For a spherical planet, combine the hydrostatic pressure support equation with :Neglect surface pressure. Since , the hydrostatic lower bound on planetary central pressure isFor a physically usual mass density decreasing outward, the mean interior density exceeds the global mean. Hence , giving the sharper minimum within this class,Uniform mass density attains the sharper bound; direct integration with gives . Real planets are centrally concentrated through compression and dense cores, so their central pressure is higher.
Using , , , and , the universal bounds are approximately for Earth and for Jupiter. The uniform-density estimates are respectively and , or and megabars. Either comparison gives a Jupiter minimum about 6.4 times the Earth minimum.
At from a four-solar-luminosity star, the incident flux is proportional to , approximately the same as for Jupiter at around the Sun. Thus Jupiter supplies a possible old comparison at roughly the same mass and irradiation.
Assume the radius law holds from the young epoch to an old age of , that the irradiation history can be represented by the same fixed value, and that the present old radius is . If is approximated by stellar age, thenIf instead starts at completion of formation, the model's formation delay of up to leaves the young planet with thermal age between and . Taking the old thermal age as approximately then gives –.
Thus an exponent of order 0.1 is a reasonable conditional estimate. A single radius at one age cannot determine both the exponent and normalization of a power law; the old Jupiter comparison and the assumptions about formation time and irradiation are essential.
Exoplanet transit photometry discovers a giant planet through a periodic flux decrement and measures . Stellar-radius estimates turn this into a planetary radius. The radial-velocity method discovers the stellar orbital reflex motion and constrains . Follow-up exoplanet transit photometry is required to measure a geometric radius when such a planet also transits; a radial-velocity detection alone gives no direct size. Alternatively, exoplanet direct imaging finds young luminous giants, whose sizes are inferred less directly from luminosity, temperature, distance, and a planetary mass-radius relation or atmosphere model.
The two broad explanations for hot-Jupiter radius inflation are retention of primordial heat and addition of new interior power.
Delayed cooling of an inflated giant planet can arise from enhanced atmospheric opacity, which slows radiative escape; an irradiation-maintained radiative blanket, which insulates the convective interior; or compositional stratification and inefficient layered convection, which inhibit the outward transport of heat. These alter the rate of Kelvin-Helmholtz contraction.
Heating of an inflated giant planet can arise from tidal heating maintained by eccentricity or obliquity; Joule heating of currents driven by atmospheric winds through a magnetic field; or downward transport and dissipation of atmospheric mechanical energy generated by irradiation. To affect radius, the energy must be deposited at a depth and rate that changes the interior cooling balance. Simply absorbing starlight high in the atmosphere does not automatically supply deep heating. These are proposed mechanisms with different efficiencies, not six universally established contributions in every inflated planet.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.