Let . The likelihood function is
On its feasible range , this is decreasing in . Therefore the maximum likelihood estimator is
A statistic is sufficient for if the conditional distribution of the full sample given does not depend on . It is minimal sufficient if it is a function of every sufficient statistic.
The likelihood factors as
so the Fisher-Neyman factorization theorem shows that , and hence its one-to-one transform , is sufficient. Moreover, for two samples and , the ratio is independent of exactly when their maxima agree. The likelihood-ratio criterion for minimal sufficiency therefore shows that and are minimal sufficient.
For , the sample mean is not sufficient: two samples can have the same mean but different maxima, and their likelihood ratio then depends on through the support indicators. It is consequently not minimal sufficient. For the degenerate special case , the sample mean and maximum coincide and both conclusions reverse.
The scaled maximum
has cumulative distribution function for . Thus
The mean squared error of the maximum likelihood estimator is therefore
Each from the uniform distribution on has mean and variance . The sample mean is unbiased and has variance , hence
Because , for fixed and sufficiently large ,
Therefore
Equivalently, converges in distribution to an exponential distribution of rate one.
Put . The limiting probability
and the certain inequality suggest the approximate confidence interval
Since , its expected length is
as required.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.