Past exam of the short options paper shared by Prelims and Parts A and B of the physics course of the University of Oxford / 2018 / S26 / 2

Opacity is the extinction cross section per unit mass for radiation; a frequency-dependent value ${\kappa }_{\nu }$ gives $d{I}_{\nu }/ds=-{\kappa }_{\nu }\rho I_{\nu }$ when emission is considered separately. Stellar radiative diffusion generally uses an appropriately weighted Rosseland mean opacity. The associated local mean free path is of order $1/(\kappa \rho )$.

At sufficiently high temperature the material is highly ionized, and scattering by free electrons is often dominant for ordinary stellar densities and photon energies well below the electron rest energy. Bound-bound and bound-free absorption weaken as bound electrons disappear; free-free absorption can still matter depending on temperature and density. Thus “high temperature” does not fix the dominant opacity at every possible density. The next part explicitly imposes a Kramers absorption law as a separate scaling model.

Use characteristic stellar values in the supplied radiative temperature gradient: $T_c/R\sim \kappa \rho L/(R^2{T}_c^3)$. Hence $L\propto T_c^{4}R/(\kappa \rho )$. With Kramers opacity, $\kappa ={\kappa }_0\rho T_c^{-3.5}$,Hydrostatic support by an ideal gas gives $T_c\propto \mu M_s/R$, or $R\propto \mu M_s/T_c$. Substitution then yieldsThe result assumes homologous density and temperature profiles, comparable structural constants, gas-pressure support and radiative transport throughout. It is not simultaneously an electron-scattering-opacity result; replacing Kramers opacity changes the exponents. Convection, degenerate cores or a different opacity regime limit quantitative application to real evolved helium stars.

For fully ionized hydrogen with a small metal fraction, there is approximately one proton and one electron per hydrogen mass, so ${\mu }_H\simeq 1/2$. The Kramers coefficient is proportional to $Z(1+X)\simeq 2Z$. Denote this star's luminosity by $L_H$; the supplied proportionality law alone does not fix its absolute normalization.

Relative to the helium-dominated comparison star, the calculation in part ii givesIf one uses a roughly solar luminosity as an illustrative calibration for this roughly solar-mass, solar-central-temperature reference, the helium star would be of order a hundred solar luminosities. That calibration is only approximate because a mostly hydrogen composition with $\mu \simeq 1/2$ is not the actual solar composition.

Fully ionized helium supplies three particles per four hydrogen masses, so ${\mu }_{\mathrm{He}}\simeq 4/3$. The same small $Z$, but negligible hydrogen fraction, gives ${\kappa }_{0,\mathrm{He}}\propto Z$, half the hydrogen-star coefficient. The relative luminosity isConsequentlyThe very strong molecular-weight dependence outweighs the reduction in mass. Treating the two opacities as identical would miss a factor two, and using neutral-gas molecular weights would be inconsistent with the stated hot ionized stars.

Core-helium-burning stars populate the horizontal branch and red clump; hot subdwarf B stars provide examples with a helium-burning core of roughly half a solar mass and a very small remaining hydrogen envelope. Their high luminosity relative to mass, hot spectra and locations away from an ordinary hydrogen-burning main sequence are observational evidence for such evolved configurations.

A plausible history starts with a hydrogen-burning star. After central hydrogen exhaustion, hydrogen-shell burning builds a compact helium core and the envelope expands on the red giant branch. Sufficient core temperature ignites helium, often by a helium flash for a low-mass degenerate core. Strong mass loss or binary interaction can strip most of the hydrogen envelope, exposing a hot helium-burning remnant; retaining a substantial envelope instead gives an ordinary horizontal-branch or red-clump star.

The simple radiative Kramers scaling estimates a luminosity contrast but does not uniquely identify one evolutionary state or predict a real subdwarf luminosity precisely. A similarly low-mass helium white dwarf would be a cooling, degenerate object rather than the sustained high-temperature helium-burning configuration assumed here.