Let and treat the quencher concentration as a constant reservoir. Weak steady excitation, one emitting population, and the three specified processes giveDividing the fluorescence photon-production rate by the absorbed photon rate therefore givesThis assumes no saturation, photochemical loss, reabsorption, static association or additional excited-state decay, and that each counted absorbed photon reaches the stated population. In this restricted scheme and the unquenched lifetime is .
Rearrangement gives the Stern-Volmer equationThus a straight-line plot against has unit intercept and slope . Determine using an independently measured unquenched lifetime, or use known in the restricted model. Yield measurements alone do not separate two unknown rate constants. Equivalently the slope of is .
Use the absorbed intensity rather than incident intensity to normalize samples, and correct solvent/background signals, quencher absorption and fluorescence reabsorption. Under dynamic fluorescence quenching the lifetime ratio should follow the same straight line as the yield ratio. A reduced intensity without the corresponding lifetime change suggests static fluorescence quenching or an optical artefact; curvature can also indicate multiple populations or more complicated kinetics.
A quencher-independent intersystem-crossing rate adds to the unquenched decay rate:The normalized Stern-Volmer equation retains the same form, so intersystem crossing does not bias if the actual unquenched lifetime is used. It reduces below one and changes the slope through ; assuming would then give the wrong result. A quencher that itself changes intersystem crossing or returns triplet population to the singlet requires a larger kinetic scheme.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.