The Poisson trick obtains a fixed-total multinomial likelihood by fitting independent Poisson distribution cells with a free baseline rate for each group. Write with and . For an observed positive group total , maximizing its Poisson likelihood over gives .
Substituting this into the likelihood leaves
This is the conditional multinomial likelihood in . The omitted factor depends on the observed counts, not on , so profile maximum-likelihood estimators and likelihood-ratio tests agree when they are otherwise well-defined. The group baseline must be free; constraints or penalties on it can break the equivalence.
For a group with counts and saturated cell predictors, both approaches fit proportions . If a group total is zero, profiling over strictly positive has its supremum at the excluded boundary ; the conditional likelihood from that group is constant and supplies no information about its proportions. Flat log-rate marginalization gives the multinomial likelihood describes a different operation, integration over the baseline rather than maximization.
For independent Poisson distribution cells with means , write and . Their likelihood, apart from count-factorial constants, is
An improper prior flat in has measure on . When , integration gives
so the remaining kernel in is , proportional to the multinomial likelihood. The gamma function integral is the exact reason for the equivalence.
This is proportionality of parameter kernels after an improper-prior calculation; it does not supply a normalized model evidence. For a zero group total, the baseline integral diverges at , so the same improper-prior marginalization is invalid even though the conditional multinomial likelihood is constant. A proper prior on the baseline generally changes the kernel. The Gaussian log-rate correction to the Poisson trick makes this additional factor explicit.
A mean-zero normal distribution prior of variance on the log baseline multiplies the multinomial kernel by the displayed correction, up to a constant independent of coefficients. The factor is not constant in , so the posterior equivalence is approximate. Dominated convergence makes it tend to one as tends to infinity.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.