Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge / 2006 / iii / Paper 73 / 1 / i / Solution

A local stellar relaxation time depends on the number density $n$ of scatterers. Calling $N$ a total number, as the PDF does, leaves the displayed expression dimensionally wrong: ${\sigma }^3/(G^2{m}^{2}N)$ has units of time per volume. The intended local expression must use $n$, or $N/V$ for a homogeneous sample of volume $V$. We shall also make the normalization of the stellar relaxation time explicit, since an unspecified representative one-dimensional velocity dispersion does not fix an exact numerical coefficient.

In a small-angle gravitational encounter, approximate the relative trajectory by a straight line of speed $u$ and impact parameter $b$. The perpendicular acceleration of one star due to the other is $Gmb/(b^2+u^2{t}^2{)}^{3/2}$. Its impulse is thereforeA star encounters $2\pi bdbnu$ scatterers per unit time in this interval of impact parameters. Independent deflections have random directions, so their variances add as in a random walk. Hence the accumulated squared velocity change has rateThe Coulomb logarithm in stellar dynamics arises because each logarithmic interval of impact parameter contributes equally. The lower cutoff is approximately the strong-deflection scale, $b_{\min }\simeq G(2m)/u^2$ for equal masses, or the physical collision scale if larger. The upper cutoff is a scale on which the local density and straight-line encounter approximation cease to apply, such as the local disk thickness. Thus $\Lambda$ is dimensionless; it is not a number density or an arbitrary dimensional argument of a logarithm.

To display the normalization issue, use the representative relative speed $u=\sqrt{2}\sigma$ and define $T(\kappa )$ by $D_{v}T=\kappa {\sigma }^2$. This givesChoosing $\kappa =3/4$ recovers precisely the printed coefficient after repairing $N$ to $n$:This is an explicitly defined convention, not a uniquely derivable normalization from the supplied data. If instead relaxation means a mean-square change equal to the full initial random-speed variance, $3{\sigma }^2$, the same encounter approximation gives $T_R=4T_R^{\mathrm{printed}\mathrm{convention}}$. Averaging the encounter speed distribution instead of using one representative $u$ changes the coefficient again. The robust result is the scaling $T_R\propto {\sigma }^3/(n{G}^2{m}^2\ln \Lambda )$.

For a transparent solar-neighbourhood estimate, take $n=0.1{\mathrm{pc}}^{-3}$, $m=M_{\odot }$, $\sigma =30{\mathrm{km}\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$ and $b_{\max }=300\mathrm{pc}$. With $G=4.3009\times 10^{-3}\mathrm{pc}{M}_{\odot }^{-1}({\mathrm{km}\mathrm{s}}^{-1}{)}^2$, one obtains $b_{\min }=4.78\times 10^{-6}\mathrm{pc}$, $\ln \Lambda =17.96$, andThese illustrative parameters give an order $10^{13}$--$10^{14}$ year stellar relaxation time, much longer than a galactic lifetime of order $10^{10}$ years. The solar neighbourhood is consequently a collisionless stellar system with respect to encounters between individual stars. Scattering by massive clouds and collective structure is a different process; the estimate does not assert that every mechanism of disk heating is negligible.