Configurational entropy counts the arrangements compatible with a macroscopic configuration: . Let , and . The multiplicity is . Stirling's approximation therefore gives
With downward positive, the gravitational potential energy is . Minimizing the Helmholtz free energy gives , hence
Raising temperature reduces the extension: the entropic preference for many up/down arrangements opposes alignment by the load. For small loads, .
For the positive-feedback entropic chain with replacement force , , the conservative potential is . Using would overcount it by a factor two. The stationary equation becomes
Expansion about gives
For the stable extension is zero. Below , nonzero minima appear, with close to the transition and as . Restricting to downward extensions selects the positive branch. The onset is continuous in this model, with a nonanalytic mean-field change at ; a finite jump in does not follow from the printed force law, despite the question's discontinuity wording. A finite chain has rounded fluctuations rather than a literal thermodynamic singularity.
Figure 1.
Positive-feedback chain: continuous mean-field extension and changing free-energy minima
. Details.
This is the same self-consistency equation as the zero-field mean-field treatment of the Ising model: the segment orientation corresponds to a spin, extension to magnetization, and the extension-dependent force to the self-consistent molecular field. The competition between alignment energy and binary configurational entropy explains the shared temperature dependence.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.