The quotient norm is
Changing the representative does not change the infimum. The triangle inequality and absolute homogeneity follow from those of the original norm. Vanishing means belongs to the closure of , hence to because the subspace is closed. Thus this is a norm.
Use the absolutely convergent series criterion for completeness. If , choose representatives of satisfying . The series converges in the Banach space to some . Since the quotient map is contractive, converges to . Consequently the quotient is a Banach space.
A set is totally bounded if for every it can be covered by finitely many open balls of radius .
Here is the needed separated-sequence argument, including the relevant Riesz lemma. For a proper closed subspace , choose , put , and choose with . Then is a unit vector at distance greater than from . Starting with one unit vector, apply this to the span of the vectors already chosen. These spans are closed and proper because they are finite-dimensional while is infinite-dimensional. The resulting unit vectors satisfy for . A ball of radius contains at most one of them. Hence the closed unit ball is not totally bounded.
Take . A bounded linear operator is compact exactly when the closure of this set is compact. In a complete metric space this is equivalent to its being totally bounded.
If is compact, choose a finite -net for and let be their span. Then for , giving .
Conversely, fix and take with . For every choose with . These approximants satisfy , so form a bounded subset of a finite-dimensional space and have a finite -net. The same centers give a finite -net for . Thus it is totally bounded and is compact. In particular
The natural canonical embedding into the bidual is . It is linear and . A norming functional from the Hahn-Banach theorem gives the reverse inequality, so it is an isometry. A reflexive Banach space is one for which this canonical embedding is onto.
A nonreflexive example is . Its dual is and its bidual is ; the canonical map is the natural inclusion, which misses the constant sequence one. This also shows why merely having an isometric embedding in the bidual is insufficient.
An infinite-dimensional reflexive example is , by the Riesz representation theorem.
The weak topology on is the coarsest topology making every continuous. The weak-star topology on is the coarsest making every evaluation , , continuous. In each case basic neighborhoods impose finitely many evaluation inequalities. The Banach-Alaoglu theorem states that the closed unit ball of a dual space is compact for its weak-star topology. The separation theorem needed here says: if is a nonempty weak-star compact convex subset of a dual space and , then some strictly separates them,
The real-part convention covers complex spaces; for real spaces omit it.
Let be the weak-star closure of inside . This is compact by Banach-Alaoglu, convex, and nonempty. If , separation in the dual pair gives with
But , a contradiction. Therefore , proving the required Goldstine theorem density.
If is reflexive, identifies its weak topology with the weak-star topology of and carries onto , so Banach-Alaoglu gives weak compactness. Conversely, if is weakly compact, its image is weak-star compact, hence closed in the Hausdorff bidual topology. Density then forces . Scaling gives surjectivity on the entire bidual. Thus
The Baire category theorem says that a nonempty complete metric space is not a countable union of closed sets with empty interior; equivalently, every countable intersection of open dense sets is dense. To prove the latter, start with any nonempty open set and open dense sets . Choose closed balls of positive radii with
Each choice is possible by density and openness. Their centers form a Cauchy sequence; its limit exists by completeness and belongs to every closed ball, hence to . This proves density and the theorem.
The Uniform boundedness principle says that a pointwise bounded family of bounded linear maps from a Banach space to a normed space has uniformly bounded operator norms. Put . These sets are closed and cover . Baire gives an open ball . For , the triangle inequality applied to gives . Taking for unit proves .
For the particular expansion, uniqueness makes all coefficient maps and partial-sum maps linear. Since , the norms form a bounded sequence with limit . Also, with ,
This proves both preliminary bounds. The supremum therefore defines a finite norm , with .
To prove (i) implies (ii), the identity map from to is a bounded linear bijection. If (i) holds both spaces are Banach, so the bounded inverse theorem makes its inverse bounded: . This is precisely (ii).
(ii) implies (i): together with the preliminary estimate, (ii) gives equivalent norms,
An equivalent norm on a Banach space is complete: a primed-norm Cauchy sequence has an original-norm limit, and the upper bound makes convergence hold also in the primed norm. (ii) implies (iii) immediately because for every .
(iii) implies (ii): the preliminary bounds show for every . Applying the Uniform boundedness principle to the bounded maps gives .
(iii) implies (iv): the normalization gives
Hence every coordinate functional is bounded.
(iv) implies (iii): is a finite sum of bounded rank-one operators.
(iv) implies (v): continuity gives whenever , so any scalar limit must vanish.
(iv) implies (vi): fix . Continuity gives , while the assumed uniform coordinate convergence gives . Uniqueness of the scalar limit yields for every .
(v) implies (iv). Fix and consider any sequence with . Apply (v) to and . It gives . Thus the graph of is closed. Both spaces are Banach, so the closed graph theorem makes bounded.
(vi) implies (iv) without assuming beforehand that any coordinate functional is continuous. Define the everywhere-defined linear map
The preliminary coordinate bound ensures it really takes values in . Condition (vi) states exactly that its graph is sequentially closed: and in the supremum norm imply . The product is a metric space, so sequentially closed means closed. The closed graph theorem therefore makes bounded. Every coordinate projection on is bounded, hence so is each .
Together with the preceding implications this proves all six conditions are equivalent. No continuity of the coordinate functionals was assumed during the preliminary bounds.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.