Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 137 5 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Write and . The double-coset Hecke algebra consists of -bi-invariant complex functions on supported on finitely many double cosets, with convolutionEach double coset has finitely many orbits under left multiplication by , by rational conjugation of finite-index modular subgroups. Thus the sum is finite and independent of representatives. The characteristic functions of the double cosets form its basis, and its right action on invariant modular forms is , using the determinant-normalized slash operator.
For a positive integer , let be all integral two-by-two matrices of positive determinant . It is -bi-invariant. Define to be its indicator function, equivalently the sum of the distinct double cosets it contains, each with coefficient one. This is the convention consistent with the requested formula. For composite , it need not be the single double coset of : for instance cannot lie in that double coset, since multiplying by unimodular integral matrices preserves the greatest common divisor of the entries.
Prove all the needed subgroup facts directly. For a finite-index subgroup , take to be the least positive first coordinate appearing in and the least positive second coordinate on its intersection with the second axis. Euclidean division then shows that the first-coordinate projection is and . Positivity follows, for example, because the finite quotient group kills a nonzero multiple of each coordinate vector. Choose and reduce modulo to . Every vector of has first coordinate a multiple of , and subtracting that multiple of leaves a multiple of . Therefore these two vectors form a basis of . The parameters are unique. Reducing the first coordinate modulo and then the second modulo gives precisely quotient representatives, so .
Apply this row Hermite normal form in rank two to the row lattice of an integral matrix with . Its row lattice contains , since , so it has finite index. Its two rows and the displayed two rows are bases of the same row lattice. The two inverse change-of-basis matrices have integer entries, so their determinants are integers whose product is one. Thus the change-of-basis matrix has determinant ; since both orientations are positive, its determinant is one. Thus each orbit under left multiplication by has exactly one of the determinant-n matrix representatives for Hecke operatorsThere are such representatives, proving finiteness as well as the formula. The subgroup argument is a proof of the relevant Hermite normal form, not an invocation of an unproved lattice classification.
Consequently the normalized Hecke operator isIt preserves : right multiplication by permutes the left-multiplication orbits in , giving invariance, and cusp holomorphy under rational slash operators gives the holomorphy of each term at every cusp.
For a triangular representative the determinant-normalized slash operator is . Summing the Fourier expansion of a modular form over kills every index not divisible by , by finite exponential orthogonality. ThusThe Fourier coefficients of a composite-index Hecke operator are thereforeIn particular . If , comparison of the coefficients gives
Finally suppose and is a simultaneous eigenfunction. Constant coefficients force , so for all . Weight two cannot occur, by vanishing of weight-two level-one modular forms. For even , use the normalized Eisenstein series with its Fourier expansion of a normalized Eisenstein serieswhere is the Bernoulli number. Then is a cusp form with coefficients . The Fourier coefficient bound for a cusp form bounds these by , but at arbitrarily large primes their magnitude is . Since , the coefficient factor must vanish. All coefficients of then vanish, including its constant coefficient, so by its cusp expansion and the identity theorem. This proves the noncuspidal level-one Hecke eigenform characterization:
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 ia Paper 3 7D Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
For a normal subgroup , the quotient group is the set of cosets with multiplication . If and , normality moves the intervening elements of past , proving that the product is independent of representatives.
If has finite order , then , so divides . For finite , the greatest element order in is therefore no greater than that in .
Every kernel is normal because whenever . Conversely, if is normal, the quotient map has kernel . Thus exactly when it is the kernel of a group homomorphism.
A group is metacyclic when it has a cyclic normal subgroup with cyclic quotient. A dihedral group has its cyclic rotation subgroup normal and quotient , so every dihedral group is metacyclic.
Up to isomorphism the groups of order eight areAll except are metacyclic: use a cyclic subgroup of order four in the three noncyclic examples that have one. In , every cyclic subgroup has order at most two and its quotient is not cyclic. The normal subgroups of are ; none gives the required cyclic subgroup and quotient, so is not metacyclic. Finally, are metacyclic, while and are not, by their normal-subgroup structures. Hence
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 ii Paper 3 20F a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
Because is a simplicial subcomplex of , every face of a simplex of also belongs to . The simplicial boundary operator therefore satisfiesso is a chain subcomplex of the simplicial chain complex .
Define a map on the quotient groups byIf with , then , so this definition is independent of the representative. Moreover,Thus is the relative simplicial chain complex.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 ia Paper 3 7E Solution Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-25
A subgroup is normal whenIts left and right cosets then agree, and multiplicationis well defined on the cosets. The identity is , the inverse of is , and associativity descends from , so these cosets form the quotient group .
For a group homomorphism , its kernel and image areThe kernel is normal becausewhenever . Conversely, if , the quotient mapis a homomorphism with kernel . The image of any homomorphism is closed under products and inverses, so it is a subgroup of . Finally, the mapis well defined and bijective and preserves multiplication. This is the first isomorphism theorem.
DefineEuler's formula shows that is a homomorphism, its image is the complex unit circle, and its kernel is . The first isomorphism theorem therefore givesThe image of consists exactly of the roots of unity: if , then , while every element of finite order on the unit circle has an argument that is a rational multiple of .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 iii Paper 342 1 d Solution 2026-09-28
Let and denote the two oriented noncontractible cycles of the torus. Their transport operators intersect once, so the mutual braiding phase gives the Wilson-loop algebra of an Abelian Chern--Simons theoryThe integer charge vectors are identified modulo local electrons: and have identical braiding with every quasiparticle. The distinct topological charges therefore form the finite quotient group
Choose a ground state that diagonalizes the mutually commuting -cycle operators. Acting with multiplies their eigenvalues by the character . This pairing is nondegenerate on : if the character is trivial for every , then is integral and is the trivial class. Thus the states obtained from inequivalent have distinct loop eigenvalues and are orthogonal. The torus ground-state degeneracy of an Abelian Chern--Simons theory is consequently at least .
The all-ones matrix has eigenvalue along and eigenvalue zero on the -dimensional perpendicular subspace. Hence has eigenvalues , and
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2025 iii Paper 302 1 d iii Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
The map is a surjective group homomorphism with kernel , so is a normal subgroup and . The subgroup is not normal: for a translation ,which leaves when and . Finally, is a surjective homomorphism onto with kernel , so and the quotient group .
Relative chain complex 2026-10-03
For a subspace , the relative chain complex is the quotient group in each degree,with boundary operator . This is well defined because is a chain subcomplex of .