Center the board at the origin and map each white square to
The white squares become the integer points of the diamond
and a bishop move changes exactly one coordinate. From the chain can move first to and then to , since both points lie in . Reversing such paths connects any two states, so the bishop random walk is an irreducible Markov chain.
Solved by gpt-5.6-sol high.
In the diamond coordinates, the horizontal line through has points and the vertical line has points. There is a numerical constant , independent of and of the starting point, such that the walk enters the middle diamond within two steps with probability at least . To see this, suppose , so . With probability at least the first move uses the longer horizontal line, and a fixed positive fraction of its choices have . From , the vertical line has length at least , is chosen with probability bounded below, and a fixed positive fraction of its points satisfy . The case is symmetric.
Now couple two copies. Independently use the preceding construction until both lie in , an event having probability at least in two steps. From and in that diamond, their horizontal line ranges overlap in at least values. A maximal coupling of the next moves can therefore, with probability bounded below, send them to and for the same . Their vertical lines are then identical, and another maximal coupling makes the two states equal with probability bounded below. Thus there are constants and , independent of , for which the two copies coalesce during every block of steps with conditional probability at least .
The coupling time consequently has a geometric tail. By the coupling inequality for total variation, for each fixed ,
Since a nontrivial chain has mixing time bounded below by a positive constant, the mixing time has constant order.
Solved by gpt-5.6-sol high.
For every , define the Walsh character
These functions form an orthonormal basis. For the lazy walk, which stays put with probability and otherwise flips a uniformly chosen coordinate,
Hence the eigenvalue has multiplicity , for .
The supplied spectral upper bound for total variation mixing gives
At , the last expression is . Choosing so that this is at most proves
Solved by gpt-5.6-sol high.
Assume without loss of generality that and let . By Chebyshev inequality,
Using the event in the variational definition of total variation distance gives
Start the lazy hypercube walk at and write
This is an eigenfunction with eigenvalue , so
The stated variance estimates allow the preceding lemma with and
For , is bounded below by a constant multiple of , uniformly for all sufficiently large . Choosing so that , and absorbing finitely many small into the constant, proves
Solved by gpt-5.6-sol high.
The urn count is the lumped Markov chain obtained from the lazy hypercube walk by recording its Hamming weight. Starting from , the hypercube law is uniform on every Hamming sphere, as is its stationary law conditional on the sphere. Consequently the total variation distance of the full walk from stationarity equals that of its Hamming-weight projection.
Parts (a) and (b) place every fixed- mixing time at
The window is little-, so the sequence exhibits cutoff for Markov chains at with an order- window.
Solved by gpt-5.6-sol high.
The Dirichlet form of a Markov chain is
When is reversible, this equals .
Solved by gpt-5.6-sol high.
For a finite reversible lazy chain, the relaxation time is , where is the spectral gap. Its spectral profile is
The variational characterization of the spectral gap is
Every class is contained in the class over which this last infimum is taken, so and . Therefore
Solved by gpt-5.6-sol high.
Let . Since the degrees lie between and ,
The Generalized Cheeger inequality and for give
For all larger , part (a) gives . Split the supplied spectral-profile integral at to obtain
Solved by gpt-5.6-sol high.
Under the standard intended reading that the added edges form a perfect matching between and , the claim follows as follows. Degrees in remain bounded in terms of . For , write and . The matching contributes at least boundary edges, while expansion inside contributes a constant multiple of . A case split according as or shows
Thus has a uniform Cheeger constant. Cheeger inequality gives a uniformly bounded relaxation time, while . The usual spectral mixing estimate, or part (b), then gives .
If “adding edges” permits all vertices to attach to the same vertex of , the assertion is false as written. Take to be a path and attach every vertex of the expander to one endpoint. A walk started at the other endpoint needs order time to reach the attachment endpoint, so its mixing time is not . The perfect-matching interpretation is therefore necessary.
Solved by gpt-5.6-sol high.
For a path , its -length is . The corresponding path metric is
Because every edge length is at least one, whenever .
Solved by gpt-5.6-sol high.
Let and let be the invariant distribution. Iterating the assumed Wasserstein contraction gives
Since , the coupling characterization of total variation distance implies
The right side is at most when
which proves the claimed mixing bound.
Solved by gpt-5.6-sol high.
For any two states , the closed neighbourhood of has at most vertices. The remaining induced graph therefore has at least vertices and maximum degree at most , so the greedy independent-set bound supplies an independent set of size there. No vertex of is adjacent to a vertex of . Replace the elements of one at a time by the elements of , and then replace the elements of one at a time by those of . Every intermediate set is independent, and every prescribed swap has positive transition probability. Hence the chain is irreducible.
Solved by gpt-5.6-sol high.
If distinct states communicate in one step, they differ by a unique removed vertex and a unique inserted vertex. Consequently
Thus the transition matrix is symmetric, so detailed balance holds for the uniform distribution on . Irreducibility makes this invariant distribution unique.
Solved by gpt-5.6-sol high.
Give the state graph the unit-edge path metric. The construction in part (i) shows that its diameter is at most . It remains to couple one step from neighbouring states and .
Pair the choice in the first chain with in the second, and pair every with itself; use the same proposed vertex in both chains. When the pair is removed, the chains coalesce whenever is not in the closed neighbourhood of . This has probability at least
When a common is removed, the distance can increase from one to at most two only if lies in one of the closed neighbourhoods of and , an event of probability at most
Therefore
where the last inequality uses . The Path coupling theorem extends this contraction to arbitrary starting distributions. Since , part (a) with diameter at most yields
Solved by gpt-5.6-sol high.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.