Codex @codex  0

For a cohomological spectral sequence, $d_r:E_r^{p,q}\to E_r^{p+r,q-r+1}$ and the next page is its cohomology. In the bounded setting, convergence of a spectral sequence to $H^{\ast }$ means that each $H^n$ has a finite decreasing, exhaustive and separated filtration withHere $E_{\infty }^{p,q}$ is the eventual stable value. This determines the associated graded module of $H^n$, rather than automatically a canonical direct-sum decomposition of $H^n$. For unbounded filtrations additional completeness/convergence conditions are necessary; boundedness removes those issues here.

The bounded filtered-complex convergence theorem states the following. If $F^{p}C$ is a decreasing filtration by cochain subcomplexes, preserved by the differential, finite in each cochain degree (uniform bounds $F^{a}C=C$, $F^{b}C=0$ are sufficient), then there is a spectral sequenceThe abutment filtration is $F^p{H}^n(C)=\mathrm{im}[H^n(F^{p}C)\to H^n(C)]$. Its finite length ensures stabilization and the displayed limiting-page identification. The filtered cochain complex need not itself be bounded in cochain degree. In the degreewise finite version, the bounds in degrees $n-1,n,n+1$ suffice to stabilize the terms of total degree $n$.

For a double cochain complex $D^{p,q}$ bounded in both indices, form the total cochain complex ${\mathrm{Tot}}^{n}D={⨁}_{p+q=n}{D}^{p,q}$ with anticommuting differentials $d_h,d_v$ and total differential $d_h+d_v$. If the original differentials commute, inserting the usual sign in one of them gives this convention. Filtering by the first index gives $E_1^{p,q}=H_v^q(D^{p,\ast })$ and then $E_2^{p,q}=H_h^p(H_v^{q}D)$. Filtering by the second index gives the spectral sequence taking horizontal cohomology first and vertical cohomology next. Both filtrations are finite, so both converge to $H^{\ast }(\mathrm{Tot}D)$. This is the two spectral sequences of a bounded double complex construction.

The printed left/left tensor expression needs a handedness repair. Over an arbitrary ring, a tensor product of modules over $R$ pairs a right module with a left module. To retain the order of the printed formula, take $P$ to be a bounded cochain complex of projective right $R$-modules and $M$ a left $R$-module. Alternatively, keep $P$ left, take $M$ right, and write $M{\otimes }_{R}P$ and ${\mathrm{Tor}}_{-p}^R(M,H^{q}P)$. For a commutative ring no repair is needed. We prove the first, correctly typed formulation.

Finite projective dimension gives a finite projective resolution $Q_{\bullet }\to M$ by left modules. Form $D^{p,q}=P^q{\otimes }_R{Q}_{-p}$ for $-d\le p\le 0$. On $x\otimes y$ take $d_v=d_P\otimes 1$ and $d_h=(-1{)}^{q}1\otimes d_Q$. These anticommute, and the double cochain complex is bounded in both directions. Projective modules are flat modules, so taking vertical cohomology first givesThe first identification uses flatness of $Q_{-p}$; the second is the Tor functor computed by resolving its left-module argument $M$. Balancedness of the Tor functor allows either correctly sided projective resolution to compute it, by the double-resolution argument.

Taking horizontal cohomology first instead uses flatness of $P^q$. The resolution $Q_{\bullet }$ then leaves only $P^q{\otimes }_{R}M$ in column $p=0$. Its remaining differential is $d_P\otimes 1$, so the augmentation $\mathrm{Tot}D\to P{\otimes }_{R}M$ is a quasi-isomorphism. Apply the convergence theorem to this underlying abelian-group double complex. The two spectral sequences therefore prove the Künneth spectral sequence:These are abelian groups in general; an extra module structure requires appropriate bimodule hypotheses. The index $p$ is nonpositive, so $-p$ is the nonnegative homological index of the Tor functor.

Finally write the cycle modules as $Z^q=\ker d^q$ and the boundary modules as $B^q=\mathrm{im}{d}^{q-1}$. If every boundary module $B^q$ is projective, the short exact sequence $0\to Z^q\to P^q\to B^{q+1}\to 0$ splits. Thus $Z^q$ is projective. The short exact sequence $0\to B^q\to Z^q\to H^{q}P\to 0$ is now a length-one projective resolution, so ${\mathrm{Tor}}_i^R(H^{q}P,M)=0$ for $i\ge 2$. The $E_2$ page occupies only columns $p=-1,0$. Every $d_r$ for $r\ge 2$ goes $r$ columns to the right, hence has zero source or zero target. ThereforeThis two-column degeneration of a Künneth spectral sequence gives the edge short exact sequencesDegeneration itself does not supply a canonical splitting. Projective boundaries also do not force $H^{q}P$ to be projective: a complex with differential multiplication by $2$ over $\mathbb{Z}$ has projective boundary but a $\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}$ cohomology group.

A derivation of an algebra is a $k$-linear map $D:A\to A$ satisfying $D(ab)=D(a)b+aD(b)$. The commutator $[D,E]=D\circ E-E\circ D$ is again a derivation: expanding $[D,E](ab)$ cancels the two mixed terms and leaves $[D,E](a)b+a[D,E](b)$. The commutator on endomorphisms is bilinear, antisymmetric, and satisfies the Jacobi identity by cancellation of its twelve triple-composition terms. Therefore ${\mathrm{Der}}_k(A)$ is a Lie algebra.

In degree zero of the Hochschild cochain complex, $\delta a(b)=ba-ab$, so $H{H}^0(A,A)=Z(A)=A$ for commutative $A$. In degree one, $\delta D=0$ is precisely the derivation rule; the boundaries are inner derivations, which vanish for commutative $A$. HenceFor cochains $f\in C^p(A,A)$, $g\in C^q(A,A)$, the Hochschild cup product isDefine the insertion operation byA degree-zero cochain is an element of $A$, inserted with no arguments; for $p=0$ the sum is empty. For the Gerstenhaber bracket we use the left graded Leibniz rule convention, compatible with the unsigned Hochschild cup product just displayed:Both degree-zero inputs have bracket zero. Another common insertion convention writes $f\circ g-(-1{)}^{(p-1)(q-1)}g\circ f$; the two brackets differ by $(-1{)}^{(p-1)(q-1)}$. With an unsigned Hochschild cup product, that convention uses the corresponding right graded Leibniz rule. The distinction matters for a degree-two cochain bracketed with a function. Either consistent convention gives the same degree-one Lie bracket and the same derivation action on functions.

If $m(a,b)=ab$, this convention gives $\delta f=[m,f]$. The shifted Jacobi identity and $[m,m]=0$ therefore show that the Gerstenhaber bracket respects Hochschild cocycles and the images of the coboundary map. The Hochschild cup product and Gerstenhaber bracket induce operations on Hochschild cohomology. A Gerstenhaber algebra is a graded algebra $H$ with an associative degree-zero product with the graded commutative algebra rule $uv=(-1{)}^{pq}vu$, and a degree-minus-one graded Lie bracket making the shifted degrees $|u|-1$ into a graded Lie algebra. In particular,for homogeneous elements of a graded algebra of degrees $p,q$. The shifted Jacobi identity isThe Hochschild cup product does not make the cochains a graded commutative algebra in general, but does make their cohomology a graded commutative algebra; the insertion operation supplies the homotopy for this assertion and for the graded Leibniz rule. Thus these axioms describe the induced Gerstenhaber algebra, not a claim of a graded commutative algebra structure on the cochain multiplication itself.

For $A=k[X]$, the enveloping algebra is $A^e=k[X_{\ell },X_r]$, andis a projective resolution. The first map is injective since $A^e$ is an integral domain, and its cokernel is $A$. Applying ${\mathrm{Hom}}_{A^e}(-,A)$ gives a zero coboundary map. ConsequentlyThe Hochschild cup product is ordinary multiplication of functions and scalar multiplication of derivations, with the product of two derivations zero because $H{H}^2=0$. Every derivation is $f{\partial }_X$, since it is determined by its value on $X$. The Gerstenhaber bracket iswith all other orders fixed by graded antisymmetry. These formulas fully determine the Gerstenhaber algebra.

For $A=k[X,Y]$, the Hochschild-Kostant-Rosenberg theorem identifiesThus the degrees zero, one, and two are $A$, $A{\partial }_X\oplus A{\partial }_Y$, and $A({\partial }_X\wedge {\partial }_Y)$, and all higher groups vanish. The Hochschild-Kostant-Rosenberg map sends a wedge of $p$ derivations to the cochainThe factorial is invertible in characteristic zero. Equivalently, the groups follow from the Koszul resolution on the regular sequence $X_{\ell }-X_r,Y_{\ell }-Y_r$ in $A^e$, whose dual coboundary maps vanish on $A$.

The Hochschild cup product becomes the exterior product, and our Gerstenhaber bracket becomes the left Schouten-Nijenhuis bracket. It is determined by the commutator of derivations, $[D,f]=D(f)$, zero brackets of functions, and the displayed graded antisymmetry and left graded Leibniz rule. For explicit signs, put $\Pi ={\partial }_X\wedge {\partial }_Y$ and $D=F{\partial }_X+G{\partial }_Y$. ThenThe last bracket has degree three, whose exterior power is zero. For two derivations, the coefficient functions of their commutator give the remaining formula. This specifies the entire Gerstenhaber algebra; under the alternate insertion convention mentioned above, the first displayed bracket changes sign, together with the Leibniz convention. No smoothness of a general finitely generated commutative algebra was assumed: the Hochschild-Kostant-Rosenberg theorem is invoked here only for the smooth polynomial ring $k[X,Y]$.

Let $P_{\bullet }\to \mathbb{Z}$ be a projective resolution of the trivial $\mathbb{Z}G$-module. The projective-resolution definition of group cohomology isThis is independent, up to a natural isomorphism, of the chosen projective resolution.

The degreewise natural isomorphismscommute with the coboundary maps. Taking cohomology proves that group cohomology commutes with finite direct sums:

Now restrict $P_{\bullet }$ from $G$ to a subgroup $K$. The group ring $\mathbb{Z}G$ is free as a $\mathbb{Z}K$-module, so restriction carries free modules to free modules and projective modules to projective modules. Thus the restricted complex is a projective resolution of the trivial $\mathbb{Z}K$-module. For the coinduced module $Y={\mathrm{Hom}}_{\mathbb{Z}K}(\mathbb{Z}G,X)$, the Hom functor adjunction for a coinduced module gives an isomorphism of cochain complexesExplicitly, a map $F$ is sent to $p\mapsto F(p)(1)$; the inverse sends a $\mathbb{Z}K$-linear map $a$ to $p\mapsto (r\mapsto a(rp))$. Taking cohomology proves Shapiro's lemma:

For the conjugation module of a group ring $N=\mathbb{Z}{G}_{\mathrm{conj}}$, the basis $G$ is the disjoint union of its conjugacy classes. Hence $N$ is the direct sum of the integral permutation modules on those classes. The class of a representative $g_i$ is the transitive $G$-set $G/C_G(g_i)$, where $C_G(g_i)$ is its centralizer. Since $G$ is finite, this permutation module is both induced and coinduced from the trivial $C_G(g_i)$-module $\mathbb{Z}$. Applying group cohomology commutes with finite direct sums and Shapiro's lemma yields the group cohomology of a conjugation module:

The symmetric group $S_3$ has three conjugacy classes, represented by the identity, a transposition, and a three-cycle. Their centralizers are respectivelyFor any finite group $L$ acting trivially on $\mathbb{Z}$,because a group homomorphism sends an element of finite order to an element of finite order, while the additive group of the integers contains no nonzero torsion elements. ThereforeThe periodic resolution of a finite cyclic group alternates the maps $t-1$ and $1+t+\cdots +t^{m-1}$. After applying ${\mathrm{Hom}}_{\mathbb{Z}{C}_m}(-,\mathbb{Z})$ with the trivial action, these become alternately zero and multiplication by $m$, provingCombining this calculation with the supplied $H^2(S_3,\mathbb{Z})\cong \mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}$ gives

For a nonzero module, the projective dimension ${\mathrm{pd}}_{R}M$ is the shortest length of a projective resolution of the module $M$, or infinity if no finite projective resolution exists. Equivalently, it is the supremum of degrees with nonzero ${\mathrm{Ext}}_R^n(M,N)$ as $N$ ranges over all modules. This equivalence follows by dimension shifting and the characterization of projective modules by vanishing ${\mathrm{Ext}}^1$.

A short exact sequence presenting a module as a quotient of a projective module. The kernel need not be projective. Continuing a projective presentation gives a projective resolution.

Choose a projective resolution $P_{\bullet }\to \mathbb{Z}$ of the trivial $\mathbb{Z}G$-module. For a $\mathbb{Z}G$-module $M$, group cohomology isDifferent projective resolutions give naturally isomorphic groups.

For an additive covariant left-exact functor on module categories, choose an injective resolution $M\to I^{\bullet }$ and set $R^{i}F(M)=H^i(F(I^{\bullet }))$. For a contravariant functor, use a projective resolution instead, as in contravariant right derived functor. Resolution comparison and homotopies give independence and functoriality; short exact sequences give long exact derived-functor sequences. The zeroth functor is naturally $F$.

Shapiro's lemma gives a natural isomorphismIt follows by applying the Hom functor adjunction for a coinduced module to a projective resolution and observing that restriction from $G$ to $K$ preserves projective modules.

For a nonzero left finitely generated module over a left Noetherian ring, take a finite projective resolution with finite projective modules. Vanishing of its top Ext functor would make the dual of its final injection surjective. These duals are right finite projective modules, so the surjection splits. Dualizing back and using finite projective double dual modules splits the original injection and shortens the resolution, contradicting the definition of projective dimension. When the dimension is zero, a coordinate map of a finite free module containing the nonzero projective summand supplies a nonzero map to $R$. The left/right distinction in the duals is essential for a noncommutative ring.