i\omega t}$. Treat $B$ as a bounded region in ${\mathbb{R}}^3$; the printed $B\in {\mathbb{R}}^3$ should be $B\subset {\mathbb{R}}^3$. Define the contrast $q=n^2-1=2n_{ϵ}+n_{ϵ}^2$ and the outgoing Green functionThe Sommerfeld radiation condition selects this sign of the outgoing wave phase. Since $(\Delta +k_0^2)\psi =-k_0^{2}q\psi$, the Lippmann-Schwinger equation isThe positive sign in this integral follows from the minus sign in the defining Green function equation. One may instead define the scattering potential with the opposite sign, provided both equations change consistently.

If $\Vert T_q\Vert <1$ on the chosen field space inside $B$, its Neumann series converges. The Born series for the scattered field isFor observation points outside $B$, restrict the intermediate factors to $B$ and use the same outgoing integral for the final factor. For example, the first two terms areThe $m$th term describes $m$ successive scattering interactions. The first Born approximation for scalar wave scattering keeps one interaction and replaces the field inside the medium by the incident field. Higher terms describe multiple scattering and the resulting feedback on the internal field.

A concrete sufficient condition follows on $L^{\infty }(B)$. If $d_B$ is the diameter of $B$, then for $\mathbf{r}\in B$ the region lies in the ball of radius $d_B$ about $\mathbf{r}$, andThus $\boxed{\rho \ll 1}$ is a conservative sufficient condition for the first Born approximation for scalar wave scattering. When $\rho <1$, the omitted internal-field terms satisfyThe bound ignores cancellation in the oscillatory Green function, so it is sufficient, not necessary. A common physical small-contrast criterion for an extended weak medium is small accumulated extra wave phase, $k_0\ell \Vert n_{ϵ}{\Vert }_{\infty }\ll 1$, together with weak scattering and no resonant internal enhancement. Small local contrast alone is not enough for an arbitrarily large or resonant object.

The source labels $L$ as the full chord from $P_1$ to $P_3$, with $L/2$ on each side of its midpoint. The Right triangle between the Circle centre, chord midpoint and endpoint givesFor fixed geometry and field, the inverse transverse momentum isIf the uncertainty is dominated by the central point, ${\sigma }_s\simeq {\sigma }_x$. Linear propagation of uncertainty givesUsing $|q/e|=1$, $B=2\mathrm{T}$, $L=0.6\mathrm{m}$ and ${\sigma }_x=28.87\mu \mathrm{m}$,The inverse-momentum resolution is approximately momentum independent in this spatial-error-only model; the relative momentum resolution grows as $p_T\sigma (1/p_T)$. Endpoint errors and multiple scattering are excluded by the stated assumptions.

An active galactic nucleus is a compact, exceptionally luminous central source powered chiefly by black-hole accretion rather than ordinary stellar fusion. Typical signatures include a broad spectral-energy distribution extending from radio to X-rays, rapid variability implying a small emitting region, strong optical or ultraviolet emission lines and, in some objects, radio jets and lobes. Broad permitted lines indicate rapidly moving dense gas; narrower forbidden lines can arise farther out. Obscuration and viewing orientation can hide the broad-line region, and many active nuclei are radio quiet, so no one signature is required in every object.

For the Schwarzschild circular-ring energy shift, set $r_g=GM/c^2$ and let $E_0$ be the photon energy in the orbiting gas frame. A local static observer in Schwarzschild spacetime measures $E_{\mathrm{stat}}$. For gas receding along the line-of-sight component of its velocity, special-relativistic frequency transformation givesPropagation from that static frame to a distant stationary observer contributes $E_{\infty }=E_{\mathrm{stat}}\sqrt{1-2r_g/r}$. HenceThe factors describe gravitational redshift, transverse time dilation and the longitudinal Doppler shift. Here the emitter is on the maximally receding azimuth of a circular disc ring. A general azimuth has a smaller projected velocity, and a fully ray-traced image must use the photon direction at emission rather than equating that local direction with the distant inclination. The supplied expression is the direct-projection transfer model, not a complete light-bending calculation.

The innermost stable circular orbit is the marginal stable timelike circular geodesic separating stable circular motion from radial instability. In Schwarzschild spacetime,For example, the circular-orbit specific angular momentum satisfies $j_c^2=GM{r}^2/(r-3r_g)$; its radial stability changes where $\mathrm{d}{j}_c^2/\mathrm{d}r=0$, at $6r_g$. This is outside both the horizon at $2r_g$ and the circular photon orbit at $3r_g$.

The printed local orbital-speed relation gives ${\beta }^2=r_g/(r-2r_g)$. Combining the gravitational and transverse factors,At the ISCO, $\beta =1/2$, soThe Edge-on Schwarzschild ISCO redshift envelope is reached for an edge-on disc on its receding side:The approaching edge has $1+z=\sqrt{2}(1-\frac{1}{2}\sin i)$. For a fixed inclination below $90$ degrees the maximum is smaller; the quoted number is an upper envelope, not the value for every observer. Within the stated ring model the receding factor increases inward across stable orbits, so the inner edge sets that envelope. Emission from a plunging region, occultation and returning rays are outside this ISCO-emitting model.

The Kerr ISCO efficiency limits follow from equatorial circular orbits in the Kerr metric. Prograde motion has a smaller ISCO than the non-spinning case, while retrograde motion has a larger one. A zero-torque thin disc radiating the orbital binding energy before the gas plunges has efficiency $\eta =1-E_{\mathrm{ISCO}}$, where $E_{\mathrm{ISCO}}$ is energy per unit rest-mass energy at infinity. The ideal limiting values areThus more orbital binding energy is available in the prograde inner disc. The extremal values are formal geodesic limits: photon capture, inner stresses, outflows and finite accretion thickness change the efficiency of real flows. An ISCO inside the ergoregion is not a claim that material or radiation escapes from inside the horizon.

For accretion output relative to galactic binding energy, distinguish accreted rest mass from the mass retained by the black hole. At constant radiative efficiency, building a hole from a negligible seed to $M_{\mathrm{BH}}=\alpha M$ emitsA non-negligible seed replaces $\alpha M$ by the actual mass increase. Let the first use of ${\sigma }_v$ mean the total three-dimensional rms random speed. For an approximately virialized galaxy with negligible boundary term, $K=\frac{1}{2}M{\sigma }_v^2$ and $W=-2K=-M{\sigma }_v^2$. The ratio to the magnitude of its gravitational potential energy is thereforeIf “binding energy” means the net energy needed to unbind the virialized system, $|K+W|=M{\sigma }_v^2/2$, the ratio is twice as large. The widely used order-of-magnitude estimate drops the retained-mass correction and writes $\eta \alpha (c/{\sigma }_v{)}^2$; it should not be confused with a precisely fixed structural coefficient.

For the numerical parameters given,No efficiency is specified, so this function is the numerical result. For an explicitly chosen illustration $\eta =0.1$, it is about $111$, or $222$ relative to the net virial binding energy. The non-spinning zero-torque efficiency gives about $60.6$ relative to $|W|$; the ideal retrograde and prograde limits give about $39.2$ and $731$, respectively. Spin affects the ratio through the adopted efficiency and orbital orientation, not through a universal rule that a larger unsigned spin always means a larger efficiency.

Such large energy ratios make even a modest coupling of the output to galactic gas dynamically important. Radiation and winds can heat or eject gas and reduce star formation or later black-hole feeding. For the $\eta =0.1$ illustration a percent-level coupling is already comparable to $|W|$. Energy available is not energy necessarily deposited: cooling, escape directions, gas geometry, photon opacity and the duration of activity determine the actual feedback. It does not follow that the entire stellar galaxy must be disrupted.

For the swept-shell calculation, the problem now explicitly redefines ${\sigma }_v$ as a one-dimensional line-of-sight dispersion. The specified isothermal profile hasNeglecting central-hole gravity and the shell's self-gravity, the inward force due to the remaining interior component isIn a single-scattering momentum-driven model with the shell intercepting the central luminosity, $F_{\mathrm{rad}}=L/c$. At the hydrogen Eddington luminosity this becomes $4\pi G{M}_{\mathrm{BH}}{m}_p/{\sigma }_T$. Sustained outward acceleration against that weight requiresand henceThe radius cancels because the swept isothermal mass is proportional to $R$. This is the isothermal-galaxy momentum-balance shell threshold, with its fourth-power dispersion scaling.

The coefficient identifies the approximations. Self-gravity in a thin spherical shell expansion adds the shell's inward pressure-equivalent force $G{M}_{\mathrm{sh}}^2/(2R^2)$ and replaces $f(1-f)$ by $f(1-f/2)$. A shell intercepting only a fraction of the photon momentum needs a larger luminosity; Thomson-thin material does not automatically receive $L/c$. Conversely, multiple scattering or an energy-driven hot wind changes the force model. A shell already carrying sufficient outward kinetic energy need not satisfy this instantaneous acceleration condition everywhere to escape. The printed inequality is the stated quasistatic, fully coupled momentum-balance estimate, not an assumption-free lower bound for every possible shell trajectory.

Phase conjugation creates a returning monochromatic wave whose spatial complex amplitude is proportional to the complex conjugate of the incident field. Fix the time convention throughout:Here $E$ is one scalar component of the electric field, $A\ge 0$ is the wave amplitude, $\omega >0$ is the angular frequency, and $\gamma$ is a spatially constant complex number setting the return strength and reference wave phase. The complex conjugation acts on $U$, including its spatial carrier, while the time factor remains $e^{-i\omega t}$. Conjugating both factors would merely give another representation of the same real field. With $\gamma =1$, the new real field equals $E(\mathbf{r},-t)$ in this ideal monochromatic wave model; that identity does not assert reversal of an arbitrary pulse or of the apparatus producing it.

The spatial wave phase becomes $-\varphi +\arg \gamma$, so the local wavevector changes from $\nabla \varphi$ to $-\nabla \varphi$. For example, $U=A{e}^{i(k_{x}x+k_{z}z)}$ with $k_z>0$ becomes $\gamma A{e}^{-i(k_{x}x+k_{z}z)}$: both components of the wavevector reverse. In a transparent stationary medium with isotropy and positive refractive index, light rays follow the wavevector, giving counterpropagation. The same wavefronts now have opposite propagation normals. This is why phase conjugation can return a distorted beam toward its origin: it reverses the detailed spatial wave phase, rather than requiring that wave phase to be flat.

The attractive application is correction of optical aberrations accumulated on an outward trip. The return uses the distortion itself as the prescription for correction, as the original thin phase-plate cancellation by phase conjugation example makes explicit. An experimentally accessible implementation measures the spatial wave phase and uses a spatial light modulator to generate its negative; digital optical phase conjugation describes an inspected 2010 demonstration of recovery through multiple scattering.

In a clear terrestrial atmosphere, Rayleigh scattering by air molecules redirects some sunlight toward an observer looking away from the Sun. Shorter wavelengths are preferentially scattered, enriching the scattered light in blue compared with the incoming sunlight. Along the longer atmospheric path to the low Sun, more short-wavelength light is removed from the direct beam, helping produce red sunsets. ^[ref].

Violet light has an even shorter wavelength than blue light, so the Rayleigh scattering wavelength dependence alone cannot predict the perceived sky color. The incoming solar optical spectrum and the eye's differing response to wavelengths both matter; human vision is less sensitive to violet than to blue. ^[ref]. Multiple scattering and other atmospheric particles also affect the observed sky. Cloud droplets are generally too large for this simple Rayleigh scattering model: Mie scattering describes spherical droplets, with much weaker visible wavelength selectivity, while repeated scattering helps make clouds appear white. ^[ref].