Take a smooth variation with on the boundary. Differentiating under the integral gives the first variation
Integration by parts removes the derivatives of , and the boundary contribution vanishes. The fundamental lemma of the calculus of variations therefore gives
For a regular constraint , the Lagrange multiplier rule says that an extremal satisfies for a constant . Equivalently, apply the preceding Euler–Lagrange equation to . Regularity means that is not identically zero as a linear functional on the admissible variations. For the quadratic constraint below this holds at every nonzero admissible ; a zero constraint leaves only .
In polar coordinates the constrained integrand is
Its Euler–Lagrange equation is , or
The field is single-valued and periodic in . Substitution with gives
The centre is part of the disk, so one must also select the regular radial solution: for , smoothness gives and the regular derivative behaviour; for , is bounded and . A singular solution at zero does not define an admissible smooth field on the disk.
For fixed , let , so and for . The angular derivative term has integral , including zero when . Consequently
The one-dimensional Euler–Lagrange equation for is
exactly the same radial equation. The common factor cancels.
For two regular solutions with the same and different multipliers, multiply the equation for by , multiply that for by , subtract and integrate. The result is
At , both functions vanish; at zero, regularity makes the boundary term tend to zero. Since the multipliers are distinct,
This is weighted Sturm–Liouville orthogonality with weight .
Finally, multiply one radial equation by and integrate by parts. The same endpoint conditions yield
Multiplication by proves
For any nonzero admissible solution the energy on the left before subtraction is positive, so its multiplier is the positive Rayleigh quotient .

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.