Order the index set of the open cover . For the sheaf of abelian groups , the Čech cochain group is
It is a product, not a finite-support sum. The Čech coboundary is
Every term in occurs twice with opposite signs, so . The Čech cohomology of the cover is . Refinements induce maps on these groups; different choices of refinement indices give maps related by a cochain homotopy, hence the same map on cohomology. Taking the direct limit over covers gives
One may use locally finite covers, since a complex manifold is a paracompact space and these covers are cofinal. In degree zero this recovers the group of global sections by the sheaf gluing axiom.
Let be a compact set of a Hausdorff space . For any and each , the Hausdorff property gives disjoint open sets and . The sets cover ; compactness supplies a finite subcover . The open set contains and misses every , hence misses . Thus is open, and every compact subset of a Hausdorff space is closed. The empty-set case is immediate.
Since with its usual topology is Hausdorff, its compact sets are closed. The open cover of has a finite subcover of any compact set . Taking the largest index in that subcover gives , so is a bounded set. This proves the required direction of the Heine-Borel theorem without assuming its converse.
The points of the spectrum of a commutative ring are its prime ideals. Its Zariski topology has closed sets and basis . The structure sheaf of a scheme can be defined as follows: a section over assigns an element of to every , and locally that assignment is represented by one fraction , with outside every prime in the neighbourhood. Restrictions forget values. Local representability and equality can be checked on an open cover, so these assignments satisfy the sheaf gluing axiom. On the sections identify with the localization of a ring .
Evaluation at induces the ring homomorphism . It is surjective because is represented by a section on . For injectivity, represent a germ by on a neighbourhood of . If its value in vanishes, there is with . The section is then zero after restricting to inside that neighbourhood. Its germ is zero. Thus
For the usual additive Čech cohomology groups, is understood to be a sheaf of abelian groups. Order the index set of the open cover . The Čech cochain group is
An empty intersection contributes the zero group. The Čech coboundary is the alternating sum of restriction maps:
Every double omission appears twice with opposite sign, so . The Čech cohomology is the cohomology of this cochain complex:
Here . The sheaf gluing axiom identifies with . This definition is for the fixed cover; no limit over refinements is part of the group requested here. Without the abelian-group structure, this additive Čech cochain complex is not defined.
Treat as the trivial group if is not abelian. The restriction maps satisfy the presheaf identities. To verify the sheaf gluing axiom, take an open cover of . If , every section group is trivial. If , at least one contains . Every two such opens have an overlap containing , so compatibility forces all their sections to have the same value . Opens not containing have their unique trivial section. The value is exactly the unique glued section. Thus the stated presheaf is a skyscraper sheaf, including for nonabelian groups.
For the stalk of a sheaf, take the direct limit over neighbourhoods of . If some neighbourhood of omits , neighbourhoods inside are cofinal and all their groups are trivial. If every neighbourhood of contains , every group in the system is and every transition map is the identity. Consequently, on the arbitrary topological space in the question,
Membership in this closure means exactly that every neighbourhood of contains . In particular . If is a closed point, the closure is just and the familiar point-supported answer results. The separation assumption is not present in the printed question, so it cannot be imposed silently.
Let , the sheaf of meromorphic principal parts. Exactness of taking stalks gives
Choose a holomorphic coordinate vanishing at . Every meromorphic germ has a finite negative tail in its Laurent series; the holomorphic tail vanishes in the quotient. Hence
This coordinate description is a vector-space identification; the intrinsic space is the quotient of germs, so a coordinate change need not preserve the displayed basis.
For each point inclusion , a principal part defines a local meromorphic germ near , whose quotient class is zero off . Gluing with zero on the complement gives a map from its skyscraper sheaf to . These maps induce an isomorphism on every stalk and therefore an isomorphism of sheaves:
The direct sum of sheaves means the sheafification of the sectionwise direct-sum presheaf. Its sections can have infinitely many nonzero components globally, but their point supports form a locally finite family of subsets. This matches the fact that poles of a meromorphic function are locally finite. On a compact Riemann surface only finitely many points can occur; on a noncompact one a discrete infinite family is allowed.
For a global principal-part family , choose local meromorphic lifts on a sufficiently small open cover. The differences are holomorphic functions and form a Čech cocycle. The connecting homomorphism sends to the resulting class in . If this class vanishes, after refining the cover write ; then the functions glue to a global meromorphic function. Conversely any global lift makes the class zero. Equivalently, exactness of the given long exact sequence in sheaf cohomology says
The connecting class is the obstruction to the Mittag-Leffler problem on a Riemann surface. It rules on the specified poles and their finite negative Laurent tails, with no additional poles allowed. When a solution exists, any two solutions differ by a global holomorphic function.
Let be an open cover of in its subspace topology. Write with each open in . Since is a closed set, is open, and is an open cover of the compact space . A finite subcover restricts to a finite subcover of . Hence the closed subset is compact.
If is an open cover of in its subspace topology, the inverse images under the restricted continuous map form an open cover of . Take a finite subcover; the corresponding cover . Thus the continuous image is compact. Neither argument assumes a Hausdorff space or asserts that a compact set must be closed set in an arbitrary topological space.
The labels (i) and (ii) in the original PDF are hypotheses of one theorem, not separate requests. Here is the finite-cover step furnished by the compact fibres. Start with any open cover of , with the open in (a relative cover can be lifted to one of this form). For each , compactness gives a finite set with
An empty fibre needs no cover elements: take and .
The complementary set is closed set. By the closed map hypothesis, its image is closed set, so
is open, contains , and satisfies . These open sets cover the compact set . Select finitely many, . The finitely many original cover elements with indices in then cover . Therefore
This proves the unheaded conclusion in the PDF as well as explaining the role of hypothesis (i). No Hausdorff assumption is needed for this compact-preimage theorem for closed maps.
For the sphere homology calculation use singular homology, homotopy invariance of homology, and the reduced Mayer–Vietoris sequence, not cellular homology. For a point, its chain group for singular homology is in every nonnegative degree, and its boundary operator is multiplication by , hence alternately zero and one in positive degrees. Its homology is therefore in degree zero and zero above. Singular chains of a disjoint union split into the summand chain complexes. Start with , the disjoint union of two points: , all positive groups vanish, and . For , remove the north and south poles to obtain an open cover of . Each member is contractible, while has a deformation retraction to , including the disconnected intersection when . The reduced exact sequence therefore supplies
Also is connected, so its reduced degree-zero group vanishes. Induction gives
The separate calculation avoids conflating its two degree-zero generators.
Choose an orientation of , with , and let be its fundamental class. The mapping degree is the integer determined by . To define the local degree at , set and require to be isolated in . Choose an open neighborhood containing no other point of that fiber. Then defines a map of pairs
The degree- relative homology groups on both sides are , by a manifold chart and excision. The local orientation of a manifold chooses their generators. The induced map multiplies these generators by an integer, denoted . Excision and naturality show independence of the choice of . Differentiability is unnecessary; if is smooth and is invertible, the inverse function theorem gives relative to the orientations. Without isolation in the fiber this pointwise definition need not apply.
For the degree as a sum of local degrees, assume has finite fiber . Disjoint coordinate neighborhoods and excision identify
The absolute fundamental class maps to the tuple of local orientation generators. Under the relative map induced by , the th generator goes to times the generator at , and the resulting map from the direct sum adds these contributions. On the other hand, naturality says that first applying the absolute map and then passing to the local group at gives times that generator. Thus
If the fiber is empty the sum is zero: the map factors through the contractible punctured sphere and has degree zero. If every point of a fiber is isolated, compactness makes that closed fiber finite, so the theorem applies. In particular, a regular value of a smooth map gives the signed count of its inverse images. For , define a mapping degree on the reduced generator : the identity has mapping degree one, the swap of the two points minus one, and either constant map zero. With local orientation signs positive at and negative at , the same sum formula holds. The connected-sphere convention above is the standard positive-dimensional one.
For any , the balls form an open cover of the compact metric space . Compactness supplies a finite subcover
This is exactly total boundedness.
Choose an open cover of by affine opens . Since is a quasi-compact topological space, finitely many suffice. Let be the restrictions of . Part (a) identifies with , whose ring of regular functions is the localization of a ring . The vanishing of there means
so for some . Taking at least as large as every gives on every member of the finite cover. The local identity axiom for the sheaf of rings therefore gives
For an ordered open cover and a sheaf of sets , the Čech cochain group is
Its Čech coboundary is
Terms in cancel in pairs. Hence
A compact space is a topological space in which every open cover has a finite subcover. A Hausdorff space is one in which every two distinct points have disjoint open neighbourhoods. A homeomorphism is a bijection that is continuous and whose inverse is continuous.
For an equivalence relation on , let be the set of equivalence classes and let
The quotient topology declares open exactly when is open in . It follows directly from the definition that is continuous.
Suppose that the continuous map is constant on equivalence classes. The only possible factorisation is
which is well-defined by the hypothesis and satisfies . For every open ,
is open in . The definition of the quotient topology therefore makes open, so is continuous. This proves the universal property of the quotient topology.
Prevariety 2026-10-05
In the classical convention over an algebraically closed field , a prevariety is an irreducible topological space with a sheaf of rings which has a finite open cover by affine varieties, with compatible local identifications. A prevariety need not be separated. A classical algebraic variety is a separated prevariety: its diagonal morphism has closed image. Some authors allow reducible prevarieties and varieties; the separation criterion and product construction remain the same under that convention.
Sheaf gluing axiom Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
The sheaf gluing axiom says that sections on an open cover that agree on every overlap glue to a unique section on .
Vanishing of quasi-coherent cohomology on an affine scheme Created 2026-10-05 Updated 2026-10-06
Every quasi-coherent sheaf on an affine scheme has zero higher sheaf cohomology. Together with the equivalence between modules and quasi-coherent sheaves on an affine scheme, this makes affine varieties the basic acyclic pieces for computing cohomology. An affine open cover of a separated scheme has affine finite intersections, so the acyclic cover theorem identifies its Čech cohomology with sheaf cohomology.