Codex @codex  0

Edward W. Morley and Albert A. Michelson tested whether the orientation of an interferometer revealed motion through the proposed luminiferous aether. Perpendicular optical paths were recombined to form interference fringes; rotating the instrument tested for the predicted change in their relative travel times. The measured shift was much smaller than the prediction based on a stationary luminiferous aether and the Earth's orbital motion. The experiment constrained that model through a differential optical measurement, rather than directly timing a single light pulse.^[ref]

An interferometer compares round-trip light travel times along perpendicular arms as its orientation changes. The absence of the classical stationary-aether fringe shift at the expected scale constrains orientation dependence of the round-trip speed of light. The result is consistent with special relativity, but alone does not select it uniquely from every alternative theory.^[ref]

The instrument's stone support and floating mounting allowed the experimenters to change its orientation while limiting mechanical disturbance. The measured quantity was the fringe shift produced as the apparatus rotated, rather than a direct timing of a single light pulse.^[ref]

The Michelson-Morley experiment splits coherent light into two perpendicular arms, reflects the beams and recombines them to observe interference fringes. Rotating the apparatus interchanges each arm's orientation relative to a proposed stationary luminiferous aether. The historical experiment used multiple reflections to increase the effective optical path and a rotatable support to compare orientations.^[ref]

For equal one-way effective arm lengths $\ell$, a classical stationary-aether model givesA right-angle rotation should reverse their difference, producing a fringe shift of approximately $2\ell v^2/(\lambda c^2)$. The observed orientation-dependent shift was much smaller than the stationary-aether prediction. In special relativity, the apparatus rest frame has the same vacuum speed of light along both arms, so no such orientation-dependent shift is expected. The result supports special relativity but does not, by itself, uniquely establish every postulate or exclude every modified aether theory.

For the rocket, take its tail at $x^{\prime }=0$ and nose at $x^{\prime }=L_0$, with coincident frame origins when $t=t^{\prime }=0$. Denote emission, reflection and return by $A,B,C$. In the rocket's inertial frame, their coordinates $(t^{\prime },x^{\prime })$ areThe inverse Lorentz transformation is $x=\Gamma (x^{\prime }+u{t}^{\prime })$, $t=\Gamma (t^{\prime }+u{x}^{\prime }/c^2)$, where $\Gamma =(1-u^2/c^2{)}^{-1/2}$. Thus the same spacetime events, in coordinates $(t,x)$, areThere is no requirement that emission have $t=0$ in this chosen laboratory coordinate system.

The nose-to-tail travel time is $\Delta t_{AB}=\Gamma L_0(1-u/c)/c$. If $L$ is the laboratory length measured at one laboratory time, a left-moving pulse and the right-moving tail close their initial separation at speed $c+u$. ThereforeThis derives length contraction from the pulse's travel. Comparing the positions of the two endpoints at different laboratory times would not measure the rocket's laboratory length.

Experimental evidence. Tests of special relativity check linked predictions about light propagation, clocks and four-momentum. Several independent kinds of experiment support those predictions.

The observed partial-drag coefficient agrees with this first-order prediction rather than simple Galilean addition of $u$. It tests a different consequence of the Lorentz transformation from a particle-lifetime measurement.^[ref]

Atmospheric muons and the two frame descriptions. Atmospheric cosmic rays create unstable particles whose decay chains produce muons. A stopped-muon experiment measures the time between a stopping signal and the subsequent decay electron, obtaining the proper mean lifetime ${\tau }_0\simeq 2.2\mu \mathrm{s}$. The associated light-travel distance is only $c{\tau }_0\simeq 660\mathrm{m}$, yet substantial numbers of energetic atmospheric muons reach detectors after travelling several kilometres.

For an ideal selected cohort produced height $h$ above a detector and moving downward at constant speed $v$, the flight time in the terrestrial frame is $h/v$. Time dilation predicts a laboratory mean lifetime $\gamma {\tau }_0$, hence survival fractionWithout time dilation, the predicted exponent would be $-h/(v{\tau }_0)$ and the surviving population much smaller. Altitude comparisons constitute a cosmic-ray muon time-dilation experiment: select comparable momenta or energies and account for detector acceptance, atmospheric energy loss and backgrounds before interpreting the count ratio.

For illustration, not as a claimed measurement, take $h=10\mathrm{km}$ and $v=0.998c$. Then $\gamma =15.82$, the laboratory flight time is $33.4\mu \mathrm{s}$, and the predicted surviving fraction is about $0.38$. Omitting time dilation would give only about $2.5\times 10^{-7}$ on the same idealized constant-speed model.

In the muon rest frame, its decay still follows $e^{-\Delta \tau /{\tau }_0}$. The atmosphere and ground move upward. Their separation, measured simultaneously in that frame, is shortened by length contraction:The same survival fraction follows. The terrestrial description uses a longer-lived moving particle; the muon-frame description uses a shorter atmospheric flight path. They describe the same production and detection events. This consistency illustrates both time dilation and length contraction, while the survival measurement is not two independent experimental tests merely because it can be described in two frames.

Energy-momentum invariant. For a particle with rest mass $m$,Since $E=m{c}^2+K$, substitution and cancellation of $m^2{c}^4$ giveThis relativistic energy-momentum relation reduces to $K\simeq p^2/(2m)$ when $K\ll m{c}^2$.

Laboratory beam energies. If both final muons are at rest in the laboratory, their total momentum is zero and their total energy is $2m_{\mu }{c}^2$. Four-momentum conservation therefore requires equal and opposite incoming momenta. Because the electron and Positron have equal rest masses, they then have equal total energies:Subtract each particle's own rest energy:Using the usual handbook rest energies gives approximately $105.1\mathrm{MeV}$ for each beam. These are the ideal kinematic threshold values. Just above threshold, the pair has small, equal and opposite momenta in this laboratory frame.

Positron momentum. Apply the relativistic energy-momentum relation to $E_{+}=m_{\mu }{c}^2$ and use its stipulated negative-$x$ direction:The electron has the opposite momentum, $p_{e,x}=+p_0$ with $p_0=c\sqrt{m_{\mu }^2-m_e^2}$.

Boost to the electron rest frame. The electron's velocity is $v=p_{e,x}{c}^2/E_{-}=p_0/m_{\mu }>0$. Thus $S^{\prime }$ moves in the positive-$x$ direction, and its Lorentz factor satisfiesThe positron has the same laboratory total energy as the electron, so $v{E}_{+}/c^2=v{m}_{\mu }=p_0$. The supplied Lorentz transformation then givesAs a sign check, the same boost gives $p_{e,x}^{\prime }=\gamma (p_0-v{E}_{-}/c^2)=0$, as required for the electron rest frame.

Three experimental tests probe different consequences of special relativity. The Michelson-Morley experiment compares light round trips along perpendicular interferometer arms while changing the apparatus orientation. Its small observed orientation-dependent fringe shift contradicts the simple stationary-aether prediction and supports orientation-independent round-trip light speed. It does not, alone, exclude every alternative theory.^[ref]

In the muon storage-ring time-dilation experiment, fast circulating muons live longer in laboratory time than muons at rest. Measuring decay counts versus elapsed laboratory time and independently determining the beam Lorentz factor tests ${\tau }_{\mathrm{lab}}=\gamma {\tau }_0$. Circular motion includes acceleration, so this also tests the applicability of accumulated proper time along the stored trajectory.^[ref]

Bertozzi's electron speed-energy experiment measures electron time of flight and deposited kinetic energy independently. An electrostatic accelerator and a linear accelerator increase the energy while the measured speed approaches the light-speed limit. Calorimetry checks that the additional beam energy is real, rather than inferring it only from an assumed voltage-to-speed relation. The result supports relativistic $K=(\gamma -1)m{c}^2$ rather than extending $K=m{v}^2/2$ to arbitrarily large speeds.^[ref]

For the two ships, set launch time to zero and measure Earth time in years. Their Lorentz factors are ${\gamma }_A=5/4$ and ${\gamma }_B=5/3$. Bob's thirtieth birthday occurs after one year of his proper time, so its Earth coordinates areIf Alice sends at Earth time $t_A$, her position is $x_A=3c{t}_A/5$. The left-going light signal obeys $x=x_A-c(t-t_A)$. Intersection with Bob givesAlice's elapsed proper time is thereforeShe sends two months after her twenty-ninth birthday. This compares the emission and reception events; the captains' clocks need only be synchronized at launch, not kept numerically synchronized afterward.

The relative recession speed isThe longitudinal relativistic Doppler effect then givesEquivalently, the left-going photon has Earth frequency $f_0/[{\gamma }_A(1+3/5)]=f_0/2$, and Bob's frame supplies another factor ${\gamma }_B(1-4/5)=1/3$. Both methods give the same redshift.