The conditions on the cumulative distribution function imply almost surely. With , adjoin and the trivial . The random variables are nonnegative, adapted, and bounded by at each fixed time. Independence and give
Thus this is the product martingale from independent mean-one factors, with . The almost sure supermartingale convergence theorem states that a nonnegative supermartingale converges almost surely to a finite integrable random variable. Applied to this nonnegative martingale, it shows almost surely. Every convergent real sequence is bounded, so almost surely.
The printed maximum can in fact be taken literally here. If almost surely, all products equal . Otherwise the strict Jensen equality criterion, applied to the strictly convex function on , gives . Independence yields . By Markov's inequality, for every . The First Borel-Cantelli lemma and the countable choices give almost surely. Since , a sequence with this limit attains its positive supremum among finitely many initial terms. This is an instance of fractional moment decay of independent mean-one products.
Use the nonnegative martingale and filtration established above. Fix a finite and let
For , is the union of the threshold-crossing events up to , so is a bounded stopping time. The optional stopping theorem for a martingale at a bounded stopping time gives . On one has ; on its complement one still has . Therefore
Only a bounded stopping time has been used, so no extra uniform integrability assumption at an unbounded hitting time is implicit. This is also the Doob maximal inequality for a nonnegative submartingale specialized to a mean-one martingale.
For , the bound ensures the finite moment . By Jensen's inequality, . The process is an adapted, nonnegative integrable random variable at each time, and independence gives
Thus is a submartingale, and . The Doob maximal inequality for a nonnegative submartingale states that for . Apply it with . Since the power function is increasing on ,
Combining this with the preceding bound gives
The result is a bound on the running maximum, which is why a maximal inequality for a submartingale, rather than an estimate of the single terminal random variable, is needed.[ref]

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.