Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge / 2017 / iii / Paper 311 / 2

A null geodesic congruence is a smooth family of null geodesics filling a region without crossings there. Choose a smooth future-directed tangent $U^a$ and an affine parameter $\lambda$, soThe space orthogonal to $U$ is degenerate because it contains $U$ itself. To measure genuine transverse separation, introduce an auxiliary null vector $N^a$ with $U\cdot N=-1$ and the screen-space projectorIn four dimensions $q$ has a positive-definite two-dimensional image and annihilates $U$ and $N$. The optical tensor is the transverse part of the velocity derivative,Its irreducible decomposition defines the three optical quantities:The null expansion is the fractional rate of change of a small transverse area, $\theta =d\log \delta A/d\lambda$. The symmetric trace-free null shear distorts the shape of the transverse beam without changing its area at first order. The antisymmetric null twist, also called rotation of the congruence, describes the rotational part of its transverse deformation. These are properties of the screen quotient $U^{\perp }/⟨U⟩$; the auxiliary vector chooses a convenient representative of that quotient. For an affinely parametrized null geodesic congruence, the contraction constraints also give $\theta ={\nabla }_a{U}^a$.

Parallel transport the auxiliary null vector $N$ and a screen basis along each generator of the null geodesic congruence. This keeps the screen-space projector fixed under the corresponding transported derivative. Use the curvature convention $[{\nabla }_c,{\nabla }_b]V_a=-R^d{}_{acb}{V}_d$.

With $B_{ab}={\nabla }_b{U}_a$, differentiation of the affine geodesic equation givesHere the first term comes from commuting the derivative past $U^c$, and the second from the curvature commutator. The constraints $B_{ab}{U}^a=B_{ab}{U}^b=0$ follow respectively from the null normalization and affine geodesic equation. Projecting onto the screen therefore yields the optical matrix equationThe trace of the tidal matrix is $R_{ab}{U}^a{U}^b$; extra terms from replacing the screen trace by the spacetime trace vanish by curvature antisymmetry. Taking the trace givesDecompose the optical tensor as $\hat{B}=\frac{1}{2}\theta I+\hat{\sigma }+\hat{\omega }$. The null shear is symmetric and trace-free and the null twist is antisymmetric. Their cross traces vanish, andThe negative sign in the last term is the identity $\mathrm{tr}({\hat{\omega }}^2)=-{\sum }_{I,J}{\hat{\omega }}_{IJ}^2$ on the positive-definite screen. Substitution proves the four-dimensional Null Raychaudhuri equation:The coefficient is $1/(D-2)$ in $D$ spacetime dimensions; the factor $1/2$ here belongs to the four-dimensional congruence in this question, not the five-dimensional geometry of the next question.

The Einstein field equations and the null energy condition imply the null convergence condition:The scalar-curvature and any cosmological constant terms vanish because $U^a{U}_a=0$. For generators of the null hypersurface, the supplied twist-free property gives $\hat{\omega }=0$. The null shear squared is nonnegative on the screen. Thus the Null Raychaudhuri equation impliesStarting from $\theta ({\lambda }_0)={\theta }_0<0$, the null expansion remains negative for as long as the regular congruence exists. HenceBefore the right-hand side reaches zero, inversion of the negative quantities givesSince the inverse of a finite negative null expansion cannot be nonnegative, the regular congruence cannot continue through the proposed upper limit. The null focusing theorem therefore givesProvided the geodesic itself extends this far, the transverse area collapses and $\theta \to -\infty$ at or before this bound. An earlier end of the affine geodesic would instead be geodesic incompleteness. A divergence of the null expansion marks a caustic or a conjugate point to a spacelike surface; it does not by itself establish a curvature singularity.

The relevant Penrose singularity theorem states: a connected time-oriented four-dimensional globally hyperbolic spacetime with a noncompact Cauchy hypersurface, a nonempty compact orientable boundaryless trapped surface, and the null convergence condition is future null-geodesically incomplete. Under the Einstein field equations, the null energy condition supplies the curvature hypothesis. A trapped surface here is spacelike and has both future normal null expansions strictly negative. The conclusion is an incomplete null geodesic, not necessarily a divergent curvature invariant at an identifiable point.

Suppose, for contradiction, that every future null geodesic is complete. Write $S$ for the trapped surface andThe equality follows because the causal future of a compact set is closed in a globally hyperbolic spacetime. This future horismos is a closed achronal boundary. It is nonempty: the restriction of a Cauchy time function to compact $S$ has a minimum, and a point at that minimum cannot be chronologically preceded by another point of $S$.

Normalize the two future null normal directions along $S$ against a smooth future timelike field, fixing the affine scale continuously. Their initial null expansions are continuous and strictly negative. Compactness of the normalized normal bundle gives a uniform $c>0$ with ${\theta }_{\pm }\le -c$ everywhere on $S$. The preceding null focusing theorem forces a conjugate point to a spacelike surface along each normal generator within affine length $L=2/c$.

By the supplied boundary-generator result, every point of $E^{+}(S)$ is reached by an orthogonal future null geodesic which has no earlier conjugate point. No such boundary generator can remain on the boundary beyond its first focal point. Every point of $E^{+}(S)$ therefore lies inThe parameter set is compact. Future null completeness makes its geodesic flow defined throughout this common finite interval, and smooth dependence on initial data makes its image $K$ compact. Since $E^{+}(S)$ is closed and contained in $K$, it is compact. This is the compactness of the future horismos of a trapped surface step; a merely pointwise finite bound would not suffice without compactness and uniform normalization.

Choose a smooth complete timelike vector field, obtained if necessary by positive rescaling against a complete auxiliary Riemannian metric. Its inextendible integral curves of a vector field meet a chosen smooth Cauchy hypersurface $C$ exactly once. Projection along those curves defines a continuous map ${\pi }_C:E^{+}(S)\to C$. The achronal set property makes this map an injective function: two boundary points on the same timelike integral curve of a vector field would be timelike related.

An achronal boundary is a topological hypersurface without boundary, even at nonsmooth generator junctions; the submanifold property allowed in the question supplies this fact. Thus domain and codomain are both three-dimensional topological manifolds without boundary. Invariance of domain makes ${\pi }_C(E^{+}(S))$ open in $C$. Compactness makes it closed in the Hausdorff space $C$, and it is nonempty. Connectedness of the spacetime gives connectedness of $C$, so this image is all of $C$. That would make $C$ compact, contradicting the noncompact Cauchy hypersurface hypothesis. The completeness assumption is false, proving the theorem.

The noncompactness hypothesis and strict trapping are essential to this version. Global hyperbolicity cannot simply be omitted in the compactness and projection steps, and nonpositive initial expansion with zeros does not supply the uniform focusing bound used here.