The sequence is a Markov chain when the conditional law of its next state depends on the past only through the current state. Precisely, for each history of positive probability and every ,A time-homogeneous chain additionally has transition probabilities independent of , written . The displayed single transition matrix in the subsequent parts specifies this time-homogeneous case.
First the entries must be nonnegative: together with the given , validity of the transition matrix requires and . Every row then sums to one.
The only incoming edge to state is , of probability . If , no other state can reach , so the chain is not irreducible. If , all edges in the directed cyclehave positive probability, since , and . Traversing this cycle connects every state to every other state. Therefore
Within the valid parameter rectangle, suppose and . The chain is then irreducible by part (i). State has a two-step return and a three-step return , both of positive probability. Its period of a state in a Markov chain therefore divides both two and three, hence equals one. Irreducibility gives the same period to every state, so the chain is aperiodic.
If and , every transition goes between the two classes and . Returns must have even length, while has length two. Thus the irreducible chain has period two.
If , the closed communicating class alternates between and . Its states have period two, using the positive two-step returns through . Consequently the chain is not aperiodic, regardless of how the transient state is classified. Combining the cases,
Here the valid parameters lie in the irreducible aperiodic range. The finite-state theorem on convergence to an invariant distribution therefore implies convergence to the unique stationary distribution, independently of the initial state.
Solve and . The equations for states giveHence and . Normalization gives , soStationarity alone would not guarantee convergence of the one-time distributions; irreducibility and aperiodicity justify that final limit.
A joint probability density function must be measurable, nonnegative almost everywhere, and normalized:It determines the joint law by for measurable sets . Values on sets of planar measure zero may be changed without changing that law.
The variables are not independent. Their joint support excludes and simultaneously, since every point with positive joint density satisfies . Yet each event separately has positive probability: the density is strictly positive on open triangular subregions where , and similarly where . ThusThis contradicts the event factorization required for independence of random variables. The product-shaped formula on its support does not undo the dependence created by the triangular support.
For , integrate the joint probability density function over its allowed -range:Outside this interval it is zero. Therefore the marginal density isIts integral is , also checking the original joint normalization. By symmetry has the same marginal density.
From the marginal density,The mixed moment isThus the covariance isThe negative sign is consistent with the support constraint: a large value of one variable leaves a smaller available range for the other.
For , the conditional density is obtained by dividing the joint density by the positive marginal density:Consequentlywhich integrates to one. Its conditional expectation isThis uses the usual continuous conditional-density version, defined by the density ratio at a point where is positive; conditioning does not require the event itself to have positive probability.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.