Past exam of the advanced quantum physics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 3 Solution 2026-10-18
The Zeeman effect comes from . For an Electron, the orbital and spin magnetic moments are approximately and , respectively. This explains both the sign and the relative factor two in the term linear in . The second term is the spin-orbit interaction: the Electron's motion through the atomic electric field produces a magnetic interaction in its rest frame. The relativistic correction, including Thomas precession, and the radial expectation value are incorporated into . This effective Hamiltonian retains the linear Zeeman splitting and spin-orbit coupling, while omitting diamagnetic and hyperfine structure corrections.
Define the angular momentum ladder operators by and similarly for . Direct expansion givesso adding gives the required scalar product. The off-diagonal terms change and in opposite directions. Consequently commutes with , and remains a good quantum number at every magnetic field.
In the given product eigenbasis, the diagonal matrix elements areFor and , the only off-diagonal couplings are between and , and between and . Each relevant orbital ladder factor is and each spin ladder factor is . Multiplying by gives . ThereforeAll other off-diagonal entries vanish either by the ladder endpoints or by conservation of . This derives every entry of the displayed matrix.
The stretched states have no mixing and yieldThe block is , while the block is . Taking the trace and determinant of each block gives the remaining four energy eigenvalues:The subscripts indicate and the superscripts indicate the upper or lower root. These formulas are the Zeeman spectrum for orbital angular momentum one and remain valid for either sign of .
For the usual ordering , including sodium, the zero-field states follow fromThe quartet lies at and the doublet at , separated by . In a weak magnetic field, the Landé g-factors giveThese label the curves near . In a strong magnetic field, the Paschen-Back effect makes the appropriate approximate labels:for the mixed states, with the stretched-state formulas already exact. The branch connections for areWithin a fixed , the nonzero coupling prevents a crossing; this is an avoided crossing. Curves with different may cross because the Hamiltonian does not couple them.
Exact spin-orbit and Zeeman energies for orbital angular momentum one and positive spin-orbit constant
. Details. For the sodium estimate, the zero-field frequency separation fixesThe lower doublet has shifts . The Sodium D-line Zeeman pattern gives photon-frequency shifts times for D and for D. Thus the highest-frequency D component and lowest-frequency D component approach each other by . Extrapolating the weak-field Zeeman splitting givesso the crossover occurs at a field of order , where and the weak-field approximation is becoming marginal.
The exact eigenvalues refine the estimate within this Hamiltonian. The relevant photon energies, with a common zero-field reference omitted, are and . The corresponding electric dipole transitions have and , respectively. Equating them givesIts positive solution is , hencein the retained model. The crossing is between optical transition frequencies; the participating upper states themselves need not be degenerate.
In 1925, Wolfgang Pauli connected two puzzles: alkali metal doublets and their anomalous Zeeman effect, and the capacities of closed electron shells. His paper assigned the extra two-valued property to the optically active Electron, rather than an angular momentum of the closed core. Its Paschen-Back effect classification used four quantum numbers; these historical labels should not be identified literally with modern . The exclusion rule forbade matching all four. This connected resolved one-Electron states with closed-group populations. An additional test was the missing triplet counterpart of the equivalent two--Electron ground state in alkaline earth metals. Pauli explicitly claimed counts of allowed states, not their energies or ordering.[ref]
https://www.chemteam.info/Chem-History/Pauli-1925/Pauli-1925.html. Pauli 1925, §§1–2: four labels, closed groups, exclusion statement and absent triplet s-term; English translation
The modern question is especially concrete: if a Quantum Hamiltonian has a lowest one-particle state, why cannot every Electron occupy it? Minimizing energy answers which of the allowed quantum states is preferred; the Pauli exclusion principle determines which quantum states are allowed in the first place. Spectral lines then test energy differences between allowed multiparticle quantum states. A line count is not itself a direct count of occupied spin orbitals: transitions also depend on selection rules and the prepared quantum state populations. The observed anomalous Zeeman effect supplied constraints for the historical classification; the two-particle antisymmetrization below supplies the modern mathematical explanation of exclusion.
Spin-orbit interaction 2026-10-18
The spin-orbit interaction couples orbital angular momentum to spin. In chemical atoms it helps determine fine structure and the coupling scale that separates weak-field Zeeman splitting from the Paschen-Back effect.
For orbital angular momentum and spin , considerThe quantum number is conserved. The stretched states with have energies . The remaining eigenvalues follow from two blocks with off-diagonal entries :The subscripts denote . For , the zero-field multiplets are at and at . Their weak-field Zeeman splitting is , with Landé g-factors and , respectively. When , the Paschen-Back effect gives approximate product states and energies . Mixing within a fixed causes an avoided crossing; different sectors can cross because the Hamiltonian does not couple them.
