Use partial fraction decomposition:
Integrating the two logarithmic derivatives gives
This holds on each interval avoiding the two poles and , with an independent integration constant on each interval.
A repeated linear factor requires both reciprocal powers. Write the partial fraction decomposition as
Multiplication by the common denominator gives . Setting gives , and setting gives . Comparing the coefficients of then gives . Thus
Write the partial fraction decomposition as . After multiplying through, . Setting gives , and setting gives , so
For the partial fraction decomposition, write . Clearing denominators gives . Substitution at and yields and , hence
The repeated factor requires both a simple-pole and a double-pole term in the partial fraction decomposition. Write
Multiplying through gives . Substituting and gives and ; the quadratic coefficient then gives . Therefore
Since , write the partial fraction decomposition as . Matching the numerator gives and , hence
For , separate variables and use partial fraction decomposition:
Integration yields
On any connected solution interval, absorb the fixed signs into a real constant to write
The two real signs of the square root are chosen consistently on a branch where . The constant solutions of the reduced equation are . The original equation excludes the last two; is retained by for .
Use integration by substitution , so . The indefinite integral becomes . Its partial fraction decomposition is
Integrating gives . Hence
The formula applies on each interval where the printed integrand is defined: and . The constant of integration may differ between such intervals.
The stated derivative formula needs a domain qualification. The original PDF calls real, but the integral is even in ; its derivative therefore cannot equal the printed positive expression on both sides of zero.
First take . The improper integral converges, with an integrand near zero and decay at infinity. On compact positive parameter intervals, an integrable bound also justifies differentiation under the integral sign:
For , the partial fraction decomposition is
Integrating the rational functions gives
At , the same result follows by continuity, or directly from .
Integrating gives on the positive half-line. To fix , take : for the integrand is bounded by , an integrable function. The dominated convergence theorem gives , so . Evenness then extends the logarithmic parameter integral with Cauchy weight to its full stated domain:
For negative , the derivative is . At zero the right and left derivatives are and , so is not differentiable there. The pointwise derivative of the integrand at zero is zero, but interchanging it with the infinite integral at that parameter is invalid. Finally, substituting gives the requested special value
For integration by parts, take and . Then and , so
Use partial fraction decomposition . Therefore
The constant of integration may be chosen independently on the positive and negative intervals.
Use integration by substitution , . The bounds become and , and the remaining denominator factorizes as . The partial fraction decomposition is
Consequently the definite integral is
All logarithm arguments here are positive on the integration interval.
Multiply the partial fraction decomposition by to obtain a polynomial identity:
At , this gives . Comparing the coefficients of then gives , so
The remaining coefficients agree: and . The original rational identity is understood away from its poles and .
Over the complex numbers, the polynomial factorization gives the partial fraction decomposition
Multiplication by and comparison of polynomial coefficients give and . Hence
Use integration by substitution , . The denominator factorizes as , and partial fraction decomposition gives
Integrating and restoring yields
For real , both and are positive, so no absolute-value signs are needed in this real logarithm. The denominator never vanishes.
First suppose . Differentiation under the integral sign, justified on compact positive parameter intervals by an integrable bound, gives
The first integral is . For , use the partial fraction decomposition
The standard inverse tangent antiderivatives then give
The same value holds at by continuity, or by direct integration. Hence the proposed first-order linear differential equation is valid on the positive parameter range:
Divide by to recognise a quotient rule derivative:
To fix , the value alone is insufficient, since every displayed solution tends to zero there. Instead consider
This limit follows from the dominated convergence theorem: for and , the logarithm's absolute value is bounded by ; for , it is at most . After division by , these are integrable. The limiting improper integral is absolutely convergent, and the substitution rule changes it into its own negative. Its value is therefore zero, giving . Thus
The question calls a real parameter, but this last formula and the proposed differential equation do not hold on the entire real axis. The defining integral is odd in , because its logarithm depends on . Applying the positive-parameter result to therefore gives the correct extension
with . In particular, for , the right-hand side of the differential equation must be ; for every the unified expression is . The logarithmic quadratic parameter integral therefore provides the requested identity on its valid range and the corrected answer elsewhere.
The partial fraction decomposition is
Taking antiderivatives and using the positive endpoints gives
Hence .
A partial fraction decomposition gives
For the second term the substitution rule , gives a logarithm. Thus
The constant in the antiderivative may be chosen independently on the two intervals separated by .
For the partial fraction decomposition, multiply by to obtain the polynomial identity
Comparing the coefficients gives . Substitution of gives , while gives . Therefore
The original identity holds for ; evaluating the multiplied polynomial identity at those values is valid.
Set , . The finite pulse has Laplace transform . Since , transforming the equation gives
The partial fraction decomposition has inverse . By the Laplace transform time-shift rule,
This finite-pulse response of a first-order linear equation gives the requested outer regions:
For completeness, while the pulse is active the solution is . It is continuous at both switching times. After the forcing stops it grows as , because the homogeneous equation is . The apparent pole at in the full transform is removable; the Bromwich contour may be taken with .
Figure 1.
A unit-area pulse excites an exponentially growing response
. Original calculated responses for two pulse widths and their limiting impulse response. The lower panel shows the prescribed rectangular inputs; their areas are both one. Details.
Since , part (d) gives . A partial fraction decomposition and integration give, for ,
The condition at zero fixes . Thus the full conclusion from the stated condition is
That condition alone does not fix the multiplicative constant. With the usual Legendre function of the second kind normalization , one has . On real exterior intervals replace the logarithm by ; complex continuation requires a choice of logarithm branch.