At every , the Cauchy-Riemann equations are
To derive them from complex differentiability, approach along real increments . The complex derivative gives
Approaching along imaginary increments instead gives
These limits exist because is holomorphic. Equating their real and imaginary parts proves the equations, together with .
A sufficient condition is that is a connected space. Suppose, towards a contradiction, that is the same constant throughout . If , then , contradicting .
If , differentiate in and , and use the Cauchy-Riemann equations from part (a). They give
The coefficient matrix for has determinant . Hence , so everywhere. A holomorphic function with zero complex derivative is locally constant: within a small disc, differentiate along a straight segment. Local constancy and connectedness imply constancy on , again a contradiction.
Consequently,
This is the constant-modulus holomorphic function principle. The extra hypothesis matters: on two disjoint open discs, define on one and on the other. It is holomorphic and nonconstant, yet everywhere.
The function is holomorphic on and has
Its imaginary part is exactly the prescribed . Thus is a real-valued holomorphic function. The Cauchy-Riemann equations force both partial derivatives of its real part to vanish. Since is a connected space, is a single real constant. All possibilities are therefore
Conversely every such function has the stated imaginary part. The data determine only up to this real additive constant.
The identity theorem states: if is a nonempty connected open set and are holomorphic functions on , and their equality set has a limit point in , then
The interior location of the limit point and connectedness are essential hypotheses.
For the proof put . At any , its convergent Taylor series either has every coefficient zero, making zero on a neighbourhood, or has a first nonzero coefficient, of degree . In the latter case,
where is holomorphic near . By continuity, is nonzero on a smaller disc. Thus any zero at is isolated unless vanishes on a neighbourhood. An accumulation of distinct zeros at the assumed interior limit point therefore forces the neighbourhood alternative.
Let be the set of points of with a neighbourhood on which . We have just proved , and is an open set. It is also a closed set relative to : a point of its closure outside would be approached by distinct points of , hence by zeros, and the same Taylor series argument would place it in . Since is connected, . Thus on , proving the theorem.
Define . To apply the identity theorem, we first verify that is holomorphic; mere complex conjugation of the values of would not suffice. For ,
Thus is an entire function, just as is. At each positive integer , the point is real and is real, so . These distinct points accumulate at . The identity theorem on the connected complex plane gives
This is conjugate reflection of a holomorphic function, with the reality data forcing equality to its reflection.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.