Use the complex beam parameter convention
Here is the wavefront curvature, distinguished from the mirror curvature . In an unfolded propagation coordinate, a concave mirror has the ray transfer matrix : a ray at height changes direction by . The return to the original plane is therefore
The Gaussian beam transformation gives
For , and . The returning Gaussian beam consequently has a beam waist at the same plane, with
This alone does not make it the same Gaussian beam; equal Rayleigh ranges require .
Adding the plane mirror requires a self-consistent optical resonator normal mode, . Since , the fixed-point equation reduces to , giving
For a finite stable Gaussian beam, . The same formula remains valid at , where self-consistency selects . At the geometrical hemispherical limit it predicts ; that marginal boundary has no finite-width stable fundamental Gaussian beam. Thus the source's word “hemispherical” is used for the plano-concave family, including the near-hemispherical case below.
Propagate from one beam waist to the other, using the optical lens ray transfer matrix:
Optical mode matching requires to transform to . Multiplying the denominator across gives
Equating real and imaginary parts and multiplying by yields
Set . The second equation gives . Substituting this into the first cancels the terms :
Consequently the two algebraic branches are
Equivalently, . The signs in and are the same. Real solutions require ; a converging optical lens therefore needs . At equality . For the stated arrangement, additionally require and that the chosen optical lens position is accessible outside both optical resonators. A negative is an algebraic virtual-waist solution, not a downstream beam waist.
The source optical resonator has Rayleigh range
The symmetric target optical resonator has its fundamental Gaussian beam beam waist halfway between the mirrors. At distance from that beam waist, wavefront curvature is . Thus
Here , so b gives two real branches:
Only the first branch has the target beam waist downstream of the optical lens. It is also geometrically accessible: the optical lens is beyond the source output mirror, and the target input mirror is beyond the optical lens. The total separation between beam waists is .
For a symmetric confocal optical resonator, the mirror separation equals either mirror's curvature, , so its symmetric fundamental Gaussian beam has
The same optical mode matching calculation applies, now with . Keeping the example's gives and , compared with for the nonconfocal target. With , the two branches become
Again only the positive- branch fits the stated downstream geometry. The confocal target's smaller Rayleigh range means a smaller fundamental beam waist at the same wavelength and a less stringent minimum .
A confocal optical resonator also has transverse normal mode degeneracies: in the ideal paraxial spectrum, increasing transverse order by two shifts the resonance by one longitudinal spacing. Such a cavity can transmit combinations of higher transverse normal modes at a fundamental resonance, so transmitted power alone is a weaker diagnostic of pure fundamental optical mode matching. The degeneracy does not remove the complex beam parameter matching requirement if the objective is specifically the symmetric fundamental Gaussian beam.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.